Literature DB >> 35784089

Sequence comparison of the mitochondrial genomes of five brackish water species of the family Neritidae: Phylogenetic implications and divergence time estimation.

Jing Miao1, Jiantong Feng1, Xiaojuan Liu2, Chengrui Yan1, Yingying Ye1, Jiji Li1, Kaida Xu3, Baoying Guo1, Zhenming Lü1.   

Abstract

Neritids are ancient gastropod species which can live in marine, brackish water, and freshwater environments. In this study, we sequenced and annotated the mitochondrial genomes of five brackish water neritids (i.e., Clithon corona, Clithon lentiginosum, Clithon squarrosum, Neritina iris, and Septaria lineata). The mitogenomes ranged from 15,618 to 15,975 bp, and all contain 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 tRNA genes, and two rRNA genes, with a closed ring structure. We calculated the Ka/Ks values of all 13 PCGs of Neritidae species, all ratios are less than 1, under purification selection. Phylogenetic analysis of the 13 PCGs showed that Neritimorpha is a sister group with Vetigastropoda and Caenogastopoda, genus Clithon is a sister group with Neritina and Septaria. Estimation of divergence time for all species of Neritidae showed that the main differentiation of Neritidae occurred in Cenozoic period (65 Mya), C. corona and C. lentiginosum were differentiated in the Cenozoic Neogene, the other three species diverged in the Cenozoic Paleogene. These results will help to better understand the evolutionary position of Neritidae and provide reference for further phylogenetic research on Neritidae species.
© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neritid; divergence time; mitogenome; phylogenetic

Year:  2022        PMID: 35784089      PMCID: PMC9170520          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   3.167


INTRODUCTION

Neritidae (Gastropoda: Neritimorpha: Cycloneritida) is one of the most diverse taxa in the Neritimorpha (Rafinesque, 1815). At present, there are 16 genera, comprising around 280 species (Hamish et al., 2007), with about 40 species having been found on the southeast coast of China before 2008 (Zhang, 2008). The fossil record of neritids dates back to the late Cretaceous (Kano, 2002), showing ecological radiation and extreme diversity in form. Neritids occur mainly in intertidal zone (Sasaki et al., 2002). They are euryhaline, and can live in marine, brackish water, and freshwater ecosystems, Nerita species are almost exclusively found in marine environments, Clithon and Neritina animals are mostly found in freshwater and brackish water environments (Tan & Clements, 2008). There have been at least five or six evolutionary transitions from hypersaline environments to freshwater in the evolutionary history of Neritidae (Frey, 2010; Holthuis, 1995). However, most freshwater lineages retain a dispersed planktonic marine larval stage, in which adults develop, reproduce in rivers, hatch larvae enter the sea, grow into adults, and return to freshwater in a cycle (Abdou et al., 2015). The metazoan mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) is a double‐stranded molecular structure in the form of a closed ring. It usually has 37 coding genes, including 13 protein‐coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA), 22 transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) genes, and a noncoding control region (CR) (Fernández‐Silva et al., 2003; Wolstenholme & David, 1992). The mitogenome is characterized by high conservation, lack of extensive recombination, maternal inheritance, and a high mutation rate (Curole & Kocher, 1999; William et al., 2004). Compared with some gene fragments, such as COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1) and 16S rRNA, mitogenome sequences can better elucidate evolutionary relationships between species, it has been widely used in phylogenetic researches (Zardoya & Meyer, 1996). Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) have been widely used in phylogenetic analysis, and the study of Neritidae classification has been ongoing for a long period. However, there are insufficient studies on the mitochondrial data and divergence time of neritids. In this study, we chose five neritid species: Clithon corona, Clithon lentiginosum, Clithon squarrosum, Neritina iris, and Septaria lineata, which can live in both fresh and brackish water environments. After sequencing, assembly, annotation, and analysis of the complete mitogenome, we analyzed their basic characteristics in the five species, calculated the average nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratio (Ka/Ks) of 19 Neritidae species, constructed the phylogenetic tree of mitogenomes of Gastropoda to analyze the phylogenetic position and relationship in Neritidae, and speculated the differentiation time of neritids.

MATREIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Five species of Neritidae C. corona, N. iris, S. lineata, C. squarrosum, and C. lentiginosum were collected from the coastal area of Huizhou, Guangdong Province, China (Table 1). The preliminary morphological identification of these samples was carried out by consulting the taxonomic experts of the Marine Biological Museum of Zhejiang Ocean University. Store samples in absolute ethanol, take a small piece of fresh foot tissue to extract total DNA by salting‐out method (Aljanabi & Martinez, 1997), and store at −20°C.
TABLE 1

Sampling locations and dates for the five samples

Species nameSampling dateSampling location
Clithon corona September 2020114°55′17.66″E, 22°73′54.44″N
Clithon lentiginosum October 2020114°72 ′56.06″E, 22°79′94.94″N
Clithon squarrosum October 2020114°72 ′81.75″E, 22°79′92.06″N
Neritina iris September 2020114°54′55.86″E, 22°73′86.77″N
Septaria lineata September 2020114°55 ′61.32″E, 22°73′43.02″N
Sampling locations and dates for the five samples

Mitogenome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

The complete mitogenomes of five species were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq X Ten platform by Origingene Bio‐pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The Covaris M220 physical method (ultrasonic) was used to fragment the DNA, and the length of the fragments was 300−500 bp. Then, the DNA fragments were purified to construct a sequencing library. The Illumina HiSeq™ platform was used for sequencing after library quality inspection, and a 10 Gb data volume was used for sequencing. Data quality control was performed by Trimmomatic v0.39 (http://www.usadellab.org/cms/index.php?page=trimmomatic) (Bolger et al., 2014), filter out low‐quality reads, duplicated reads, sequences with an “N” rate greater than 10%, and sequencing linker sequences. Clean data with high quality was obtained and the reads of the five species were de novo assembled using NOVOPlasty assembly software (https://github.com/ndierckx/NOVOPlasty) (Dierckxsens et al., 2017). The stack cluster was compared with reference genome in the GenBank database, and majority of the mitogenome sequence information was obtained. Then, the online software MITOS (http://mitos.bioinf.uni‐leipzig.de/index.py) was used for structural and functional annotation and manual correction (Bernt et al., 2013), the complete mitogenome was finally obtained. Sequenced mitogenomes were uploaded to GenBank database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

Sequence analysis

Circular genome visualization of five species was generated using the online CGView server (http://cgview.ca/) (Stothard & Wishart, 2005). The nucleotide composition and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of each protein‐coding gene were calculated using MEGA‐X (Kumar et al., 2018). The AT‐skew and GC‐skew computation formulae were as follows: AT‐skew = (A − T)/(A + T), GC‐skew = (G − C)/(G + C) (Hassanin et al., 2005). The Ka/Ks ratio of the five mitogenomes was estimated using DnaSP 6.0 (Rozas et al., 2017).

Phylogenetic analyses

The phylogenetic analyses of the five species were performed using the sequences of complete mitogenomes from 81 species (Table 2). A total of 74 Gastropoda species from Neritimorpha, Vetigastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Patellogastropoda, and Heterobranchia were downloaded from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) for phylogenetic analysis. Two Veneridae species Dosinia troscheli (NC_037917) and Dosinia japonica (NC_038063) were used as outgroups. The sequence of the 13 PCGs of each specie were identified using DAMBE 7 (Xia, 2018), the PCGs of each sample were concatenated together in the same order, the tree building sequence set was obtained by combining them in a unified sequence. The PCGs sequences of these 81 species were aligned using ClustalW of MEGA‐X. Nucleotide substitution saturation was analyzed using DAMBE 7 to evaluate whether these sequences were suitable for phylogenetic tree construction.
TABLE 2

List of Gastropoda species used in phylogenetic analysis with their GenBank accession numbers, and five newly sequenced Neritid species were marked with✽

