Literature DB >> 35783178

Porphyrin-Based Multicomponent Metallacage: Host-Guest Complexation toward Photooxidation-Triggered Reversible Encapsulation and Release.

Zeyuan Zhang1, Lingzhi Ma1, Fang Fang2, Yali Hou1, Chenjie Lu3, Chaoqun Mu1, Yafei Zhang1, Haifei Liu1, Ke Gao1, Ming Wang4, Zixi Zhang5, Xiaopeng Li6, Mingming Zhang1.   

Abstract

The development of supramolecular hosts with effective host-guest properties is crucial for their applications. Herein, we report the preparation of a porphyrin-based metallacage, which serves as a host for a series of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The association constant between the metallacage and coronene reaches 2.37 × 107 M-1 in acetonitrile/chloroform (ν/ν = 9/1), which is among the highest values in metallacage-based host-guest complexes. Moreover, the metallacage exhibits good singlet oxygen generation capacity, which can be further used to oxidize encapsulated anthracene derivatives into anthracene endoperoxides, leading to the release of guests. By employing 10-phenyl-9-(2-phenylethynyl)anthracene whose endoperoxide can be converted back by heating as the guest, a reversible controlled release system is constructed. This study not only gives a type of porphyrin-based metallacage that shows desired host-guest interactions with PAHs but also offers a photooxidation-responsive host-guest recognition motif, which will guide future design and applications of metallacages for stimuli-responsive materials.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35783178      PMCID: PMC9241011          DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACS Au        ISSN: 2691-3704


Introduction

The design and preparation of supramolecular hosts, which can effectively encapsulate guest molecules remain a central theme of supramolecular chemistry.[1,2] Such host–guest systems possess good selectivity, high efficiency, and stimuli responsiveness, enabling their wide applications in the construction of advanced supramolecular materials.[3,4] So far, numerous host systems have been developed including, but not limited to, crown ethers,[5−7] cyclodextrins,[8,9] calixarenes,[10,11] cucurbiturils,[12,13] cyclophanes,[14,15] and pillararenes[16,17] for a wide array of applications in sensing,[18,19] separation and purification,[20,21] transportation,[22,23] drug delivery and release,[24,25] etc. These covalent hosts possess enhanced stabilities, which enable them to be ideal building blocks for the preparation of robust materials. Their functionalization, however, is generally tedious and time-consuming and sometimes quite challenging, especially for water-soluble hosts such as cucurbiturils.[26,27] Directional self-assembly is emerging as an alternative approach for providing noncovalently linked supramolecular hosts with tunable and adjustable cavities.[28,29] Moreover, further functionalities can be readily introduced into the noncovalent hosts via the selection and modification of building blocks toward advanced applications.[30,31] Owing to their moderate bond strength and well-defined directionality, metal-coordination interactions have proved to be ideal noncovalent interactions for assembling metallacycles[32−36] and metallacages,[37−44] which are further employed as supramolecular hosts with predictable shapes and sizes. Compared with two-dimensional metallacycles, metallacages possess three-dimensional structures and cavities, making them encapsulate guest molecules from multiple directions and thus offering host–guest complexes with high binding affinities.[45,46] Therefore, during the past three decades, various metallacages have been extensively investigated and applied for guest encapsulation,[47−49] catalysis,[50−53] stabilizing reactive intermediates,[54,55] etc. Among them, porphyrin-based metallacages[56,57] have received much attention because they integrate the interesting optical and redox abilities of porphyrins and the host–guest properties of metallacages, offering extra functionalization such as light-harvesting and biological catalysis.[58−62] As an important branch of porphyrin-based metallacages, multicomponents have also been widely explored.[63−65] However, although these papers proposed that they had the metallacages, no crystal structures were provided. In a very recent study,[66] different from previously reported three-dimensional (3D) prisms (Figure , route A), the self-assembly from tetrapyridyl porphyrin (1), Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 (2), and dicarboxylate ligands (3′) was found to afford two-dimensional (2D) Bow Ties (Figure , route B) instead of 3D prisms, based on the X-ray crystal structures and detailed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis. This finding casted a shadow on the future study of porphyrin-based multicomponent metallacages. Therefore, the exploration of multicomponent self-assembly to generate metallacages rather than metallacycles is urgently needed.
Figure 1

Different strategies for the self-assembly from tetrapyridyl porphyrin 1, cis-Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)22, and multicarboxylate ligands 3 or 3′.

