Literature DB >> 30209369

Autogenous and efficient acceleration of energetic ions upstream of Earth's bow shock.

D L Turner1, L B Wilson2, T Z Liu3, I J Cohen4, S J Schwartz5, A Osmane6,7, J F Fennell8, J H Clemmons8, J B Blake8, J Westlake4, B H Mauk4, A N Jaynes9, T Leonard10, D N Baker10, R J Strangeway3, C T Russell3, D J Gershman2, L Avanov2, B L Giles2, R B Torbert11,12, J Broll12,13, R G Gomez8, S A Fuselier12,13, J L Burch12.   

Abstract

Earth and its magnetosphere are immersed in the supersonic flow of the solar-wind plasma that fills interplanetary space. As the solar wind slows and deflects to flow around Earth, or any other obstacle, a 'bow shock' forms within the flow. Under almost all solar-wind conditions, planetary bow shocks such as Earth's are collisionless, supercritical shocks, meaning that they reflect and accelerate a fraction of the incident solar-wind ions as an energy dissipation mechanism1,2, which results in the formation of a region called the ion foreshock3. In the foreshock, large-scale, transient phenomena can develop, such as 'hot flow anomalies'4-9, which are concentrations of shock-reflected, suprathermal ions that are channelled and accumulated along certain structures in the upstream magnetic field. Hot flow anomalies evolve explosively, often resulting in the formation of new shocks along their upstream edges5,10, and potentially contribute to particle acceleration11-13, but there have hitherto been no observations to constrain this acceleration or to confirm the underlying mechanism. Here we report observations of a hot flow anomaly accelerating solar-wind ions from roughly 1-10 kiloelectronvolts up to almost 1,000 kiloelectronvolts. The acceleration mechanism depends on the mass and charge state of the ions and is consistent with first-order Fermi acceleration14,15. The acceleration that we observe results from only the interaction of Earth's bow shock with the solar wind, but produces a much, much larger number of energetic particles compared to what would typically be produced in the foreshock from acceleration at the bow shock. Such autogenous and efficient acceleration at quasi-parallel bow shocks (the normal direction of which are within about 45 degrees of the interplanetary magnetic field direction) provides a potential solution to Fermi's 'injection problem', which requires an as-yet-unexplained seed population of energetic particles, and implies that foreshock transients may be important in the generation of cosmic rays at astrophysical shocks throughout the cosmos.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209369      PMCID: PMC6347969          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0472-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   69.504


  3 in total

1.  Relativistic Electrons Produced by Foreshock Disturbances Observed Upstream of Earth's Bow Shock.

Authors:  L B Wilson; D G Sibeck; D L Turner; A Osmane; D Caprioli; V Angelopoulos
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Chemical Enhancements in Shock-Accelerated Particles: Ab initio Simulations.

Authors:  Damiano Caprioli; Dennis T Yi; Anatoly Spitkovsky
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Simultaneous acceleration of protons and electrons at nonrelativistic quasiparallel collisionless shocks.

Authors:  Jaehong Park; Damiano Caprioli; Anatoly Spitkovsky
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 9.161

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Laboratory Observations of Ultra-Low Frequency Analogue Waves Driven by the Right-Hand Resonant Ion Beam Instability.

Authors:  Peter V Heuer; Martin S Weidl; Robert S Dorst; Derek B Schaeffer; Shreekrishna K P Tripathi; Stephen Vincena; Carmen G Constantin; Christoph Niemann; Lynn B Wilson; Dan Winske
Journal:  Astrophys J Lett       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 7.413

Review 2.  Dayside Transient Phenomena and Their Impact on the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Qiugang Zong; Hyunju Connor; Peter Delamere; Gábor Facskó; Desheng Han; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Esa Kallio; Árpád Kis; Guan Le; Bertrand Lembège; Yu Lin; Terry Liu; Kjellmar Oksavik; Nojan Omidi; Antonius Otto; Jie Ren; Quanqi Shi; David Sibeck; Shutao Yao
Journal:  Space Sci Rev       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.943

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.