Literature DB >> 35784192

Dayside Transient Phenomena and Their Impact on the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere.

Hui Zhang1,2, Qiugang Zong3,4, Hyunju Connor1,5, Peter Delamere1, Gábor Facskó6,7, Desheng Han8, Hiroshi Hasegawa9, Esa Kallio10, Árpád Kis11, Guan Le5, Bertrand Lembège12, Yu Lin13, Terry Liu1,14, Kjellmar Oksavik15,16, Nojan Omidi17, Antonius Otto1, Jie Ren3, Quanqi Shi2, David Sibeck5, Shutao Yao2.   

Abstract

Dayside transients, such as hot flow anomalies, foreshock bubbles, magnetosheath jets, flux transfer events, and surface waves, are frequently observed upstream from the bow shock, in the magnetosheath, and at the magnetopause. They play a significant role in the solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. Foreshock transient phenomena, associated with variations in the solar wind dynamic pressure, deform the magnetopause, and in turn generates field-aligned currents (FACs) connected to the auroral ionosphere. Solar wind dynamic pressure variations and transient phenomena at the dayside magnetopause drive magnetospheric ultra low frequency (ULF) waves, which can play an important role in the dynamics of Earth's radiation belts. These transient phenomena and their geoeffects have been investigated using coordinated in-situ spacecraft observations, spacecraft-borne imagers, ground-based observations, and numerical simulations. Cluster, THEMIS, Geotail, and MMS multi-mission observations allow us to track the motion and time evolution of transient phenomena at different spatial and temporal scales in detail, whereas ground-based experiments can observe the ionospheric projections of transient magnetopause phenomena such as waves on the magnetopause driven by hot flow anomalies or flux transfer events produced by bursty reconnection across their full longitudinal and latitudinal extent. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), hybrid, and particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations are powerful tools to simulate the dayside transient phenomena. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the present understanding of dayside transient phenomena at Earth and other planets, their geoeffects, and outstanding questions.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bow shock; Flux transfer events; Mirror mode; Surface waves; Transient foreshock phenomena; Ultra-low frequency waves

Year:  2022        PMID: 35784192      PMCID: PMC9239986          DOI: 10.1007/s11214-021-00865-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Space Sci Rev        ISSN: 0038-6308            Impact factor:   8.943


  32 in total

1.  Transport of solar wind into Earth's magnetosphere through rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; M Fujimoto; T-D Phan; H Rème; A Balogh; M W Dunlop; C Hashimoto; R Tandokoro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mode conversion and anomalous transport in Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices and kinetic Alfvén waves at the Earth's magnetopause.

Authors:  C C Chaston; M Wilber; F S Mozer; M Fujimoto; M L Goldstein; M Acuna; H Reme; A Fazakerley
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Autogenous and efficient acceleration of energetic ions upstream of Earth's bow shock.

Authors:  D L Turner; L B Wilson; T Z Liu; I J Cohen; S J Schwartz; A Osmane; J F Fennell; J H Clemmons; J B Blake; J Westlake; B H Mauk; A N Jaynes; T Leonard; D N Baker; R J Strangeway; C T Russell; D J Gershman; L Avanov; B L Giles; R B Torbert; J Broll; R G Gomez; S A Fuselier; J L Burch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  On the generation of magnetosheath high-speed jets by bow shock ripples.

Authors:  H Hietala; F Plaschke
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.811

5.  Geoeffective jets impacting the magnetopause are very common.

Authors:  F Plaschke; H Hietala; V Angelopoulos; R Nakamura
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.811

6.  Turbulent mass transfer caused by vortex induced reconnection in collisionless magnetospheric plasmas.

Authors:  T K M Nakamura; H Hasegawa; W Daughton; S Eriksson; W Y Li; R Nakamura
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Wave-particle energy exchange directly observed in a kinetic Alfvén-branch wave.

Authors:  Daniel J Gershman; Adolfo F-Viñas; John C Dorelli; Scott A Boardsen; Levon A Avanov; Paul M Bellan; Steven J Schwartz; Benoit Lavraud; Victoria N Coffey; Michael O Chandler; Yoshifumi Saito; William R Paterson; Stephen A Fuselier; Robert E Ergun; Robert J Strangeway; Christopher T Russell; Barbara L Giles; Craig J Pollock; Roy B Torbert; James L Burch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Relativistic electrons generated at Earth's quasi-parallel bow shock.

Authors:  Terry Z Liu; Vassilis Angelopoulos; San Lu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Determining EMIC Wave Vector Properties Through Multi-Point Measurements: The Wave Curl Analysis.

Authors:  S K Vines; B J Anderson; R C Allen; R E Denton; M J Engebretson; J R Johnson; S Toledo-Redondo; J H Lee; D L Turner; R E Ergun; R J Strangeway; C T Russell; H Wei; R B Torbert; S A Fuselier; B L Giles; J L Burch
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 2.811

10.  Effects of Subauroral Polarization Streams on the Upper Thermospheric Winds During Non-Storm Time.

Authors:  Ying Zou; Larry R Lyons; Xueling Shi; Jiang Liu; Qian Wu; Mark Conde; Simon G Shepherd; Stephen Mende; Yongliang Zhang; Antea Coster
Journal:  J Geophys Res Space Phys       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.