Different strategies for the self-assembly from tetrapyridyl porphyrin 1, cis-Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)22, and multicarboxylate ligands 3 or 3′. Herein, we use tetracarboxylate ligands (3) instead of dicarboxylate ligands (3′) as the carboxylic building blocks and prepare a porphyrin-based metallacage (4) via multicomponent self-assembly (Figure , route C). This strategy excludes the formation of 2D metallacycle structures and offers improved stability for the metallacage via multiple cooperative N–Pt–O coordination bonds. Moreover, the metallacage possesses a box-shaped structure with openings at both ends, which can allow easy access for planar organic molecules. The two π-conjugated, electron-rich porphyrin faces are aligned parallel to encapsulate planar molecules through π–π stacking. Therefore, the host–guest chemistry of the porphyrin-based metallacage was further systematically studied using polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as the guests.[67−71] It is worth mentioning that the crystal structures of all of the host–guest complexes are well resolved. More interestingly, the metallacage can generate singlet oxygen (1O2) effectively upon photoirradiation, which will weaken the host–guest interactions and trigger the release of anthracene-derived guests via photooxidation. By further heating the system, the released endoperoxide guest, viz., 10-phenyl-9-(2-phenylethynyl)anthracene, can be converted back and reencapsulated. Such a host–guest system with photoresponsive encapsulation and release capability is constructed and may find further applications as stimuli-responsive materials.

Results and Discussion

Preparation and Characterization Studies of Metallacages

Based on the self-assembly of tetrapyridyl porphyrin (1), tetracarboxylic ligand (2), and cis-Pt(PEt3)2(OTf)2 (3), metallacage 4 was successfully prepared. The structure of the metallacage was fully characterized by multinuclear NMR (31P{1H} and 1H), electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), and X-ray diffraction analysis. The 31P{1H} NMR spectra of 4 split into two doublet peaks at 7.14 and 1.11 ppm (Figure a), which hold equal intensities with concomitant 195Pt satellites due to different phosphorus environments after the coordination of platinum atoms with pyridyl and carboxylic groups. In the 1H NMR spectra (Figure b), diagnostic chemical shift changes were observed for the porphyrinic protons H1, H2, and H3 and all of them split into two sets of signals after coordination, corresponding to the protons inside and outside of the metallacage. ESI-TOF-MS provided further evidence of the formation of the metallacage (Figure c). Peaks at m/z 939.8862, 1157.6560, 1484.3114, and 2028.7831 were found with isotopically well-resolved patterns, corresponding to [4 – 6OTf]6+, [4 – 5OTf]5+, [4 – 4OTf]4+, and [4 – 3OTf]3+.
Figure 2

(a) Cartoon representations of metallacage 4 by multicomponent self-assembly; partial (b) 31P {1H} and (c) 1H NMR spectra (243 or 600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of metallacage 4; (d) ESI-TOF-MS spectra of metallacage 4. (d–f) Crystal structure of metallacage 4. Hydrogen atoms, triethylphosphine units, counterions, and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity.[72]

