Literature DB >> 35783901

Causes of erectile dysfunction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Haluk Tarik Kani1, Tarik Emre Sener2, Umut Emre Aykut1, Coskun Ozer Demirtas1, Caglayan Keklikkiran1, Ilkay Ergenc1, Abdullah Fatih Demirci3, Haydar Kamil Cam2, Cigdem Celikel4, Cem Akbal5, Deniz Duman1.   

Abstract

Background and Aim: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is an important and commonly seen disorder in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The objective of this study was to assess the rate of ED and its causes in a group of NAFLD patients. Materials and
Methods: The International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5) was used to evaluate the presence, causes, and severity of ED. Participants with an IIEF-5 score of <22 who agreed to undergo a urological evaluation were referred to a urologist for further assessment.
Results: A total of 136 NAFLD patients were enrolled in the study. According to the IIEF-5, 68 (50.0%) patients had ED. Multivariate analysis indicated that older age, obesity, and hypertension were associated with ED. Seventeen patients had multiple etiological factors for ED. Psychogenic ED was identified in 19 patients (39.6%), vasculogenic ED in 35 patients (72.9%), drug-related ED in 3 patients (6.3%), and neurogenic ED in 6 patients (12.5%).
Conclusion: ED is frequently seen in NAFLD patients, which may, at least in part, be due to common risk factors. Vasculogenic dysfunction is the most common single source of ED in NAFLD patients. Nonetheless, all potential etiologies should be carefully investigated, with special attention given to psychogenic factors, since they may be more frequent and relevant than expected. © Copyright 2021 by Hepatology Forum - Available online at www.hepatologyforum.org.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile dysfunction; International Index of Erectile Function; fatty liver; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 35783901      PMCID: PMC9138920          DOI: 10.14744/hf.2021.2021.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Forum        ISSN: 2757-7392


Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by fat deposition in hepatocytes (>5% of liver weight) without a history of significant alcohol consumption or concurrent chronic liver disease. NAFLD includes a wide spectrum of disorders, from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It is currently considered the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, especially in the Western world, with an approximate prevalence of 25%.[ NAFLD is considered a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, and is therefore associated with various disorders, such as renal dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and sexual dysfunction.[ Alteration of sexual function, in particular, erectile dysfunction (ED), which is defined as the inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, is thought to be quite common among those with advanced liver disease.[ ED is an important disorder with a reported prevalence of 18.4% in the adult population.[ The primary underlying etiologies of ED in the general population are vasculogenic, neurogenic, and psychogenic in origin, but multiple etiologies may also be present in a single patient.[ ED and NAFLD have several common risk factors, including endothelial dysfunction, obesity, and diabetes mellitus.[ Moreover, sperm parameters in NAFLD patients have been found to be impaired compared with healthy males.[ A few studies have noted that ED is an important and commonly observed co-disorder in NAFLD cases.[ However, knowledge of the ED etiology and its effects in patients with NAFLD remains limited. Evaluation of the underlying causes of ED is essential for appropriate management. This multidisciplinary study was designed to assess the frequency and the distribution of major underlying etiologies of ED in patients with NAFLD.

Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Marmara University Ethics Committee on December 2, 2016 (Study ID: 09.2016.593). The research was conducted in compliance with good clinical practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the patients provided written, informed consent to participate. Patients diagnosed with NAFLD between 2017 and 2018 at a single gastroenterology outpatient clinic were included in the study. Patients with cirrhosis were excluded. The diagnosis of NAFLD was established with evidence of hepatic steatosis observed using transabdominal ultrasonography in the absence of secondary causes of hepatic fat accumulation, such as significant alcohol consumption (≥30 g/day for men and ≥20 g/day for women), long-term use of steatogenic medication, monogenic hereditary disorders, viral or autoimmune hepatitis, hereditary hemochromatosis, or alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency.[ A detailed medical history was recorded and a physical examination was performed for all of the study patients. Clinical and laboratory data and anthropometric measurements were collected retrospectively from the hospital’s electronic database. Following a 12-hour fasting period, serum values of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, platelet, albumin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, plasma glucose concentration, and insulin level were measured as a part of routine follow-up tests for NAFLD patients and recorded. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula of the individual’s weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower costal border and the iliac crest at the end of normal expiration, and hip circumference was measured at the maximum circumference around the buttocks. ED was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5).[ All of the participants completed the IIEF-5 questionnaire under the supervision of a physician. The total score of the questionnaire ranges from 5 to 25, and scores >21 were classified as the absence of ED. Participants with a score of <22 and who agreed to undergo a urological evaluation were referred to see a urologist (TES). A urogenital physical examination was performed and a urological medical history was recorded. The etiology of ED was evaluated and the pathophysiology was classified as vasculogenic, neurogenic, anatomical/structural, drug-induced, or mixed ED.[ Normally distributed data were expressed as the mean±SD, and non-normally distributed data were presented as the median value. Variables were compared using an independent t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test according to the normality of distribution. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the factors that contributed to ED. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 136 patients with NAFLD were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 45.64±1.55 years. The gender orientation of all of the study participants was heterosexual. According to the IIEF-5, 68 (50.0%) patients had ED. In the group, 120 (88.2%) patients were married, 14 (10.3%) patients had a BMI between 18.5 kg/m2 and 24.9 kg/m2, 36 (26.5%) had a diagnosis of hypertension, 97 (71.3%) were smokers, and 72 (52.9%) had a fasting glucose level of ≥100 mg/dL or a prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Table 1).
Table 1.

