Dib Sassine1, Chrissy Liu1, Yukio Sonoda1,2, Dennis S Chi1,2. 1. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative gross residual disease after cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer impacts patient survival negatively. Specifically, unresected enlarged, metastatic supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes (SDLNs) may worsen progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multiple studies have shown that upper abdominal debulking during primary cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes, but the evidence for resection of SDLN metastasis is less definitive. This review focuses on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SDLN resection for metastatic disease in advanced-stage ovarian cancer and explores emerging data on survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: A literature review from January 2004 to December 2021 identified 4 relevant studies, all published after 2016. Eligible studies included patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who had undergone SDLN resection using a transdiaphragmatic approach or video-assisted thorascopy, and had evaluated SDLN dissection for diagnoses and treatment or assessed the benefits of SDLN resection as it relates to prognosis. Results: All 4 studies demonstrated the feasibility and safety of SDLN resection. Three of the studies reported a low intrathoracic recurrence rate after intrathoracic debulking. Cowan et al. described an impressive median PFS and OS of 17.2 months and 70.1 months, respectively, in patients who had undergone SDLN resection. Conclusions: Resection of enlarged SDLNs in carefully selected patients has the potential to confirm intrathoracic disease spread, help achieve maximal cytoreduction without delaying adjuvant treatment, and improve survival. More studies are needed to quantify the survival benefit of SDLN resection. (J GYNECOL SURG 38:202). Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Objective: Postoperative gross residual disease after cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer impacts patient survival negatively. Specifically, unresected enlarged, metastatic supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes (SDLNs) may worsen progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multiple studies have shown that upper abdominal debulking during primary cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes, but the evidence for resection of SDLN metastasis is less definitive. This review focuses on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SDLN resection for metastatic disease in advanced-stage ovarian cancer and explores emerging data on survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: A literature review from January 2004 to December 2021 identified 4 relevant studies, all published after 2016. Eligible studies included patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who had undergone SDLN resection using a transdiaphragmatic approach or video-assisted thorascopy, and had evaluated SDLN dissection for diagnoses and treatment or assessed the benefits of SDLN resection as it relates to prognosis. Results: All 4 studies demonstrated the feasibility and safety of SDLN resection. Three of the studies reported a low intrathoracic recurrence rate after intrathoracic debulking. Cowan et al. described an impressive median PFS and OS of 17.2 months and 70.1 months, respectively, in patients who had undergone SDLN resection. Conclusions: Resection of enlarged SDLNs in carefully selected patients has the potential to confirm intrathoracic disease spread, help achieve maximal cytoreduction without delaying adjuvant treatment, and improve survival. More studies are needed to quantify the survival benefit of SDLN resection. (J GYNECOL SURG 38:202). Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Authors: Tae-Hyung Kim; Myong Cheol Lim; Se Ik Kim; Sang-Soo Seo; Sun Ho Kim; Sang-Yoon Park Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: D S Chi; E L Eisenhauer; J Lang; J Huh; L Haddad; N R Abu-Rustum; Y Sonoda; D A Levine; M Hensley; R R Barakat Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-05-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Sonia Prader; Philipp Harter; Christoph Grimm; Alexander Traut; Kai-Uwe Waltering; Pier Francesco Alesina; Sebastian Heikaus; Beyhan Ataseven; Florian Heitz; Stephanie Schneider; Andreas du Bois Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: William E Winter; G Larry Maxwell; Chunqiao Tian; Michael J Sundborg; G Scott Rose; Peter G Rose; Stephen C Rubin; Franco Muggia; William P McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Renee A Cowan; Jill Tseng; Vijayashree Murthy; Radhika Srivastava; Kara C Long Roche; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Dennis S Chi; Bernard J Park; Yukio Sonoda Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: In Ok Lee; Jung-Yun Lee; Hyun Jeong Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Chang Young Lee; Won Jun Kang; Young Tae Kim Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Sara Nasser; Mara Kyrgiou; Jonathan Krell; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Robert Bristow; Christina Fotopoulou Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 5.344