| Literature DB >> 35783326 |
Qi-Liang Zhang1,2,3,4, Wen-Hao Lin1,2,3,4, Shi-Hao Lin1,2,3,4, Hua Cao1,2,3,4, Qiang Chen1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of remote nutrition management on promoting the growth and development of neonates after congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: congenital heart disease; growth and development; neonates; nutrition; remote nutrition management
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783326 PMCID: PMC9243536 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.918742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
FIGURE 1The flow chartof remote management nutrition via Wechat.
Demographic data of patients and their parents in two groups at discharge.
| Intervention group | Control group |
| |
| Number | 32 | 30 | |
| Age (Day) | 19.4 ± 6.3 | 20.2 ± 6.6 | 0.346 |
| Weight (kg) | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 0.456 |
| Height (cm) | 47.1 ± 1.5 | 46.9 ± 1.7 | 0.405 |
| WAZ | −2.1 ± 0.4 | −2.0 ± 0.5 | 0.539 |
| Disease | |||
| Ventricular septal defect | 7 | 6 | 0.995 |
| Patent ductus arteriosus | 8 | 9 | |
| Pulmonary stenosis | 2 | 2 | |
| Aorta arch constriction | 3 | 2 | |
| Ventricular septal defect with patent ductus arteriosus | 6 | 7 | |
| Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection | 2 | 2 | |
| Complete transposition of great arteries | 2 | 1 | |
| Aortic arch interrupt | 2 | 1 | |
| Feeding patterns | |||
| Nasogastric | 7 | 6 | 0.925 |
| Bottle-feeding | 21 | 21 | |
| Direct breastfeeding | 4 | 3 | |
| Age of parents (year) | 39.6 ± 3.8 | 30.5 ± 5.2 | 0.306 |
| Family income | |||
| Low income | 9 | 10 | 0.897 |
| Middle-income | 18 | 16 | |
| High income | 5 | 4 | |
| Parents’ education level | |||
| Under high school | 6 | 5 | 0.905 |
| High school | 8 | 7 | |
| Junior college | 12 | 10 | |
| Bachelor degree or higher | 6 | 8 | |
| Living condition | |||
| Rural area | 20 | 19 | 0.946 |
| City | 12 | 11 | |
The age of premature infants was calculated after corrected gestational age.
Comparison of feeding, growth and development between the two groups 3 months after discharge.
| Intervention group | Control group |
| |
| Weight (kg) | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 0.016 |
| Height (cm) | 57.7 ± 3.7 | 55.4 ± 2.9 | 0.010 |
| WAZ | −0.7 ± 0.5 | −1.3 ± 0.8 | 0.006 |
| Adding high-energy milk or breast milk fortifier | 15 | 6 | 0.025 |
| Amount of milk | 142.2 ± 14.7 | 115.0 ± 13.2 | 0.000 |
| FCTI score of parents | 20.9 ± 5.9 | 24.5 ± 4.6 | 0.011 |
Comparison of complications between the two groups during 3 months follow-up time.
| Intervention group | Control group |
| |
| Respiratory tract infection | 3 | 9 | 0.040 |
| Feeding intolerance | 7 | 4 | 0.379 |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis | 0 | 0 | – |
| Readmission | 1 | 6 | 0.036 |
| Liver insufficiency | 2 | 1 | 0.593 |
| Renal insufficiency | 0 | 0 | – |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | 0 | 0 | – |
| Cardiac insufficiency | 0 | 1 | – |
| Arrhythmology | 3 | 2 | 0.696 |