General characteristics of patients with and without erectile dysfunction according to International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire scores

  All patients (n=136) With ED (n=68) Without ED (n=68)
Age (years) (mean±SD)45.64±11.5548.65±11.8342.63±10.52
Marital status (n, %)   
 Married120 (88.2)60 (88.2)60 (88.2)
 Divorced4 (2.9)3 (4.4)1 (1.5)
 Single12 (8.8)5 (7.4)7 (10.3)
Height (cm) (mean±SD)172.49±6.85171.17±6.59173.80±6.90
Weight (kg) (mean±SD)89.12±15.7090.62±18.2787.62±12.58
Body mass index (kg/m2) (mean±SD)30.00±5.2730.98±6.4329.02±3.55
Waist circumference (cm) (mean±SD)106.02±13.40107.38±13.06104.66±13.69
Hip circumference (cm) (mean±SD)106.27±9.37106.97±9.30115.57±9.46
Fasting glucose >100 mg/dL (n, %)72 (52.9)34 (50.0)38 (55.9)
Smoker (n, %)97 (71.3)46 (67.6)51 (75.0)
Hypertension (n, %)36 (26.5)26 (38.2)10 (14.7)
AST (IU/L) (median, range)29 (9–286)31 (9–117)28 (12–286)
ALT (IU/L) (median, range)44.5 (13–297)44 (14–231)45.5 (13–297)
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) (mean±SD)200.29±47.61197.91±44.44202.51±50.66
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) (mean±SD)43.40±9.3643.22±9.8643.56±8.95
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) (mean±SD)122.04±39.24118.13±39.91125.90±38.52
Triglycerides (mg/dL) (median, range)154 (38–685)157.5 (58–685)144 (38–580)
Metabolic syndrome (n, %)52 (38.2)30 (44.1)22 (32.4)

ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ED: Erectile dysfunction; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein; SD: Standard deviation.

General characteristics of patients with and without erectile dysfunction according to International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire scores ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ED: Erectile dysfunction; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein; SD: Standard deviation. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age, obesity, and hypertension were associated with ED in NAFLD patients (p=0.003, 0.026, and 0.003, respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2.

Estimated coefficients determined using multivariable logistic regression with descriptors and clinical demographic data

  Coefficient OR (95% CI) p
Age-0.0480.9530.003*
Obesity0.7792.1790.026*
Hypertension1.2783.5900.003*

CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; *: p<0.05 was accepted as significant.

Estimated coefficients determined using multivariable logistic regression with descriptors and clinical demographic data CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; *: p<0.05 was accepted as significant. Forty-eight patients agreed to a urological examination, and ED was not confirmed in 5 (10.4%) of those patients. Seventeen patients had multiple etiologies for ED. Psychogenic ED was identified in 19 patients (39.6%), vasculogenic ED in 35 (72.9%) patients, drug-related ED in 3 (6.3%) patients, and neurogenic ED in 6 (12.5%) patients (Table 3). Twenty-nine (60.4%) patients reported premature ejaculation and 4 (2.9%) patients described a loss of sexual desire. Medical treatment for ED was prescribed for 36 (75.0%) patients.
Table 3.

Distribution of mixed ED etiologies in NAFLD patients

  Vasculogenic ED Psychogenic ED Neurogenic ED Drug-related ED
Vasculogenic ED (n=35) 853
Psychogenic ED (n=16)8 10
Neurogenic ED (n=6)51 0
Drug-related ED (n=3)300 

ED: Erectile dysfunction; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Distribution of mixed ED etiologies in NAFLD patients ED: Erectile dysfunction; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Discussion

