Literature DB >> 24568201

External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.

Julian Han1, Nicolas K K King, Sam J Neilson, Mihir P Gandhi, Ivan Ng.   

Abstract

An accurate prognostic model is extremely important in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) for both patient management and research. Clinical prediction models must be validated both internally and externally before they are considered widely applicable. Our aim is to independently externally validate two prediction models, one developed by the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head injury (CRASH) trial investigators, and the other from the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) group. We used a cohort of 300 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] ≤8) consecutively admitted to the National Neuroscience Institute (NNI), Singapore, between February 2006 and December 2009. The CRASH models (base and CT) predict 14 day mortality and 6 month unfavorable outcome. The IMPACT models (core, extended, and laboratory) estimate 6 month mortality and unfavorable outcome. Validation was based on measures of discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test and Cox calibration regression analysis. In the NNI database, the overall observed 14 day mortality was 47.7%, and the observed 6 month unfavorable outcome was 71.0%. The CRASH base model and all three IMPACT models gave an underestimate of the observed values in our cohort when used to predict outcome. Using the CRASH CT model, the predicted 14 day mortality of 46.6% approximated the observed outcome, whereas the predicted 6 month unfavorable outcome was an overestimate at 74.8%. Overall, both the CRASH and IMPACT models showed good discrimination, with AUCs ranging from 0.80 to 0.89, and good overall calibration. We conclude that both the CRASH and IMPACT models satisfactorily predicted outcome in our patients with severe TBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TBI; external validation; prediction models; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24568201     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  25 in total

Review 1.  Medical Management of the Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patient.

Authors:  Jonathan Marehbian; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Brian L Edlow; Holly E Hinson; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Presenting Characteristics Associated With Outcome in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Authors:  Bedda L Rosario; Christopher M Horvat; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michael J Bell; Ashok Panigrahy; Giulio Zuccoli; Srikala Narayanan; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Sue R Beers; P David Adelson
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Perfusion Abnormalities are Frequently Detected by Early CT Perfusion and Predict Unfavourable Outcome Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Cino Bendinelli; Shannon Cooper; Tiffany Evans; Andrew Bivard; Dianne Pacey; Mark Parson; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The leap to ordinal: Detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach.

Authors:  Shubhayu Bhattacharyay; Ioan Milosevic; Lindsay Wilson; David K Menon; Robert D Stevens; Ewout W Steyerberg; David W Nelson; Ari Ercole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Prognostic Models in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rita de Cássia Almeida Vieira; Juliana Cristina Pereira Silveira; Wellingson Silva Paiva; Daniel Vieira de Oliveira; Camila Pedroso Estevam de Souza; Eduesley Santana-Santos; Regina Marcia Cardoso de Sousa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.532

6.  Lateral Ventricle Volume Asymmetry Predicts Midline Shift in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Arnold Tóth; Ilona Schmalfuss; Shelley C Heaton; Andrea Gabrielli; H Julia Hannay; Linda Papa; Gretchen M Brophy; Kevin K W Wang; András Büki; Attila Schwarcz; Ronald L Hayes; Claudia S Robertson; Steven A Robicsek
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Analysis of high-frequency PbtO2 measures in traumatic brain injury: insights into the treatment threshold.

Authors:  Ryan Hirschi; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Jessica L Nielson; J Russell Huie; Lara L Zimmermann; Rajiv Saigal; Quan Ding; Adam R Ferguson; Geoffrey Manley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Outcome Prognostication of Acute Brain Injury using the Neurological Pupil Index (ORANGE) study: protocol for a prospective, observational, multicentre, international cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Oddo; Fabio Taccone; Stefania Galimberti; Paola Rebora; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Midline shift in relation to thickness of traumatic acute subdural hematoma predicts mortality.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; Frederick J A Meijer; Hans van der Hoeven; Michael Edwards; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Polytrauma Is Associated with Increased Three- and Six-Month Disability after Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.

Authors:  John K Yue; Gabriela G Satris; Cecilia L Dalle Ore; J Russell Huie; Hansen Deng; Ethan A Winkler; Young M Lee; Mary J Vassar; Sabrina R Taylor; David M Schnyer; Hester F Lingsma; Ava M Puccio; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Alex B Valadka; Adam R Ferguson; Amy J Markowitz; David O Okonkwo; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2020-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.