Literature DB >> 3578867

Dopamine compared with dobutamine in experimental septic shock: relevance to fluid administration.

J L Vincent, P Van der Linden, M Domb, S Blecic, G Azimi, A Bernard.   

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of dopamine and dobutamine (at doses of 6 micrograms X kg-1 X min-1) were compared during fluid resuscitation from septic shock induced by endotoxin (3 mg/kg) in the dog. In the first part of the study, when a standard amount of saline solution was infused (in 24 dogs), dopamine infusion resulted in higher cardiac filling pressures than did dobutamine infusion, whereas dobutamine infusion resulted in higher cardiac output. In the second part of the study, when fluid infusion was titrated to maintain pulmonary artery balloon-occluded pressure at constant level (in 24 dogs), the total amount of fluids was significantly greater with dobutamine than when dopamine was used (109 +/- 13 vs 71 +/- 10 ml/kg). The combination of dobutamine with fluids resulted in significantly greater stroke volume (39.6 +/- 3.8 vs 21.0 +/- 4.0 ml, P less than 0.05) and oxygen consumption (194 +/- 18 vs 144 +/- 8 ml/min, P less than 0.05). The different effects of dopamine and dobutamine on cardiac filling pressures can be due to differences in effects on myocardial contractility, ventricular afterload, and cardiac compliance. This experimental study indicates that when fluid therapy is combined with adrenergic agents in resuscitation from septic shock, dobutamine can be associated with higher cardiac output and oxygen transport and can result in higher tissue oxygen consumption than dopamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3578867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

Review 1.  Catecholamines in critical care. The commonly used catecholamines: receptor and clinical profile, indications and dosages.

Authors:  F W Santman
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-10-16

2.  Time course of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference in septic shock patients receiving incremental doses of dobutamine.

Authors:  Jihad Mallat; Younes Benzidi; Julia Salleron; Malcolm Lemyze; Gaëlle Gasan; Nicolas Vangrunderbeeck; Florent Pepy; Laurent Tronchon; Benoit Vallet; Didier Thevenin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Inodilators in septic shock: should these be used?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Luis E Calderón-Tapia
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 4.  Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: 2014 updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO).

Authors:  Olaf Penack; Carolin Becker; Dieter Buchheidt; Maximilian Christopeit; Michael Kiehl; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Marcus Hentrich; Marc Reinwald; Hans Salwender; Enrico Schalk; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Thomas Weber; Helmut Ostermann
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 5.  The spectrum of cardiovascular effects of dobutamine - from healthy subjects to septic shock patients.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Bernardo Lattanzio; Luis Gatti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.