SubclassFamilySpeciesSize (bp)Accession no.
HeterobranchiaPlacobranchidae Elysia cornigera 14,118NC_035489
Plakobranchus ocellatus 14,173AP014544
Aplysiidae Aplysia dactylomela 14,128DQ991927
Aplysia kurodai 14,131KF148053
Onchidiidae Peronia peronii 13,968JN619346
Platevindex mortoni 13,991NC_013934
Ellobiidae Myosotella myosotis 14,246NC_012434
Auriculinella bidentata 14,135JN606066
Ellobium chinense 13,979NC_034292
Carychium tridentatum 13,908KT696545
Ovatella vulcani 14,274JN615139
Volvatellidae Ascobulla fragilis 14,745AY345022
Siphonariidae Siphonaria gigas 14,514NC_016188
Siphonaria pectinata 14,065NC_012383
Polyceridae Nembrotha kubaryana 14,395NC_034920
Roboastra europaea 14,472NC_004321
Notodoris gardineri 14,424NC_015111
PatellogastropodaNacellidae Nacella clypeater 16,742KT990124
Nacella magellanica 16,663KT990125
Nacella concinna 16,761KT990126
Cellana grata 16,181MW722939
Cellana nigrolineata 16,153LC600801
Cellana radiata 16,194MH916651
Patellidae Patella ferruginea 14,400MH916654
Patella pellucida 14,949OU795045.1
Patella vulgata 14,808MH916653
Pectinodontidae Bathyacmaea lactea 18,446MW309841
Bathyacmaea nipponica 16,792MF095859
CaenogastropodaMuricidae Ceratostoma burnetti 15,334NC_046569
Ceratostoma rorifluum 15,338MK411750
Ocinebrellus falcatus 15,326NC_046052
Boreotrophon candelabrum 15,265NC_046505
Conidae Conus betulinus 16,240NC_039922
Conus tulipa 15,756KR006970
Naticidae Euspira gilva 15,315NC_046593
Euspira pila 15,244NC_046703
Mammilla kurodai 15,309NC_046596
Pomatiopsidae Oncomelania quadrasi 15,184LC276227
Muricidae Chicoreus torrefactus 15,359NC_039164
Indothais lacera 15,272NC_037221
Rapana venosa 15,272NC_011193
Menathais tuberosa 15,294NC_031405
Clavatulidae Turricula nelliae spuria 16,453MK251986
Turritella bacillum 15,868NC_029717
VetigastropodaTurbinidae Angaria neglecta 19,470NC_028707
Astralium haematragum 16,310NC_031858
Bolma rugosa 17,432NC_029366
Lunella granulate 17,190NC_031857
Tegulidae Chlorostoma argyrostomum 17,780KX298892
Omphalius nigerrimus 17,755NC_031862
Tegula brunnea 17,690NC_016954
Tegula lividomaculata 17,375NC_029367
Haliotidae Haliotis iris 17,131NC_031361
Trochidae Gibbula umbilicalis 16,277NC_035682
Monodonta labio 16,440MK240320
Stomatella planulata 17,151NC_031861
Umbonium thomasi 15,998MH729882
Peltospiridae Chrysomallon squamiferum 15,388AP013032
Gigantopelta aegis 15,176MT312227
Phasianellidae Phasianella solida 16,698NC_028709
NeritimorphaNeritidae Clithon corona* 15,975MZ189741
Clithon lentiginosum* 15,885MZ152905
Clithon squarrosum* 15,905MZ297477
Clithon oualaniense 15,705MT568501
Clithon retropictus 15,802NC_037238
Clithon sowerbianum 15,919MT230542
Neritina iris* 15,618MZ189742
Neritina violacea 15,710KY021066
Septaria lineata* 15,697MZ315041
Nerita albicilla 15,314MK516738
Nerita balteata 15,571MN477253
Nerita chamaeleon 15,716MT161611
Nerita undata 15,583MN477254
Nerita versicolor 15,866KF728890
Nerita fulgurans 15,343KF728888
Nerita tessellata 15,741KF728889
Nerita japonica 15,875MN747116
Nerita melanotragus 15,261GU810158
Nerita yoldii 15,719MK395169
List of Gastropoda species used in phylogenetic analysis with their GenBank accession numbers, and five newly sequenced Neritid species were marked with✽ The Bayesian inference (BI) method of the program MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist et al., 2012) and the maximum likelihood (ML) method of IQ‐tree 2.1.3 (Minh et al., 2020) were used to analyze the phylogenetic relationships. The Bayesian method model measurement firstly used PAUP 4 (Swofford, 2002) software for format conversion, and then used MRMTGUI (Nuin, 2005) software to associate PAUP 4, ModelTest 3.7 (Posada, 2005) and MRModelTest 2.3 (Nylander et al., 2004) programs to determine the best alternative model under the Akaike information criterion (AIC) as GTR + I + G. BI analysis was performed using two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) run with 2 million generations, and sampling was performed once every 1000 generations. the first 25% of trees were discarded as burn‐in, and convergence for independent operation was evaluated using the mean standard deviation of the splitting frequency (<0.01). The ML tree best fit replacement model (GTR + F + I + G4) selected by Bayesian information criterion (BIC) using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017), setting the boot copy number with 1000 ultra‐fast bootstraps in order to reconstruct the consensus tree. Finally, the phylogenetic tree was viewed, edited, and visualized using the Figtree 1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2018) software.

