Literature DB >> 35788768

The leap to ordinal: Detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach.

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay1,2,3, Ioan Milosevic1, Lindsay Wilson4, David K Menon1, Robert D Stevens3,5, Ewout W Steyerberg6, David W Nelson7, Ari Ercole1,8.   

Abstract

When a patient is admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after a traumatic brain injury (TBI), an early prognosis is essential for baseline risk adjustment and shared decision making. TBI outcomes are commonly categorised by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) into eight, ordered levels of functional recovery at 6 months after injury. Existing ICU prognostic models predict binary outcomes at a certain threshold of GOSE (e.g., prediction of survival [GOSE > 1]). We aimed to develop ordinal prediction models that concurrently predict probabilities of each GOSE score. From a prospective cohort (n = 1,550, 65 centres) in the ICU stratum of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) patient dataset, we extracted all clinical information within 24 hours of ICU admission (1,151 predictors) and 6-month GOSE scores. We analysed the effect of two design elements on ordinal model performance: (1) the baseline predictor set, ranging from a concise set of ten validated predictors to a token-embedded representation of all possible predictors, and (2) the modelling strategy, from ordinal logistic regression to multinomial deep learning. With repeated k-fold cross-validation, we found that expanding the baseline predictor set significantly improved ordinal prediction performance while increasing analytical complexity did not. Half of these gains could be achieved with the addition of eight high-impact predictors to the concise set. At best, ordinal models achieved 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77) ordinal discrimination ability (ordinal c-index) and 57% (95% CI: 54%- 60%) explanation of ordinal variation in 6-month GOSE (Somers' Dxy). Model performance and the effect of expanding the predictor set decreased at higher GOSE thresholds, indicating the difficulty of predicting better functional outcomes shortly after ICU admission. Our results motivate the search for informative predictors that improve confidence in prognosis of higher GOSE and the development of ordinal dynamic prediction models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35788768      PMCID: PMC9255749          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  54 in total

1.  Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  J T L Wilson; P Edwards; H Fiddes; E Stewart; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Julian Han; Nicolas K K King; Sam J Neilson; Mihir P Gandhi; Ivan Ng
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Gordon D Murray; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Juan Lu; Nino A Mushkudiani; Andrew I R Maas; Anthony Marmarou; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Giuseppe Citerio; Fiona Lecky; Geoffrey T Manley; Sean Hill; Valerie Legrand; Annina Sorgner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is a Favorable Outcome?

Authors:  David A Zuckerman; Joseph T Giacino; Yelena G Bodien
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.869

6.  Temporal Neurophysiological Dynamics in Traumatic Brain Injury: Role of Pressure Reactivity and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure for Predicting Outcome.

Authors:  Teodor Svedung Wettervik; Timothy Howells; Per Enblad; Anders Lewén
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Eveline Wiegers; Charlie Sewalt; Andras Buki; Giuseppe Citerio; Véronique De Keyser; Ari Ercole; Kevin Kunzmann; Linda Lanyon; Fiona Lecky; Hester Lingsma; Geoffrey Manley; David Nelson; Wilco Peul; Nino Stocchetti; Nicole von Steinbüchel; Thijs Vande Vyvere; Jan Verheyden; Lindsay Wilson; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Graphical assessment of internal and external calibration of logistic regression models by using loess smoothers.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Cerebrospinal Fluid and Microdialysis Cytokines in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Systematic Review.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Eric Peter Thelin; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Hutchinson; David K Menon; Adel Helmy
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.