| Literature DB >> 35783943 |
Yanjun Du1, Yuan Zhao2, Shupeng Dong3, Guoke Chen4, Xinyang Wang1, Keping Ma4.
Abstract
Studying the distribution of samara species is of ecological and economic significance. This information helps us with understanding species dispersal mechanisms, evaluating the risk of invasive species, and the management of ecological forests. However, limited research has explored, on a large scale, the geographic distribution of samara species and their influential abiotic factors. Here, we use the distribution data of 835 vascular samara species and growth form data to explore their geographic patterns in China and the environmental determinants. We divided China into 984 grid cells and examined the relationship between the proportion of samara species and climate variables using both ordinary and spatial linear regressions for each grid cell. Total samara species richness is higher in southern China in low altitude regions and the proportion of woody samara species is significantly higher than that of herbaceous samara species. The proportion of woody samara species is higher in the northeast regions where precipitation is sufficient, winters are dry and mild, and temperature seasonality and land surface relief degree values are high. Annual precipitation and temperature seasonality are the most important climatic drivers for the distribution of woody samara species. In contrast, herbaceous samara species prefer to distribute to the areas where climate is warm and dry but have higher temperature seasonality. Temperature related variables (mean annual temperature, mean diurnal range, and temperature seasonality) are the most important drivers for the distribution of herbaceous samara species. Samara species can better adapt to climatic regions with large temperature fluctuations and dry winters. The present distribution patterns of samara species are formed by the combined adaptation of fruit traits and growth form to climate. This work contributes to predictions of the global distribution of samara species under future climate change scenarios and conservation and management for the samara species.Entities:
Keywords: climate variability; dispersal; distribution; fruit type; functional traits; species diversity; species richness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783943 PMCID: PMC9249021 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Distribution of samara species richness across China. Species richness was calculated within a 100 × 100 km grid. (A) Total species; (B) woody species; (C) herbaceous species.
Figure 2Regression analysis between the richness of total (left), woody (middle), and herbaceous (right) samara species and latitude (A), longitude (B), and altitude (C).
Figure 3Distribution of the proportion of samara species across China. Species proportion was calculated within a 100 × 100 km grid. (A) Total species; (B) woody species; (C) herbaceous species.
Figure 4Regression analysis between the proportion of total (left), woody (middle), and herbaceous (right) samara species and latitude (A), longitude (B), and altitude (C).
Results of multiple linear regression (OLS) models for all environmental variables and the proportion of total, woody, and herbaceous samara species to total species.
|
| VIF | Dev, % | AIC | Moran’s I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Sqrt(AP) | 14.66*** | 3.43 | - | - | - |
| TS | 16.44*** | 2.05 | - | - | - |
| MAT | 9.99*** | 2.26 | |||
| MTCQ | 5.42*** | 1.73 | - | - | - |
| Sqrt(PDQ) | −5.07*** | 3.17 | - | - | - |
| ARI | 3.22** | 1.52 | - | - | - |
| - | - | 46.91 | 1,271 | 0.219*** | |
|
| |||||
| Sqrt(AP) | 18.75*** | 3.37 | - | - | - |
| TS | 18.51*** | 2.54 | - | - | - |
| Sqrt(PDQ) | −10.21*** | 3.05 | |||
| MTCQ | 8.19*** | 1.68 | |||
| ARI | 2.43** | 1.41 | - | - | - |
| - | - | 40.67 | 1,275 | 0.312*** | |
|
| |||||
| MAT | 8.74*** | 2.36 | - | - | - |
| TS | 9.92*** | 1.63 | - | - | - |
| MDR | −8.18*** | 3.66 | - | - | - |
| Sqrt(AP) | −3.97*** | 3.65 | - | - | - |
| MTCQ | 3.11** | 1.59 | - | - | - |
| - | - | 34.03 | 1,095 | 0.098*** | |
***p < 0.001, **0.001 < p < 0.01, *0.01 < p < 0.05.
AP, mean annual precipitation; MAT, mean annual temperature; TS, temperature seasonality; MTCQ, the temperature of the coldest quarter; MDR, mean diurnal range; ARI, relief degree of land surface; PDQ, precipitation of the driest quarter; unique-R.
Figure 5Relative importance of each climatic variable in the multi-linear models. (A) Total species; (B) woody species; (C) herbaceous species.
Results of simultaneous autoregressive error (SAR) models for all environmental variables and the proportion of total, woody, and herbaceous samara species to total species.
|
| Pseudo- | AIC | Moran’s I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Sqrt(AP) | 2.34* | - | - | - |
| TS | 1.41* | - | - | - |
| MTCQ | 1.04 | - | - | - |
| MAT | 2.89** | - | - | - |
| ARI | 2.07* | - | - | - |
| Sqrt(PDQ) | −0.15 | - | - | - |
| - | - | 60.78 | 994 | −0.007 |
|
| ||||
| Sqrt(AP) | 3.92*** | - | - | - |
| TS | 3.12** | - | - | - |
| MTCQ | 2.53* | - | - | - |
| PDQ | −0.78 | - | - | - |
| ARI | 1.81* | - | - | - |
| - | - | 60.48 | 985 | −0.009 |
|
| ||||
| MAT | 4.17*** | - | - | - |
| TS | 3.06** | - | - | - |
| MDR | −4.41*** | - | - | - |
| MTCQ | 2.16* | - | - | - |
| Sqrt(AP) | −1.03 | - | - | - |
| - | - | 39.84 | 1,015 | −0.003 |
***p < 0.001, **0.001 < p < 0.01, *0.01 < p < 0.05.
The proportion of samara species was log-transformed for the analysis. All the p-values of the Moran’s I tests for the SAR models were greater than 0.1. AP, mean annual precipitation (was square-root transformed in the analysis). MAT, mean annual temperature; TS, temperature seasonality; MTCQ, the temperature of the coldest quarter; MDR, mean diurnal range; ARI, relief degree of land surface; PDQ, precipitation of the driest quarter; pseudo-R.