| Literature DB >> 35784262 |
R Durga1, E Poovammal1.
Abstract
With the SARS-CoV-2's exponential growth, intelligent and constructive practice is required to diagnose the COVID-19. The rapid spread of the virus and the shortage of reliable testing models are considered major issues in detecting COVID-19. This problem remains the peak burden for clinicians. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in image processing, the burden of diagnosing the COVID-19 cases has been reduced to acceptable thresholds. But traditional AI techniques often require centralized data storage and training for the predictive model development which increases the computational complexity. The real-world challenge is to exchange data globally across hospitals while also taking into account of the organizations' privacy concerns. Collaborative model development and privacy protection are critical considerations while training a global deep learning model. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel framework based on blockchain and the federated learning model. The federated learning model takes care of reduced complexity, and blockchain helps in distributed data with privacy maintained. More precisely, the proposed federated learning ensembled deep five learning blockchain model (FLED-Block) framework collects the data from the different medical healthcare centers, develops the model with the hybrid capsule learning network, and performs the prediction accurately, while preserving the privacy and shares among authorized persons. Extensive experimentation has been carried out using the lung CT images and compared the performance of the proposed model with the existing VGG-16 and 19, Alexnets, Resnets-50 and 100, Inception V3, Densenets-121, 119, and 150, Mobilenets, SegCaps in terms of accuracy (98.2%), precision (97.3%), recall (96.5%), specificity (33.5%), and F1-score (97%) in predicting the COVID-19 with effectively preserving the privacy of the data among the heterogeneous users.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence; capsule learning model; extreme learning machine; image processing; privacy preservation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35784262 PMCID: PMC9247602 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Proposed framework of the FLED-Block.
Figure 2Computed tomography specimen images—Dataset-1.
Summary of the dataset details used for the proposed research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datasets-1 | CC-19 datasets [ ] | 63 | 26 | CT Scan images | 89 | 34,006 |
| Datasets-2 | COVID-19-CT datasets | 783 | 217 | DICOM Images | 1,000 | 45,002 |
| Dataset-3 | COVID-19 CT datasets [ ] | 216 | 463 | CT Scan Images/DICOM | 689 | 3,490 |
Figure 3Computed tomography specimen images—Datasets 2 & 3.
Figure 4Capsule ensembled ELM layers for achieving the feature extraction and classification accuracy.
Pseudo code for the proposed ensembled algorithm.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 For |
| 4 Features F = Capsule(I)//Using |
| Equations (2–4) |
| 5 Output Function= ELM(F)//Using |
| Equation 7 |
| 6 If Output = = threshold//User-based threshold |
| 7 COVID-19 is detected |
| 8 Else |
| 9 Normal Condition is detected |
| 10 End |
| 11 End |
| 12 End |
Figure 5Blockchain empowered federated learning models used in the proposed framework.
Comparative analysis of the different algorithms in detecting the COVID-19 using dataset 1.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| VGG-16 | 0.8269 | 0.833 | 0.8234 | 0.170 | 0.832 |
| VGG-19 | 0.833 | 0.843 | 0.823 | 0.173 | 0.840 |
| Alexnets | 0.834 | 0.823 | 0.814 | 0.189 | 0.826 |
| Resnets-50 | 0.845 | 0.823 | 0.832 | 0.164 | 0.834 |
| Resnets-100 | 0.849 | 0.843 | 0.834 | 0.167 | 0.838 |
| Inception V3 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.821 | 0.190 | 0.801 |
| Densenets-121 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.834 | 0.167 | 0.812 |
| Desnsenet-119 | 0.78 | 0.793 | 0.80 | 0.200 | 0.80 |
| Densenets-150 | 0.81 | 0.802 | 0.794 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| Mobilenets | 0.782 | 0.784 | 0.778 | 0.783 | 0.778 |
| SegCaps | 0.89 | 0.934 | 0.923 | 0.07 | 0.930 |
| Proposed model | 0.982 | 0.973 | 0.965 | 0.0335 | 0.970 |
Figure 6(A–C) Training—validation curves for the proposed algorithm for different datasets.
Figure 7Loss validation curves for the proposed algorithm for different datasets.
