Literature DB >> 18025437

Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

William E Winter1, G Larry Maxwell, Chunqiao Tian, Michael J Sundborg, G Scott Rose, Peter G Rose, Stephen C Rubin, Franco Muggia, William P McGuire.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 360 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV EOC who underwent primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was performed. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of potential prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The median PFS and OS for this group of stage IV ovarian cancer patients was 12 and 29 months, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that histology, malignant pleural effusion, intraparenchymal liver metastasis, and residual tumor size were significant prognostic variables. Whereas patients with microscopic residual disease had the best outcome, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm residual disease and patients with 1.1 to 5.0 cm residual disease had similar PFS and OS. Patients with a residual size more than 5 cm had a diminished PFS and OS when compared with all other groups. Median OS for microscopic, 0.1 to 5.0 cm, and more than 5.0 cm residual disease was 64, 30, and 19 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Patients with more than 5 cm residual disease have the shortest PFS and OS, whereas patients with 0.1 to 1.0 and 1.1 to 5.0 cm have similar outcome. These findings suggest that ultraradical cytoreductive procedures might be targeted for selected patients in whom microscopic residual disease is achievable. Patients with less than 5.0 cm of disease initially and significant disease and/or comorbidities precluding microscopic cytoreduction may be considered for alternative therapeutic options other than primary cytoreduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025437     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  95 in total

1.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  The Two Faces of Adjuvant Glucocorticoid Treatment in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Djedovic; Yoo-Young Lee; Alexandra Kollara; Taymaa May; Theodore J Brown
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Austin Miller; Bunja Rungruang; Scott D Richard; Noah Rodriguez; Michael A Bookman; Chad A Hamilton; Thomas C Krivak; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  The role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer relapse.

Authors:  E Saladino; F Fleres; S Irato; C Famulari; A Macrì
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-08-27

5.  The role of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Arthur Cho; Jae-Hoon Lee; Mijin Yun; Jong Doo Lee; Young Tae Kim; Won Jun Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Cytokine profiling of ascites at primary surgery identifies an interaction of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 in predicting reduced progression-free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nonna Kolomeyevskaya; Kevin H Eng; Anm Nazmul H Khan; Kassondra S Grzankowski; Kelly L Singel; Kirsten Moysich; Brahm H Segal
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Survivorship as an element of clinical trials in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jessica N McAlpine; Lari B Wenzel
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 8.  Intraoperative imaging in ovarian cancer: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Lucia M A Crane; Marleen van Oosten; Rick G Pleijhuis; Arash Motekallemi; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Ate G J van der Zee; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Advanced Primary Epithelial Ovarian and Peritoneal Carcinoma-Does Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative CT Scan for Detection of Peritoneal Metastatic Sites Reflect into Prediction of Suboptimal Debulking? A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Kiran Bagul; D K Vijaykumar; Anupama Rajanbabu; Mitchelle Aline Antony; Venkatesan Ranganathan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-18

Review 10.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.