Estimation of divergence times

Twenty Neritimorpha species were chosen to estimate the divergence time, including 19 species in Neritidae, and Pleuropoma jana from family Helicinidae. Based on the 13 PCGs datasets at the nucleotide level, we used a Bayesian tree as the framework to estimate the divergence time of the Neritimorpha species. The analysis was performed using the BEAST 1.8.4 software (Drummond et al., 2012). We used an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed molecular clock model. The Yule process was used for the tree prior, and divergence time calibration was used for the distribution of standard points of fossils. The MCMC was analyzed twice, with 100 million generations each, and sampled once every 1000 generations. Ten percent of samples discarded as a burn‐in by TreeAnnotator 1.8.4 package in BEAST. Tracer 1.6 (Rambaut & Suchard, 2014) was used to verify chain convergence and majority values exceed the effective sample size (ESS) of 200. Calibration points of divergent time was determined from the reported fossil record. At present study, we specify two calibration points as priors and use a normal distribution. The first calibration point, based on the Mesozoic Triassic period, is that Pleuropoma jana is limited from 235 to 223 million years ago (Mya) (Uribe, Kano, et al., 2016). Based on the Mesozoic Cretaceous Nerita melanotragus fossil record (95–80 Mya) (Postaire et al., 2014), 80 Mya was set as another calibration point with a standard deviation of 2.0. A public repository of time scale information on evolution Timetree (http://www.timetree.org/) (Hedges et al., 2006), we used reported results to verify the accuracy of the divergence time (Frey & Vermeij, 2008; Postaire et al., 2014; Uribe et al., 2019). Finally, the Figtree 1.4.4 (Rambaut, 2018) software was used to edit the divergence time tree.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Genome structure, composition, and skewness

The complete mitogenome sequences of the five Nerita species consist of 15,975 bp (C. corona), 15,885 bp (C. lentiginosum), 15,905 bp (C. squarrosum), 15,618 bp (N. iris), and 15,697 bp (S. lineata), the smallest being for N. iris and the largest for C. corona. The GenBank accession numbers are MZ189741, MZ152905, MZ297477, MZ189742, and MZ315041, respectively (Figure 1). They are all closed, circular, double‐stranded DNA molecules, containing 37 typical coding genes, including 13 PCGs, 22 tRNA genes, two rRNA genes (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), and a control region (CR). Among them, 15 genes (seven PCGs and eight tRNA genes) are located on the heavy chain, while the others were located on the light chain (Figure 1). The longest gene was ND5, with a length of 1702 to 1717 bp, and the shortest was the ATP8 gene, with a consistent length of only 165 bp (Table 3).
FIGURE 1