Figure 8Performance metrics of the proposed algorithm with the different datasets.
Comparative analysis of the different algorithms in detecting the COVID-19 using dataset 2.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| VGG-16 | 0.797 | 0.783 | 0.7563 | 0.289 | 0.789 |
| VGG-19 | 0.732 | 0.743 | 0.723 | 0.273 | 0.7390 |
| Alexnets | 0.804 | 0.783 | 0.784 | 0.229 | 0.806 |
| Resnets-50 | 0.80 | 0.801 | 0.802 | 0.200 | 0.812 |
| Resnets-100 | 0.840 | 0.838 | 0.836 | 0.177 | 0.82 |
| Inception V3 | 0.678 | 0.677 | 0.675 | 0.675 | 0.681 |
| Densenets-121 | 0.790 | 0.784 | 0.779 | 0.221 | 0.79 |
| Desnsenet-119 | 0.777 | 0.781 | 0.78 | 0.229 | 0.774 |
| Densenets-150 | 0.80 | 0.792 | 0.789 | 0.728 | 0.73 |
| Mobilenets | 0.782 | 0.784 | 0.783 | 0.773 | 0.753 |
| SegCaps | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.910 | 0.09 | 0.910 |
| ProposedModel | 0.982 | 0.973 | 0.965 | 0.335 | 0.970 |
Comparative analysis of the different algorithms in detecting the COVID-19 using dataset 3.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| VGG-16 | 0.8269 | 0.833 | 0.8234 | 0.170 | 0.832 |
| VGG-19 | 0.833 | 0.843 | 0.823 | 0.173 | 0.840 |
| Alexnets | 0.834 | 0.823 | 0.814 | 0.189 | 0.826 |
| Resnets-50 | 0.845 | 0.823 | 0.832 | 0.164 | 0.834 |
| Resnets-100 | 0.849 | 0.843 | 0.834 | 0.167 | 0.838 |
| Inception V3 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.821 | 0.190 | 0.801 |
| Densenets-121 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.834 | 0.167 | 0.812 |
| Desnsenet-119 | 0.78 | 0.793 | 0.80 | 0.200 | 0.80 |
| Densenets-150 | 0.81 | 0.802 | 0.794 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| Mobilenets | 0.782 | 0.784 | 0.778 | 0.783 | 0.778 |
| SegCaps | 0.89 | 0.934 | 0.923 | 0.07 | 0.930 |
| ProposedModel | 0.982 | 0.973 | 0.965 | 0.335 | 0.970 |
Comparative analysis between the blockchain-based learning models for COVID-19 detection of diseases using dataset 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parnian et al. ( | ResNETS | High | 89.5 | No | No |
| He et al. ( | 2D-CNN | High | 85.4 | No | No |
| Rahimzadeh et al. ( | Federated Capsule network learning | High | 91 | Medium | Yes |
| Ours | Federated Ensembled capsule networks | High | 98.5 | High | Yes |
Comparative analysis between the blockchain-based learning models for COVID-19 detection of diseases using dataset 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parnian et al. ( | ResNETS | High | 89.5 | No | No |
| He et al. ( | 2D-CNN | High | 85.4 | No | No |
| Rahimzadeh et al. ( | Federated capsule network learning | High | 91 | Medium | Yes |
| Ours | Federated Ensembled capsule networks | High | 98.5 | High | Yes |
Comparative analysis between the blockchain-based model with other learning.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Parnian et al. ( | ResNETS | O(n2n) | 6.92 MB |
| He et al. ( | 2D-CNN | O(n2n−1) | 5.54 MB |
| Rahimzadeh et al. ( | Federated capsule network learning | O(n2n−5) | 3.25 MB |
| Ours | Federated ensembled capsule networks | O(n2n−5) | 2.85 MB |
Comparative analysis between the blockchain-based learning models for COVID-19 detection of diseases using dataset 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parnian et al. ( | ResNETS | Very High | 88.4 | No | No |
| He et al. ( | 2D-CNN | Very High | 83.3 | No | No |
| Rahimzadeh et al. ( | Federated Capsule network learning | Very High | 89 | Medium | Yes |
| Ours | Federated Ensembled capsule networks | Very High | 98.5 | High | Yes |