(a) Cartoon representations of metallacage 4 by multicomponent self-assembly; partial (b) 31P {1H} and (c) 1H NMR spectra (243 or 600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of metallacage 4; (d) ESI-TOF-MS spectra of metallacage 4. (d–f) Crystal structure of metallacage 4. Hydrogen atoms, triethylphosphine units, counterions, and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity.[72] Single crystals of 4 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by vapor diffusion of i-propyl ether into acetonitrile for 3 weeks. The crystal structure (Figures d–f, S5, and S6) provides direct evidence for the formation of the metallacage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the crystal structure of porphyrin-based multicomponent Pt(II)-metallacage is resolved.[63−65] The two porphyrinic and biphenyl units are connected by eight Pt atoms and the angles of N–Pt–O are 82.3–83.5°, forming a box-like metallacage with a dimension of 14.9 × 12.0 × 8.3 Å3, based on the distance between the Pt atoms. The two porphyrin panels in the metallacage are parallel with each other and the distance between the two panels is 8.1 Å, which is an ideal distance to enable π–π stacking interactions with encapsulated aromatic guests. Moreover, this type of connection offers two large windows, which assist the guest molecules to enter into the cavity to form stable host–guest complexes. The metallacages are aligned along with the windows to form nanochannels (Figure f), which may facilitate host–guest complexation in the solid state. UV/vis and fluorescence spectra (Figure S7) of ligand 1 and metallacage 4 were further collected to study their photophysical properties. Ligand 1 and metallacage 4 showed a strong Soret peak centered at ca. 417 nm and four Q bands centered at ca. 650, 590, 550, and 515 nm, respectively, which are the typical absorption of porphyrin derivatives.[73] Two emission peaks at 655 and 717 nm were observed for 1 and 4. Since porphyrin derivatives can generate singlet oxygen effectively upon photoirradiation,[74] the 1O2 generation capabilities of 1 and 4 were studied by collecting the phosphorescence emission spectra of 1O2. An intense peak at 1270 nm (Figure S8) was observed for both 1 and 4 upon irradiation (λex = 405 nm), consisting of the photodegradation of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran using two photosensitizers (Figures S9 and S10), suggesting the strong 1O2 generation ability of both the ligand and the metallacage.

Host–Guest Properties of Metallacage 4

Considering that metallacage 4 possesses a box-shaped cavity and two electron-rich porphyrin faces, its complexation with PAHs including anthracene (G), phenanthrene (G), pyrene (G), triphenylene (G), perylene (G), and coronene (G) was further studied. Taking coronene as an example, when it was added to the acetonitrile solution of 4, a color change from claret-red to brown was observed, suggesting the charge-transfer interactions between 4 and G. Job’s plots based on UV/vis spectroscopic absorbance data (λ = 417 nm) were carried out, indicating that the complexes of 4 with PAHs in acetonitrile were all of 1:1 stoichiometries (Figures S11–S16). This was also confirmed by ESI-TOF-MS (Figures a,b and S17). For example, peaks were observed at m/z 989.9975, 1217.7954, and 1559.4902 (Figure b), corresponding to [4⊃G – 6OTf]6+, [4⊃G – 5OTf]5+, and [4⊃G – 4OTf]4+. The complexation between metallacage 4 and PAHs was further studied by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figures c–g and S18–S23). All complexation systems exhibit fast exchange on the proton NMR timescale because the large windows of the metallacage make it easy for the guests to get in and out. Significant upfield shifts were observed for all of the resonances of the bound guests, indicating good host–guest interactions. For example, protons Hα, Hβ, and Hγ of G and proton Hδ of G shifted from 8.30, 7.76, 7.53, and 9.03 ppm to 4.16, 3.76, 4.81, and 6.32 ppm, respectively. Correspondingly, all of the resonances of metallacage 4 undergo significant changes with downfield or upfield shifts. These results indicated that the cavity of 4 provided a shielded magnetic environment for the guests.
Figure 3

ESI-TOF-MS spectra of (a) 4⊃G and (b) 4⊃G; partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K) of (c) G, (d) 4⊃G, (e) 4, (f) 4⊃G, and (g) G. [Host] = [Guest] = 1.00 mM. Fluorescence spectra of metallacage 4 at a fixed concentration upon the addition of (h) G and (j) G in CH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1); nonlinear fitting curves of the emission intensity at 655 and 715 nm of metallacage 4 versus the concentrations of (i) G and (k) G; and (l) plots of the logarithms of the association constants versus the number of π electrons on PAHs in CH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1).

