| Literature DB >> 35787271 |
Zijing Huang1, Kunliang Qiu1, Jingsheng Yi1, Hongjie Lin1, Dezhi Zheng1, Dingguo Huang1, Guihua Zhang1, Haoyu Chen1, Jianlong Zheng1, Yifan Wang1, Danqi Fang1, Weiqi Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Capillary non-perfusion is an important characteristic for diabetic retinopathy (DR) indicating microvascular damage and ischemia. Data on the description and treatment outcomes of DR with large area of non-perfusion are lacking to date. We aim to describe the characteristics and treatment outcomes in a series of patients with DR who presented extensively large area of capillary non-perfusion (LACNP).Entities:
Keywords: Capillary non-perfusion; Diabetic retinopathy; Large area; Laser photocoagulation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35787271 PMCID: PMC9254521 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02508-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.086
Patient demographics at the time of fluorescence fundus angiography
| Characteristics | Number or levels (range)c |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 10 |
| Female | 14 |
| Average age (years) | 56.0 ± 9.0 (35~71) |
| Course of DMa (years) | 7.3 ± 5.6 (1~25) |
| Hypertension (mmHg) | 153.8 ± 11.9 / 91.3 ± 6.4, |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 13.6 ± 4.7 (6.6~21.7) |
| HbA1cb (%) | 8.1 ± 1.7 (5.5~12.7) |
| Renal function | |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 122.3 ± 57.1 (52~280) |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 9.9 ± 3.6 (5.3~20.2) |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 125.0 ± 11.0 (107~147) |
| Albumin (g/L) | 42.5 ± 9.6 (29.2~77.5) |
aDM diabetes mellitus
bHbA1c hemoglobin A1c
cData are mean ± SD (range)
Fig. 1Diagrams showing measurement of area of capillary non-perfusion (CNP) in diabetic retinopathy. A Angiographic images of a patient with large area of retinal capillary non-perfusion except the macular region. B, C The area of CNP was measured by manually circling the CNP area (B) and filling it with color (C) using the Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. The measurement was performed by two dependent researchers and an average was taken
Fig. 2Representative images of excessively large area of capillary non-perfusion (LACNP) in diabetic retinopathy. A-C Angiographic images of 3 eyes with LACNP. Neovascularization and vascular leakage were found in the peripheral (A) and mid-peripheral area (B). Local ischemia of the macula was noted (C)
Imaging characteristics of eyes with LACNP
| Characteristics | Number (percentage) |
|---|---|
| Fundus fluorescence angiography | |
| LACNP | 43 (100%) |
| Area of non-perfusion | 79.1 ± 8.1% |
| Neovascularization | 43 (100%) |
| NVD | 15 (34.9%) |
| NVE | 19 (44.2%) |
| NVD+NVE | 9 (20.9%) |
| Macular ischemia | 25 (58.1%) |
| Fundus photography | |
| Hemorrhage | 15 (34.9%) |
| Exudation | 14 (32.6%) |
| Neovascularization | 13 (30.2%) |
| Proliferative membrane | 10 (23.3%) |
| Optical coherence tomography, | |
| Macular edema | |
| CME | 16 (48.5%) |
| Diffused edema | 9 (27.3%) |
| DRIL | 29 (87.9%) |
| Interruption of the EZ | 19 (57.6%) |
| Retinal cysts | 16 (48.5%) |
Abbreviations: LACNP large area of capillary non-perfusion, NVD new vessels on or within one disc diameter of the optic disc, NVE new vessels elsewhere, CME cystoid macular edema, DRIL disorganization of retinal inner layers, EC ellipsoid zone
Fig. 3A diagram showing treatment intervention and prognosis in eyes with large area of capillary non-perfusion (LACNP). *Conservative medical treatment was applied in eyes with no evidence of neovascular complications (n=23) or with end-stage of diabetic retinopathy indicating very poor surgical prognosis (n=5). **Surgical intervention (n=15) included pars plana vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage and/or tractional detachment (n=11) and anti-glaucoma surgery (n=4). ***Improved or stable was defined as an increase of BCVA or a decrease of less than one ETDRS line (5 letters) without significant neovascular complications. ****Worsening was considered with a decrease of 1 EDTRS line or more. PRP: pan retinal photocoagulation
Treatment and outcomes in eyes with LACNP
| Number (percentage) | |
|---|---|
| Laser burns in PRP | 1798.0 ± 724.9 |
| Macular grid laser | 5 (11.6%) |
| Follow-up duration (months) | 12.4 ± 16.7 |
| logMAR BCVA | |
| Improved | 12 (27.9%) |
| Stable | 7 (16.3%) |
| Deteriorated | 24 (55.8%) |
| Complications | |
| VH | 12 (27.9%) |
| TRD | 6 (14.0%) |
| NVG | 9 (20.9%) |
| Intervention | |
| Anti-VEGF agents | 17 (39.5%) |
| PPV surgery | 11 (25.6%) |
| Anti-glaucoma surgery | 4 (9.3%) |
Abbreviations: PRP pan-retinal photocoagulation, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, FFA fluorescence fundus angiography, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, PPV pars plana vitrectomy, VH Vitreous hemorrhage, TRD Tractional retinal detachment, NVG Neovascular glaucoma. Data are mean ± SD
Fig. 4Representative images of a patient with LACNP who presented stable visual acuity and mild progression of DR during the one-year follow-ups. Angiographic images showing LACNP at his first presentation (A) and 1 year after non-surgical treatment (B). C-D Angiographic images showing detailed information of the posterior pole before and after treatment. At first time of FFA, macular capillary perfusion combined with multiple vascular leakages was seen (C). Macular capillary perfusion was maintained one year after treatment. Vascular leakage was reduced while local hemorrhage could be seen (D). E-F Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy showing pan-retinal photocoagulation divided into 2 sessions. G-H Optical coherence tomography revealed diffused macular edema and local epimacular membrane at the first presentation. The central macular thickness was 548 μm before extensive PRP (G). At the final follow-up after treatment, macular edema showed mild reduction with the central macular thickness of 502 μm (H)
Fig. 5Representative images of a patient with LACNP who developed rapid worsening of DR within a few months. A-B At first presentation, LACNP was found in the peripheral retina except the macula region in his right eye (Arrow indicated peripheral non-perfusion area in panel B). C-D In his left eye, FFA exam revealed large area of capillary non-perfusion spreading the whole retina before treatment (Arrow indicated macular non-perfusion in panel D). E-F He received extensive pan-retinal laser photocoagulation in his right eye but still developed macular non-perfusion several months later with very poor visual acuity (Arrow indicated macula-involved non-perfusion in panel F)