| Literature DB >> 35785481 |
Jerod M Rasmussen1,2, Paul M Thompson3, Lauren E Gyllenhammer1,2, Karen L Lindsay2,4, Thomas G O'Connor5, Berthold Koletzko6, Sonja Entringer1,2,7, Pathik D Wadhwa1,2,8,9,10, Claudia Buss1,2,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis, in a prospective cohort study design, that maternal saturated free fatty acid (sFFA) concentration during pregnancy is prospectively associated with offspring (newborn) hypothalamic (HTH) microstructure and to explore the functional relevance of this association with respect to early-childhood body fat percentage (BF%).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35785481 PMCID: PMC9541037 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) ISSN: 1930-7381 Impact factor: 9.298
Demographic information
| Maternal age (y), mean (SD) | 27.8 (5.5) |
| Maternal prepregnancy BMI, continuous | 27.4 (6.6) |
| Maternal prepregnancy BMI category, % | |
| Underweight | 3.2 |
| Normal weight | 44.7 |
| Overweight | 25.5 |
| Obesity | 25.5 |
| Maternal race/ethnicity, % | |
| White non‐Hispanic | 39.4 |
| White Hispanic | 34.0 |
| Asian | 7.5 |
| Other | 19.1 |
| Household highest level of maternal education, % | |
| High school or test equivalent | 22.2 |
| Vocational school or some college | 41.2 |
| Associate's degree | 5.8 |
| Bachelors or graduate level degree | 30.7 |
| Gross annual household income, % | |
| <$15,000 | 10.0 |
| $15,000–$29,999 | 20.0 |
| $30,000–$49,999 | 22.2 |
| $50,000–$100,000 | 40.0 |
| >$100,000 | 7.8 |
| Birth characteristics | |
| Gestational age at birth (N = 94) (wk), mean (SD) | 39.3 (1.5) |
| Weight at birth (g), mean (SD) | 3,347 (485) |
| Length at birth, (in), mean (SD) | 50.1 (2.7) |
| Infant MRI | |
| Postnatal age at scan (d), mean (SD) | 25.3 (12.5) |
| Weight at scan (kg), mean (SD) | 3.99 (0.65) |
| Childhood DXA | |
| Age at scan (n = 37) (y), mean (SD) | 4.7 (0.7) |
Note: Demographic information for the full sample (N = 94 mothers or the subset of n = 37 children with follow‐up DXA imaging) with available maternal sFFA and MRI measurements. There were no significant differences in key demographics between the full sample and the DXA subset.
Abbreviations: DXA, dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; sFFA, saturated free fatty acid.
FIGURE 1Image processing overview. Image processing included a community standard preprocessing pipeline (e.g., FSL's eddy) followed by a three‐dimensional atlas‐based region of interest (ROI) HTH definition (magenta outline, bottom left). HTH MD was summarized by the median value. Inset images are composed of relative high (top) and low (bottom) sample median HTH MD images. DWI, diffusion‐weighted imaging; FSL, FMRIB Software Library; HTH, hypothalamic; MD, mean diffusivity; ROI, region of interest [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Parsimonious and full model comparison: maternal sFFA concentration during pregnancy and infant HTH MD
| Parsimonious model | Full model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| sFFA concentration | 0.25 | 8.3% | 0.006 | 0.23 | 8.1% | 0.008 |
| Gestational age at birth | 0.13 | 1.0% | 0.361 | 0.00 | 0.0% | 0.943 |
| Postnatal age at scan | 0.17 | 1.7% | 0.226 | 0.06 | 0.2% | 0.665 |
| Infant sex (male) | 0.11 | 0.4% | 0.543 | 0.09 | 0.3% | 0.612 |
| White matter MD | 0.57 | 14.4% | <0.001 | 0.47 | 11.1% | 0.002 |
| QC (framewise displacement) | 0.22 | 6.3% | 0.017 | 0.15 | 3.2% | 0.097 |
| Socioeconomic status | na | na | na | 0.21 | 5.3% | 0.033 |
| Hispanic (yes) | na | na | na | 0.56 | 10.9% | 0.002 |
| OB risk (yes) | na | na | na | −0.34 | 4.3% | 0.056 |
Note: Maternal sFFA concentration during pregnancy was associated with infant HTH MD.
Abbreviations: HTH, hypothalamic; MD, mean diffusivity; na, not applicable; OB, obesity; QC, quality control; sFFA, saturated free fatty acid.
FIGURE 2Maternal saturated free fatty acid (sFFA) concentration during pregnancy and infant hypothalamic MD (HTH MD). Maternal sFFA was linearly associated with newborn HTH MD (HTH region of interest inset) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Parsimonious and full model comparison: offspring HTH MD and early‐childhood BF%
| Parsimonious model | Full model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HTH MD | 0.32 | 14.8% | 0.019 | 0.41 | 17.2% | 0.037 |
| Breastfeeding status | na | na | na | 0.22 | 5.0% | 0.210 |
| SES | na | na | na | 0.26 | 7.4% | 0.125 |
| Hispanic (yes) | na | na | na | 0.63 | 9.0% | 0.090 |
| Obstetric risk (yes) | na | na | na | −0.23 | 1.5% | 0.493 |
Note: Infant HTH MD was associated with early‐childhood BF%.
Abbreviations: BF%, body fat percentage; HTH, hypothalamic; MD, mean diffusivity; na, not applicable; SES, socioeconomic status.
FIGURE 3Infant hypothalamic mean diffusivity (HTH MD) is associated with early‐childhood body fat percentage (BF%). Residualized newborn HTH MD (Equation 2a) was linearly associated with earlychildhood BF% [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]