| Literature DB >> 35783701 |
Abstract
The author intends to investigate the role of social distancing laws in the new normal as well as the effectiveness of forced shift to media online learning. This research indicates that student involvement had a moderating influence during the epidemic. This study is based on social learning theory (SLT), which endeavors to emulate the behavior, perceptions, and emotions of other individuals. The data were obtained from various Chinese universities. We gathered data utilizing the stratified sample approach as well as Google Form. A total of 256 students enrolled in a variety of programs at Chinese universities completed a questionnaire for this investigation. The direct, mediating, and moderating effects of the variables were evaluated using partial least square structural equation modeling in this study (PLS-SEM), using the Smart-PLS software 3.0. According to the findings, forced shift to media online learning acts as a mediator between the lack of social interaction, perceived harm, perception of maintaining social distancing, and the law, and the effectiveness of media online learning has a significant effect on the effectiveness of media online learning. In addition, student engagement appears to be a moderator between the forced shift to media online learning and its effectiveness. A future study might concentrate on gaining a deeper understanding of the numerous online engagement-promoting behaviors. Teachers must go above and above to provide themes that enable pupils to connect while learning. Instructors and educational institutions will benefit from the research since it will allow them to define methods for boosting social interaction in online learning and analyze methods for enhancing the efficacy of media in online learning.Entities:
Keywords: effectiveness of media online learning; force-shift to media online learning; lack of social interaction; perceived harm; perception of maintaining social distancing and law
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783701 PMCID: PMC9247616 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Conceptual framework.
Demographic analysis.
| Demography | Description | Responses | % |
| Gender | Male | 161 | 65.4 |
| Female | 88 | 34.6 | |
| Qualification | Bachelors | 85 | 33.2 |
| Masters | 95 | 37.1 | |
| Ph.D. or others | 76 | 29.7 | |
| Residence | Rural | 90 | 35.2 |
| Urban | 161 | 64.8 |
N = 256.
FIGURE 2Output of measurement model algorithm.
Factor loadings, reliabilities, and AVE.
| Construct | Item | Loadings | CA | CR | AVE |
| Perception of | SD1 | 0.746 | 0.707 | 0.836 | 0.630 |
| maintaining social | SD2 | 0.854 | |||
| distancing and law | SD3 | 0.777 | |||
| Lack of | SI1 | 0.751 | 0.826 | 0.878 | 0.591 |
| social | SI2 | 0.723 | |||
| interaction | SI3 | 0.829 | |||
| SI4 | 0.821 | ||||
| SI5 | 0.712 | ||||
| Perceived | PH2 | 0.769 | 0.777 | 0.857 | 0.600 |
| harm | PH3 | 0.728 | |||
| PH4 | 0.789 | ||||
| PH5 | 0.808 | ||||
| Force-shift to | FSOL3 | 0.883 | 0.703 | 0.828 | 0.618 |
| media online | FSOL4 | 0.746 | |||
| learning | FSOL5 | 0.720 | |||
| Student | SE2 | 0.682 | 0.843 | 0.884 | 0.560 |
| engagement | SE4 | 0.718 | |||
| SE5 | 0.726 | ||||
| SE6 | 0.802 | ||||
| SE7 | 0.792 | ||||
| SE8 | 0.699 | ||||
| Effectiveness of | EOL1 | 0.785 | 0.868 | 0.904 | 0.653 |
| media | EOL2 | 0.813 | |||
| online | EOL3 | 0.866 | |||
| learning | EOL4 | 0.749 | |||
| EOL5 | 0.824 | ||||
Fornell and Larcker criterion.
| EMOL | FSMOL | SI | SD | PH | SE | |
|
|
| |||||
|
| 0.780 |
| ||||
|
| 0.592 | 0.459 |
| |||
|
| 0.504 | 0.475 | 0.397 |
| ||
|
| 0.235 | 0.281 | 0.354 | 0.202 |
| |
|
| 0.565 | 0.482 | 0.331 | 0.362 | 0.195 |
|
EMOL, effectiveness of media online learning; FSMOL, forced shift to media online learning; SE, student engagement; SI, lack of social interaction; PH, perceived harm; SDAL, perception of maintaining social distancing and law.
Bold values show the relationship and significance.
FIGURE 3Output of structural model bootstrapping.
Direct effects of the variables.
| Standard deviation | Decision | ||||
| FSMOL – >EMOL | 0.545 | 0.042 | 12.894 | 0.000 | Accept |
| SI – >EMOL | 0.286 | 0.046 | 5.841 | 0.000 | Accept |
| SI – >FSMOL | 0.286 | 0.062 | 4.609 | 0.000 | Accept |
| PH – >EMOL | −0.067 | 0.039 | 1.752 | 0.000 | Accept |
| PH – >FSMOL | 0.118 | 0.057 | 1.967 | 0.025 | Accept |
| SDAL – >EMOL | 0.079 | 0.037 | 2.229 | 0.013 | Accept |
| SDAL – >FSMOL | 0.339 | 0.060 | 5.655 | 0.000 | Accept |
| SE – >EMOL | 0.198 | 0.042 | 4.717 | 0.000 | Accept |
EMOL, effectiveness of media online learning; FSMOL, forced shift to media online learning; SE, student engagement; SI, lack of social interaction; PH, perceived harm; SDAL, perception of maintaining social distancing and law.
Mediator hypothesis testing.
| (STDEV) | ||||
| FSMOL | −0.074 | 0.030 | 2.384 | 0.009 |
EMOL, effectiveness of media online learning; FSMOL, forced shift to media online learning; SE, student engagement.
* shows relationship impact of two factors has been checked on another variable.
Moderator hypothesis testing.
| Standard deviation | Decision | ||||
| PH- > FSMOL- > EMOL | 0.600 | 0.031 | 1.940 | 0.26 | Accept |
| SDAL- > FSMOL- > EMOL | 0.183 | 0.035 | 5.156 | 0.000 | Accept |
| SI- > FSMOL- > EMOL | 0.154 | 0.035 | 4.450 | 0.000 | Accept |
EMOL, effectiveness of media online learning; FSMOL, forced shift to media online learning; SI, lack of social interaction; PH, perceived harm; SDAL, perception of maintaining social distancing and law.
Assessment of R2.
| R square | R square adjusted | |
| EMOL | 0.719 | 0.713 |
| FSMOL | 0.324 | 0.315 |
EMOL, effectiveness of media online learning; FSMOL, forced shift to media online learning.