The findings of the present study are a valuable contribution to the currently limited literature regarding the relationship between NAFLD and ED. The IIEF-5 questionnaire results indicated that there was an ED frequency of 50% among consecutive patients with NAFLD seen at a single tertiary center. As in the general population, older age, obesity, and hypertension were found to be associated with ED in our NAFLD cohort. Vasculogenic disorder was the most common etiology of ED in the group, which is similar to results for the general population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the underlying etiologies of ED in patients with NAFLD. In an earlier study conducted by our team, the frequency of ED was 67.5% in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD.[ In the current research, ultrasound was used to screen for NAFLD and returned a lower rate of ED. This was likely due to the severity or stage of disease; in the previous cohort, there was a prominent nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) dominance, which is a more advanced stage of hepatic steatosis with inflammation. The lack of liver biopsy results precluded the calculation of the prevalence of NASH rates in the present study, which may be relevant to the interpretation of the findings. The rate of ED was 45.8% in a hospital-based study of 192 consecutive male patients that used radiological methods, rather than liver biopsy, to diagnose NAFLD.[ That is to say, the modality used to detect NAFLD may have contributed to the differences between studies. The frequency of ED can be projected to be somewhere between 45% and 67% among patients with NAFLD. The reported ED rates in NAFLD patients are far higher than that of the general population, which has been reported to be 18.4% among males over 20 years of age in the United States.[ This may be related to common metabolic risk factors for NAFLD and ED, such as obesity and diabetes mellitus.[ Given the significant proportion of patients with NAFLD suffering from ED, efforts to understand the causes and to find novel therapeutic approaches could have a substantial impact on the quality of life of this patient group. Hasanain et al.[ found that older age, obesity, and hypertension were significantly more frequent in patients with NAFLD and ED, but multivariate analysis yielded only age as a variable associated with ED. We found that obesity and hypertension were also associated with ED in patients with NAFLD, in addition to age. These factors are associated both with NAFLD and ED; the combination and potential interaction merits clarification in future studies. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the underlying etiologies of ED in NAFLD patients. We found that 39.5% of the NAFLD patients had multiple etiologies of ED. The most common etiology in our study group was a vasculogenic disorder, which was also probably linked to obesity, diabetes, or atherosclerosis. Notably, psychogenic ED was found in 39.6% of the NAFLD cases; thus, psychological disorders must also be evaluated carefully in NAFLD patients with concomitant ED. Limitations of this research include the fact that it was a single-center study conducted with a small number of patients. Also, since this was a cross-sectional study, only the causes of ED in consecutive NAFLD patients who were diagnosed with ED were analyzed; the response to ED treatment was not evaluated. Future studies to examine the long-term results of ED treatment in NAFLD patients and the potential influence on the progress of NAFLD are warranted. In addition, a detailed endocrinological evaluation would add value to the findings of the present study. In conclusion, ED is common in patients with NAFLD, and may be related to common risk factors. Vasculogenic ED is the most common single cause of ED in patients with NAFLD; however, all possible etiologies should be carefully assessed, and special attention should be given to psychogenic ED, since it has been detected in a non-negligible percentage of patients with NAFLD.
  19 in total

1.  A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference.

Authors:  Vlad Ratziu; Stefano Bellentani; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Chris Day; Giulio Marchesini
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Hunter Wessells; Jennifer Pace; Matt Schonlau; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-23

Review 3.  Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men.

Authors:  Francesco Montorsi; Ganesan Adaikan; Edgardo Becher; Francois Giuliano; Saad Khoury; Tom F Lue; Ira Sharlip; Stanley E Althof; Karl-Eric Andersson; Gerald Brock; Gregory Broderick; Arthur Burnett; Jacques Buvat; John Dean; Craig Donatucci; Ian Eardley; Kerstin S Fugl-Meyer; Irwin Goldstein; Geoff Hackett; Dimitris Hatzichristou; Wayne Hellstrom; Luca Incrocci; Graham Jackson; Ates Kadioglu; Laurence Levine; Ronald W Lewis; Mario Maggi; Marita McCabe; Chris G McMahon; Drogo Montague; Piero Montorsi; John Mulhall; Jim Pfaus; Hartmut Porst; David Ralph; Raymond Rosen; David Rowland; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad; Ridwan Shabsigh; Christian Stief; Yoram Vardi; Kim Wallen; Marlene Wasserman
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Male sexual disturbances in liver diseases: what do we know?

Authors:  M Durazzo; A Premoli; C Di Bisceglie; S Bo; E Ghigo; C Manieri
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Male Sexual Dysfunction, and Infertility: Common Links, Common Problems.

Authors:  Dorota J Hawksworth; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2019-03-19

7.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease is Associated with Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Deniz Güney Duman; Ercan Biçakci; Çiğdem Ataizi Çelikel; Cem Akbal
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Zobair Younossi; Quentin M Anstee; Milena Marietti; Timothy Hardy; Linda Henry; Mohammed Eslam; Jacob George; Elisabetta Bugianesi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alteration in semen quality and reproductive hormones.

Authors:  Yan Li; Lei Liu; Bin Wang; Dongfeng Chen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Higher liver stiffness scores are associated with early kidney dysfunction in patients with histologically proven non-cirrhotic NAFLD.

Authors:  D-Q Sun; F-Z Ye; H T Kani; J-R Yang; K I Zheng; H-Y Zhang; G Targher; C D Byrne; Y-P Chen; W-J Yuan; Y Yilmaz; M-H Zheng
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.