Complete mitogenome map of five neritid species

TABLE 3

Composition and skewness in the mitogenomes of five neritid species

Cc/ClSize(bp)A(%)T(%)G(%)C(%)A+T(%)AT‐skewSize(bp)A(%)T(%)G(%)C(%)A+T(%)AT‐skew
Mitogenome15,97530.6634.0620.2415.0464.72−0.0515,88530.6134.1620.1515.0864.77−0.05
COI154822.2939.8622.2215.6362.15−0.28154822.2240.2522.1615.3762.47−0.29
COII69028.1236.5220.5814.7864.64−0.1369027.6835.8020.8715.6563.48−0.13
ATP816529.7043.6418.188.4873.34−0.1916528.4844.2419.397.8872.72−0.22
ATP669922.1742.4919.8915.4564.66−0.3170222.2242.3119.8015.6764.53−0.31
COIII78020.6439.2323.8516.2859.87−0.3178020.2638.9724.1016.6759.23−0.32
ND335420.6244.3524.0111.0264.97−0.3735420.6244.3524.0111.0264.97−0.37
ND193326.8036.0116.5120.6962.81−0.1593326.6936.8717.0419.4063.56−0.16
ND5171728.7733.9514.5022.7762.72−0.08170229.3834.9613.2222.4464.34−0.09
ND4123327.6636.0914.4421.8263.75−0.13125428.0735.3314.5122.0963.40−0.11
ND4L29428.5734.6917.6919.0563.26−0.1029429.2535.3716.6718.7164.62−0.09
ND650126.5539.5213.9719.9666.07−0.2050126.5540.7214.1718.5667.27−0.21
Cytb113725.4237.7316.1820.6763.15−0.19113726.0337.3815.9220.6763.41−0.18
ND2100321.4441.5824.7312.2663.02−0.32100322.9340.8823.2312.9663.81−0.28
tRNAs141731.2632.5321.1015.1063.79−0.02148430.8032.2821.5015.4363.08−0.02
rRNAs219336.9830.6016.8715.5567.580.09219336.8930.6016.7815.7367.490.09
PCGs11,05425.1838.0918.6418.0863.27−0.2011,06325.4538.2018.3618.0063.65−0.20
Complete mitogenome map of five neritid species Composition and skewness in the mitogenomes of five neritid species In the five mitogenomes at present study, the average AT content was higher than CG, with a bias of 64.90%. The average AT‐skew was −0.0545, and GC‐skew was 0.1486 (Table 4). The base content of As was lower than that of Ts, and the base content of Gs was higher than that of Cs. In general, the average content of each species in the complete mitogenome was T > A > G > C (Table 3), which is consistent with the reported complete neritids mitogenomes (Arquez et al., 2014; Feng et al., 2020, 2021).
TABLE 4

Size and skewness in the mitogenomes of five neritid species

SpeciesSize(bp)mitogenomeSize(bp)PCGs
A + T%AT‐skewGC‐skewA + T%AT‐skewGC‐skew
Clithon corona 15,97564.72−0.05250.147311,05463.27−0.20420.0153
Clithon lentiginosum 15,88564.77−0.05480.143811,06363.65−0.20040.0099
Clithon squarrosum 15,90564.92−0.04920.154011,07863.48−0.19800.0138
Neritina iris 15,61864.34−0.07080.169711,14063.24−0.1813−0.0081
Septaria lineata 15,69765.75−0.04520.128411,14065.07−0.18800.0244
Average15,81664.90−0.05450.148611,09563.74−0.19440.0111
Size and skewness in the mitogenomes of five neritid species

Protein‐coding genes and codon usage

The mitogenome of the Neritidae in this study contains 13 PCGs, including a cytochrome b (Cyt b), two ATPases (ATP6 and ATP8), three cytochrome oxidases (COI–III), and seven NADH dehydrogenases (ND1–6 and ND4L). The length of the PCGs in these five species is between 11,054 and 11,140 bp (Table 3). The base composition of these species also showed a high AT bias, with the highest AT content being seen in S. lineata, at 65.75%. The AT bias values of each species were negative, in addition to N. iris at −0.07, the values of the other four species are −0.05, with the T base content being higher than that of the A base. In these five neritid species, the start codon was ATN, almost all genes initiated with ATG, and only a few genes initiated with ATA (Table 5). The majority of the 13 PCGs terminated with TAG or TAA as stop codons, and some of the PCGs terminated with T as an incomplete codon, which was often found in ND2 and ND5. This incomplete stop codon was usually supplemented during transcription to obtain a complete stop codon T(AA) (Ojala et al., 1981).
TABLE 5

Start and stop codons for PCGs of five neritid species

geneStart codon/stop codon
CcCsClNiSl
COIATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAA
COIIATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAG
ATP8ATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAA
ATP6ATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAA
ND5ATT/T(AA)ATT/TAAATT/T(AA)ATT/TAAATT/TAA
ND4ATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATT/TAAATA/TAA
ND4LATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAA
CytbATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAA
ND6ATT/TAAATT/TAAATT/TAAATT/TAAATT/TAA
ND1ATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAA
COIIIATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAAATG/TAA
ND3ATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAGATG/TAAATG/TAG
ND2ATG/T(AA)ATG/T(AA)ATG/T(AA)ATG/T(AA)ATG/T(AA)
Start and stop codons for PCGs of five neritid species The amino acid composition used in PCGs was relatively similar in all five species (Figure 2). The use of Leu, Lys, Ser, Phe, and Val were relatively frequent, and His and Arg were the least common amino acids. Comparing the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of five species, the result showed that the average frequency of GCU (Ala), CCU (Pro), UUA (Leu2), and ACU (Thr) codons were higher than others. The amino acid content and codon usage of the 13 PCGs in these five species are similar.
FIGURE 2