ESI-TOF-MS spectra of (a) 4⊃G and (b) 4⊃G; partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K) of (c) G, (d) 4⊃G, (e) 4, (f) 4⊃G, and (g) G. [Host] = [Guest] = 1.00 mM. Fluorescence spectra of metallacage 4 at a fixed concentration upon the addition of (h) G and (j) G in CH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1); nonlinear fitting curves of the emission intensity at 655 and 715 nm of metallacage 4 versus the concentrations of (i) G and (k) G; and (l) plots of the logarithms of the association constants versus the number of π electrons on PAHs in CH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1). Concentration-dependent fluorescence titration experiments were carried out to measure the association constants (Ka) between metallacage 4 and PAHs in solution. For a better comparison, CH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1) was used as the solvent owing to the poor solubility of large PAHs such as perylene and coronene in acetonitrile. The fluorescence intensity of metallacage 4 decreased gradually upon the addition of the guests. The Ka of 4⊃G, 4⊃G, 4⊃G, 4⊃G, 4⊃G, and 4⊃G were determined as (1.19 ± 0.06) × 103, (1.55 ± 0.04) × 103, (1.94 ± 0.09) × 104, (9.33 ± 0.74) × 104, (2.77 ± 0.63) × 105, and (2.37 ± 0.99) × 107 M–1, respectively (Figures h–l and S28–S33). It is worth noting that these values are among the highest binding constants for metallacage-based host–guest complexes.[46,75] This is because the two porphyrin faces in the metallacage are well organized in an ideal distance to promote the π–π stacking interactions with encapsulated PAHs. Interestingly, the values of log Ka are linearly proportional to the number of π-electrons on PAHs (Figure l and Table ) with a correlation coefficient of 0.98. This could be used to predict the association constants between metallacage and PAHs.
Table 1

Association Constants between Metallacage 4 and Different PAHs

  association constant (Ka, M–1)
guest moleculesnumber of π electronsCH3CNCH3CN/CHCl3 (ν/ν = 9/1)
G114(4.72 ± 0.11) × 103(1.19 ± 0.6) × 103
G214(9.05 ± 0.27) × 103(1.55 ± 0.04) × 103
G316(9.37 ± 1.67) × 104(1.94 ± 0.09) × 104
G418(6.66 ± 3.53) × 105(9.33 ± 0.74) × 104
G520 (2.77 ± 0.63) × 105
G624 (2.37 ± 0.99) × 107
The single crystals of metallacage 4 with a series of PAHs suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were also obtained by vapor diffusion of i-propyl ether into acetonitrile for 3 weeks and provided unambiguous evidence for the formation of inclusion complexes. Ranging from three to seven fused benzenoid rings, the crystalline complexes (Figure ) formed between metallacage 4 and various PAHs with a 1:1 stoichiometry were isolated. It is worth mentioning that the distance between the two porphyrin faces decreased from ca. 8.1 to 7.0 Å after complexation. Correspondingly, the distances between the PAHs and porphyrin faces are 3.4–3.6 Å, which meets the requirements for π–π stacking interactions. It can be seen from the top views of crystal structures (Figure ) that the PAHs align themselves in register with the maximum number of binding sites in metallacage 4 by translational positioning or rotational location. In the crystal structures, anthracene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and triphenylene are disordered, leading to the broad signals of the protons on these guests in the 1H NMR spectra (Figures S18–S21) after complexation. However, for perylene and coronene, extra [C–H···π] interactions were also found between their peripheral protons and the phenyl rings of the carboxylic ligands to stabilize the whole complexes in addition to the π–π stacking interactions (Figure m,n). Therefore, the movements of perylene or coronene inside the cavity are restricted, giving sharp signals of the guests in the 1H NMR spectra (Figures c–g, S22, and S23).
Figure 4

Crystal structures of (a, b) 4⊃G, (c, d) 4⊃G, (e, f) 4⊃G, (g, h) 4⊃G, (i, j, m) 4⊃G, and (k, l, n) 4⊃G. Hydrogen atoms, triethylphosphine units, counterions, and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity.[72]

