Literature DB >> 35788724

Evolution of adverse drug reactions reporting systems: paper based to software based.

M T Madhushika1, T P Weerarathna2, P L G C Liyanage3, S S Jayasinghe3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) add a significant clinical and economic burden to the healthcare system of a country. We present an overview of the different approaches of ADR reporting systems worldwide and their evolution over time.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was made based on PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. The articles searched for included original articles, WHO and FDA reports and institute of medicine reports. Reporting ADRs is the cornerstone of detecting uncommon ADRs once the drugs are on the market. In many countries, ADR reporting is regulated by national regulatory bodies and various methods are employed to report ADRs. Direct reporting by healthcare professionals has been adopted by many developed and developing countries. With emerging new technologies in the field of medicine, there is a great potential to develop better ADR reporting systems in the countries where they have poor reporting.
CONCLUSION: Development and acquisition of newer technologies to promote ADR monitoring and reporting is a necessity for an effective pharmacovigilance system in a country.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse drug reaction reporting systems; Drug information; Pharmacovigilance; Post-marketing surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35788724     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03358-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   3.064


  7 in total

1.  Workshop- and telephone-based interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a cluster-randomized trial in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Herdeiro; Inês Ribeiro-Vaz; Mónica Ferreira; Jorge Polónia; Amílcar Falcão; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance in the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  J C Talbot; B S Nilsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  J Lazarou; B H Pomeranz; P N Corey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patient Reporting in the EU: Analysis of EudraVigilance Data.

Authors:  Marin Banovac; Gianmario Candore; Jim Slattery; Francois Houÿez; David Haerry; Georgy Genov; Peter Arlett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an overview of fifty countries.

Authors:  Florence Margraff; Delphine Bertram
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Africa and a Comparison of Individual Case Safety Report Characteristics Between Africa and the Rest of the World: Analyses of Spontaneous Reports in VigiBase®.

Authors:  Haggar H Ampadu; Jarno Hoekman; Marieke L de Bruin; Shanthi N Pal; Sten Olsson; Daniele Sartori; Hubert G M Leufkens; Alexander N O Dodoo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Experiences and Lessons From Implementing Cohort Event Monitoring Programmes for Antimalarials in Four African Countries: Results of a Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Authors:  Comfort Kunak Suku; Geraldine Hill; George Sabblah; Mimi Darko; George Muthuri; Edward Abwao; Jayesh Pandit; Adeline Ijeoma Osakwe; Cassandra Elagbaje; Priscilla Nyambayo; Star Khoza; Alexander N Dodoo; Shanthi Narayan Pal
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.