The frequency of mitochondrial PCG amino acids and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of five newly sequenced neritid mitogenomes

The frequency of mitochondrial PCG amino acids and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of five newly sequenced neritid mitogenomes

Transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and CR

Like other complete neritids mitogenomes, there are 22 tRNA genes in these five species, including two larger regions: MYCWQGE (tRNA‐Met, Tyr, Cys, Trp, Gln, Gly, Glu) and KARNI (tRNA‐Lys, Ala, Arg, Asn, Ile) between 12S rRNA and ND3, and separated by COIII gene. The other ten tRNAs are scattered between PCGs and rRNAs (Figure 1, Table 6). The average total length of the tRNAs is 1467 bp, ranging from 56 to 72 bp (Tables 4 and 7). All of the tRNAs show significant AT base bias, with an AT content of 63.23%. The AT‐skew and GC‐skew are −0.0187 and 0.1725, respectively, showing a slight bias toward the use of T and a large bias toward C (Table 4).
TABLE 6

Intergenic nucleotides of five neritid species

IntergenicCcClCsNiSlSummary
COI111111111111
COII−52111−5 to 2
tRNAAsp 000000
ATP8666666
ATP6312228222222–31
tRNAPhe 000000
ND5000000
tRNAHis 000000
ND4222222
ND4L444444
tRNAThr 889833–9
tRNASer(UCN)555555
Cytb101011101910–19
ND677713137/13
tRNAPro 111111
ND1000000
tRNALeu(UUR)0001440
tRNALeu(CUN)−25−25−25−25−22−22/−25
16S rRNA−4−4−8−10−10−4‐(−10)
tRNAVal −1−1−1−1−1−1
12S rRNA−1−1−1−1−1−1
tRNAMet 444554–5
tRNATyr 444564–6
tRNACys 000000
tRNATrp 000000
tRNAGln 000000
tRNAGly 2222132/13
tRNAGlu 891800816527578527–891
COIII272627313227–32
tRNALys 151519141914–19
tRNAAla 121212121212
tRNAArg 666252–6
tRNAAsn 101110101310–13
tRNAIle 111000/1
ND3333443/4
tRNASer(AGY)000000
ND2999999999999
TABLE 7

Length of the tRNAs and rRNAs of five neritid species

geneCcCsClNiSlSummary
tRNAAsp 666766666766/67
tRNAPhe 666666686866/68
tRNAHis 666666666666
tRNAThr 686868686868
tRNASer(UCN)656565656565
tRNAPro 666666666666
tRNALeu(UUR)686868686868
tRNALeu(CUN)707070566356~70
tRNAVal 676767686867/68
tRNAMet 686768676767/68
tRNATyr 686868686968/69
tRNACys 646464656464/65
tRNATrp 666666676666/67
tRNAGln 696969696969
tRNAGly 676768656565~68
tRNAGlu 666666666666
tRNALys 676767676767
tRNAAla 686868686868
tRNAArg 696969696969
tRNAAsn 727272727272
tRNAIle 696969697269/72
tRNASer(AGY)686868686968/69
16S rRNA132813331328133713361328~1337
12S rRNA865864865867868864~868
Intergenic nucleotides of five neritid species Length of the tRNAs and rRNAs of five neritid species The average length of the rRNAs is 2198 bp, with the shortest lengths of 16sRNA and 12sRNA being 1328 and 864 bp, respectively (Tables 4 and 7). These also show an AT base bias, with an AT content of 67.16%. Both the AT‐skew (0.0841) and GC‐skew (0.0405) are positive, indicating a bias toward A and G. In the complete mitogenome of the Neritidae, the control region (CR) is the largest noncoding region, and the mitochondrial CR of all neritid species in this study was located between tRNA‐Glu and COIII, with a length of 527–891 bp (Table 6). This area usually presents a high AT bias, being an A + T rich area. This is an essential element involved in mitogenome replication and transcription initiation (Fernández‐Silva et al., 2003).