Crystal structures of (a, b) 4⊃G, (c, d) 4⊃G, (e, f) 4⊃G, (g, h) 4⊃G, (i, j, m) 4⊃G, and (k, l, n) 4⊃G. Hydrogen atoms, triethylphosphine units, counterions, and solvent molecules were omitted for clarity.[72]

Photooxidation-Triggered Encapsulation and Release

The stimuli responsiveness of such host–guest complexation was further explored. As the metallacage can generate 1O2 effectively, the oxidation of anthracene inside the metallacage was conducted (Figure a–d). The encapsulated anthracene fully converted into epidioxyanthracene upon photoirradiation (λex = 405 nm) for 10 min, as revealed from the fact that all of the peaks of the protons for anthracene disappeared and the peaks of the protons for epidioxyanthracene emerged (Figure b,c). It is worth mentioning that the chemical shifts of the epidioxyanthracene protons located at the same position with free epidioxyanthracene (Figure c,d), suggesting that epidioxyanthracene was released from the cavity of the metallacage after oxidation. This was also evidenced by the DOSY experiments (Figures S34 and S35) that epidioxyanthracene showed a different diffusion coefficient (D = 2.31 × 10–9 m2 s–1) from that of metallacage 4 (D = 6.21 × 10–10 m2 s–1), while the complex 4⊃anthracene only exhibits one single diffusion coefficient (D = 6.55 × 10–10 m2 s–1). However, epidioxyanthracene would decompose upon heating,[76] so the reencapsulation process cannot take place using anthracene as the guest.
Figure 5

Partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of (a) G, (b) 4⊃G, and (c) 4⊃G upon photoirradiation for 10 min and (d) epidioxyanthracene G–O. (e) Chemical structures of anthracene derivatives tested in the reversible controlled release study. Partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of (f) 4, (g) 4⊃G, and (h) 4⊃G upon photoirradiation for 20 min, (i) and heating at 80°C for 30 min. (j, k) Fatigue cycles for the reversible host–guest system characterized by fluorescence spectroscopy. [Host] = [Guest] = 10.00 M, λex = 405 nm.

Partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of (a) G, (b) 4⊃G, and (c) 4⊃G upon photoirradiation for 10 min and (d) epidioxyanthracene G–O. (e) Chemical structures of anthracene derivatives tested in the reversible controlled release study. Partial 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of (f) 4, (g) 4⊃G, and (h) 4⊃G upon photoirradiation for 20 min, (i) and heating at 80°C for 30 min. (j, k) Fatigue cycles for the reversible host–guest system characterized by fluorescence spectroscopy. [Host] = [Guest] = 10.00 M, λex = 405 nm. To construct a reversible photooxidation-triggered host–guest complexation, we screened several anthracene derivatives (Figure e) to find a suitable guest for the metallacage. Compounds G, G, and G showed good host–guest interactions with metallacage 4 (Figures S41–S44). Compounds G and G could be converted into their epidioxyanthracene analogues upon irradiation at 405 nm. However, their endoperoxides would undergo fast deoxidation to their original structures at room temperature. The encapsulated G failed to be converted into its endoperoxide upon irradiation, owing to its high stability. Due to steric hindrance of the benzene rings on both sides, G showed a poor host–guest interaction with metallacage 4 (Figure S45). Therefore, 10-phenyl-9-(2-phenylethynyl)anthracene (G) was chosen as the guest for the construction of this reversible host–guest complex because its endoperoxide G–O showed moderate stability at room temperature and could be converted back to G upon heating quickly (Figures S46 and S51).[77] Compound G also formed stable 1:1 host–guest complexes (Figure S46) with metallacage 4. This was confirmed by ESI-TOF-MS as well (Figure S46c). Peaks were observed at m/z 998.3403, 1227.8087, 1572.0200, and 2145.6626, corresponding to [4⊃G – 6OTf]6+, [4⊃G – 5OTf]5+, [4⊃G – 4OTf]4+, and [4⊃G – 3OTf]3+. Single crystals of metallacage 4 with G suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were also obtained and provided unambiguous evidence for the formation of inclusion complex 4⊃G with a 1:1 stoichiometry (Figure S46d,e). The Ka of 4⊃G was determined to be (5.48 ± 0.31) × 103 M–1 (Figures S49 and S50), which was similar to that of 4⊃G in acetonitrile. When complex 4⊃G was irradiated for 20 min (λex = 405 nm, Figure f–i) in air at atmospheric pressure, 1O2 generated by the metallacage converted G into G–O completely, leading to the release of the guest from its cavity. Upon heating at 80 °C for 30 min, G–O was transferred back into G11 and the host–guest complex 4⊃G formed again (Figure h,i). These processes were also confirmed by the fluorescence experiments. The emission intensity at 470 nm derived from compound G decreased gradually upon photoirradiation, while the emission band at 660 nm ascribed to metallacage 4 was almost constant, suggesting the transformation of G into its endoperoxide (Figure j). After heating, the emission of the solution was restored to its initial value (Figure S51). This process is fully reversible and could be repeated at least five times with a good fatigue resistance (Figure k). Therefore, photooxidation-triggered reversible host–guest complexation was successfully prepared, which holds great potential for the construction of photoresponsive smart materials.