Ka/Ks

Ka/Ks has been used as an effective way to understand the dynamic evolution of protein‐coding genes. Therefore, the Ka/Ks ratios of the 13 PCGs were calculated using the 19 sequenced Neritidae species in order to study the relationship between evolution and selection pressure (Figure 3). The results showed that the Ka/Ks ratios of the PCGs range from 0.053 for COI to 0.712 for ND6. COI has the lowest Ka/Ks value, suggesting that COI is under the lowest selective pressure to conserve the protein sequence. It is therefore widely used as a potential molecular marker in species identification and phylogenetic studies (Astrin et al., 2016).
FIGURE 3

The average nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratio (Ka/Ks) of all 13 PCGs of 19 Neritidae species

The average nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratio (Ka/Ks) of all 13 PCGs of 19 Neritidae species In general, a gene is considered to be positively selected only when the Ka/Ks ratio is greater than 1. The majority of the 13 PCGs genes of the species involved in this study had relatively lower Ka/Ks ratios, ratio is less than 1. Therefore, we suggest that these PCGs may be under the influence of purification selection.

Phylogenetic relationships

The 13 PCGs of the mitogenome of 79 species from five subclasses of Gastropoda (Vetigastropoda, Caenogramopoda, Neritimorpha, Patellogramopoda, and Heterobranchia) and other two species as outgroups were used to construct phylogenetic trees (Figure 4, Table 2). The result showed that the ML tree and BI tree have a consistent topological structure, therefore, only the topology of BI tree was displayed, with strong bootstrapping for the ML tree and posterior probability values.
FIGURE 4

The phylogenetic tree based on 13 PCGs were inferred using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. The number at each branch is the bootstrap probability and the five newly sequenced species are marked with blue dots

The phylogenetic tree based on 13 PCGs were inferred using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. The number at each branch is the bootstrap probability and the five newly sequenced species are marked with blue dots Our phylogenetic analysis showed that Neritimorpha is closely related to Caenogastopoda and Patellogastopoda, five subclasses within the Gastropoda show the following relationship: (((Vetigastropoda + Caenogastopoda) + Neritimorpha) + Patellogastopoda) + Heterobranchia, which was consistent with Feng et al. (2020, 2021). Kocot et al. (2011) analyze the phylogenetic relationships of Gastropoda species showing that Caenogastropoda and Heterobranchia were sister groups, and Neritimorpha is closely related to them, Patellogastropoda is on the outermost side of the phylogenetic tree. Osca et al. (2014) constructed a phylogenetic tree, finding a different result, Neritimorpha is closely related to Caenogastopoda, and then closely with Vetigastropoda. Subsequently, Uribe, Colgan, et al. (2016) added a subclass, Neomphalina, based on the research of Osca. This subclass is between Heterobranchia and Vetigastropoda in terms of evolutionary time. Zapata et al. (2014) assessed the various hypotheses that have been put forward about the inner branches of gastropod evolutionary trees in recent decades, concluding that Neritimorpha appeared on the outermost branch only once. The phylogenetic tree of the Neritidae showed that the genus Neritina and Septaria clustered together, as a sister group with Clithon, the genus Nerita is independently distributed in Neritimorpha. According to their living habits, Nerita species were the only organisms widely distributed in the marine environment. Species from the genus Neritina, Septaria, and Clithon were common in fresh and brackish water, so they had relatively closed evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic relationships analysis showed that all of Neritidae species were grouped together, all the posterior probability values were 1, and the bootstraps values were greater than 78. Using COI and 16s rRNA to conduct a phylogenetic tree, the results of Bunje and Lindberg (2007) show the genus Neritina and Septaria as sister groups, Nerita is a separate branch in the Neritidae. Chee and Mohd (2014) constructed a NJ tree using DNA barcoding of 12 species in the Neritidae, finding that Neritina and Clithon had a closed phylogenetic relationship, as sister groups with Nerita, this result was also consistent with recent research. Such branching results correspond to their living environment, species in Neritidae were distinguished by the difference in the salt content of the living environment.

Divergence times

Our results showed that Neritimorpha originated from about 216.53 Mya (95% highest posterior density (HPD) = 206.56–226.37 Mya) (Figure 5), which is close to previous studies (Feng et al., 2020, 2021). The first divergence of the Neritimorpha was in the Triassic period, the first period of Mesozoic, which was the transition period involving the disappearance of Paleozoic biota and the formation of post‐modern biota. During this period, the marine invertebrate fauna underwent great changes (Uribe, Kano, et al., 2016). In the Neritidae, the differentiation of the four genera occurred about 102.74 Mya, the results obtained from this analysis were slightly older than the age of the origin of the Spadonidae estimated in previous reports (Feng et al., 2020, 2021). This may be due to differences between results from the fossil record and different evolutionary classification methods, which are limited by their different areas of experience and expertise. Further revision of the fossil record of the genus is needed to address the attribution of the different genera.
FIGURE 5

Divergence time estimations based on 13 PCGs of 19 Neritimorpha species

Divergence time estimations based on 13 PCGs of 19 Neritimorpha species The genus Nerita was differentiated in 70.94 Mya, and other three genera were differentiated in 71.35 Mya. These five species differentiated in the Paleogene and Neogene of Cenozoic (23.03–65.50 Mya), the period of the emergence and evolution of modern organisms. The most striking effect of the Early Tertiary was the Himalayan movement: this was the period when the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau began to rise. At this time, the continental transgression of China decreased rapidly and marine sediments appeared in the marginal areas. This crustal movement might have contributed to the rapid differentiation of the neritids during this period.

CONCLUSIONS

We sequenced the complete mitogenomes of five species in Neritidae, and analyzed basic characteristics of gene sequences, found the genome size, gene order, and nucleotide composition were similar with previous findings. The Ka/Ks ratios of 13 PCGs in 19 Neritidae species showing that these genes were under purification selection. Phylogenetic analyses indicated genus Neritina and Septaria were sister groups, and clustered with Clithon, genus Nerita was a separate branch in Nreitidae. According to the estimation of divergence times, five species differentiated in the Cenozoic. This result provides a reference for the study of phylogenetic analysis and evolution research. In this study, three of five species belong to genus Clithon, data from genus Neritina and Septaria are limited, further studies are needed to follow up these findings and explore the evolutionary processes of neritids.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Jing Miao: Data curation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Jiantong Feng: Data curation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Xiaojuan Liu: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal). Chengrui Yan: Methodology (equal); Resources (equal). Yingying Ye: Funding acquisition (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Jiji Li: Funding acquisition (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Kaida Xu: Data curation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting). Baoying Guo: Data curation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting). Zhenming Lü: Data curation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All the authors declared no potential interest.
  34 in total

1.  Molecular phylogenies and historical biogeography of a circumtropical group of gastropods (Genus: Nerita): implications for regional diversity patterns in the marine tropics.

Authors:  Melissa A Frey; Geerat J Vermeij
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  DNA barcoding reveals neritid diversity (Mollusca: Gastropoda) diversity in Malaysian waters.

Authors:  S Y Chee; Siti Azizah Mohd Nor
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.514

3.  New patellogastropod mitogenomes help counteracting long-branch attraction in the deep phylogeny of gastropod mollusks.

Authors:  Juan E Uribe; Iker Irisarri; José Templado; Rafael Zardoya
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets.

Authors:  Julio Rozas; Albert Ferrer-Mata; Juan Carlos Sánchez-DelBarrio; Sara Guirao-Rico; Pablo Librado; Sebastián E Ramos-Onsins; Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Sequence and comparison of mitochondrial genomes in the genus Nerita (Gastropoda: Neritimorpha: Neritidae) and phylogenetic considerations among gastropods.

Authors:  Moises Arquez; Donald Colgan; Lyda R Castro
Journal:  Mar Genomics       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation.

Authors:  Matthias Bernt; Alexander Donath; Frank Jühling; Fabian Externbrink; Catherine Florentz; Guido Fritzsch; Joern Pütz; Martin Middendorf; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 8.  Replication and transcription of mammalian mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Patricio Fernández-Silva; José A Enriquez; Julio Montoya
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Marc A Suchard; Dong Xie; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data.

Authors:  Nicolas Dierckxsens; Patrick Mardulyn; Guillaume Smits
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.