Conclusions

In summary, a box-shaped porphyrin-based metallacage was prepared by a multicomponent coordination-driven self-assembly. Owing to its electron-rich planar porphyrin face and suitable cavity size, the metallacage showed enhanced host–guest interactions with a series of PAHs. It was further employed to construct a reversible photoresponsive host–guest complexation system based on the photooxidation-triggered release of anthracene derivatives and the reencapsulation of guests upon heating. Our ongoing study reveals that different metalloporphyrins can also be introduced for the construction of such metallacages, suggesting the versatility of the multicomponent strategy in the construction of barrel-shaped metallacages. We believe that our current study offers a photoresponsive host–guest system, which is driven by the structural changes of guest molecules via photooxidation, which will guide the future design and applications of metallacages for stimuli-responsive materials.
  63 in total

1.  Cucurbituril-Based Molecular Recognition.

Authors:  Steven J Barrow; Setu Kasera; Matthew J Rowland; Jesús del Barrio; Oren A Scherman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Supramolecular Luminescent Sensors.

Authors:  Teresa L Mako; Joan M Racicot; Mindy Levine
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Construction of Porphyrin-Containing Metallacycle with Improved Stability and Activity within Mesoporous Carbon.

Authors:  Li-Jun Chen; Shangjun Chen; Yi Qin; Lin Xu; Guang-Qiang Yin; Jun-Long Zhu; Fan-Fan Zhu; Wei Zheng; Xiaopeng Li; Hai-Bo Yang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Intramolecular Transfer of Singlet Oxygen.

Authors:  Matthias Klaper; Torsten Linker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Long-Lived C60 Radical Anion Stabilized Inside an Electron-Deficient Coordination Cage.

Authors:  Shota Hasegawa; Shari L Meichsner; Julian J Holstein; Ananya Baksi; Müge Kasanmascheff; Guido H Clever
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Drug delivery by supramolecular design.

Authors:  Matthew J Webber; Robert Langer
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Cyclodextrin Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Applications.

Authors:  Indranil Roy; J Fraser Stoddart
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 8.  Synthetic Macrocycle-Based Nonporous Adaptive Crystals for Molecular Separation.

Authors:  Jia-Rui Wu; Ying-Wei Yang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  A Self-Assembled Cofacial Cobalt Porphyrin Prism for Oxygen Reduction Catalysis.

Authors:  Amanda N Oldacre; Alan E Friedman; Timothy R Cook
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  A mutually stabilized host-guest pair.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Hongye Wang; Jie Zhong; Ye Lei; Renfeng Du; Yang Zhang; Libo Shen; Tianyu Jiao; Yulu Zhu; Haiming Zhu; Haoran Li; Hao Li
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.