Literature DB >> 35782616

Gonadal mosaicism in GNAO1 causing neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movements; two additional variants.

Zainab Al Masseri1, Moeenaldeen AlSayed1,2.   

Abstract

Background: GNAO1 encodes an alpha subunit of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins). Mutations in GNAO1 result in two clinical phenotypes: Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy 17 (EEIE17-OMIM #615473) and Neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movements (NEDIM-OMIM #617493). Both are inherited as autosomal dominant disorders and originate mainly as de novo. Only a few are reported as gonadal mosaicism. Materials and methods: We recruited and retrospectively reviewed five patients from two families seen at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh (KFSHRC).
Results: All patients presented with severe neurodevelopmental disorder, followed by progressive dystonia and hyperkinetic movements. In addition, none of the patients had seizures which was consistent with NEDIM phenotype. The specific diagnosis was not clinically entertained and was only found on whole exome sequencing (WES), which identified two variants (c.724-8G > A & c.709G > A). Both variants were previously reported as pathogenic de novo in patients with NEDIM, and one was reported as parental gonadal mosaicism.
Conclusion: We report these variants as additional variants in GNAO1 gene that may be inherited as parental gonadal mosaicism. Both variants resulted in NEDIM with no observed clinical differences in the severity than the reported cases. This noticeable reported association between GNAO1 gene associated disorders and gonadal mosaicism should be considered in reproductive genetic counselling of affected families. Furthermore, in view of these reports, more studies with prospective data collection to explore the association between GNAO1 and gonadal mosaicism and the underlying mechanisms will be necessary.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chorea; Dystonia; EEIE17; EEIE17, Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy 17; Gonadal; Involuntary; Mosaicism; Movements; NEDIM; NEDIM, Neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movements; Neurodevelopmental

Year:  2022        PMID: 35782616      PMCID: PMC9248221          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2022.100864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep        ISSN: 2214-4269


Introduction

GNAO1 gene encodes Gαo, the α subunit of Go, a member of the Gi/o family of heterotrimeric G protein signal transducers. Go is the most abundant membrane protein in the mammalian central nervous system and plays a major role in synaptic neurotransmission and neurodevelopment (1). Gαo localizes ubiquitously throughout the brain with relatively high expression in hippocampus, striatum, and cerebellum (2). Mutation in GNAO1 gene results in two clinical phenotypes; (EEIE17-OMIM #615473), and (NEDIM-OMIM #617493) (3). Both are inherited as autosomal dominant disorders and are caused mainly by de novo mutations. The most common manifestations of NEDIM are hypotonia, developmental delay, spasticity, dystonia, and hyperkinetic movements with choreoathetosis. Before the first exacerbation of chorea, the motor syndrome typically appears nonspecific, and patients may be misdiagnosed with hypotonic or dyskinetic cerebral palsy [10], [11], [12]. To date, four variants in GNAO1 have been reported with parental gonadal mosaicism. Three variants are linked to NEDIM, and one variant caused EIEE17 [4], [6], [18], [22]. Here we report two additional variants (Table 2) in GNAO1 associated with parental gonadal mosaicism among five patients with NEDIM. Both variants have been reported previously as pathogenic de novo mutations.
Table 2

Molecular description of the variants in GNAO1 gene.

Feature No.Family I
Family II
I:1I:2I:5II:1II:2
Variantc.724-8G > Ac.724-8G > Ac.724-8G > Ac.709G > A (p.Glu237Lys)c.709G > A (p.Glu237Lys)
TestWESTargetedTargetedWESTargeted
TranscriptNM_020988NM_020988NM_020988NM_020988NM_020988
Exon77766
TypeIntronic Splice Site Acceptor MutationMissense
ClinVar (Date of report/ Number of submissions)Pathogenic (Sep 2021/3)Pathogenic (Nov 2021/3)
Allele originGermlineGermline
Cytogenetic Location16q12.216q12.216q12.216q12.216q12.2
Parent statusNegativeNegative

WES whole exome sequencing.

Materials and methods

Institutional approval

This publication was approved by the Office of Research Affairs (ORA) at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre-Riyadh (KFSHRC-R).

Patient data

We retrospectively reviewed all available clinical data and molecular findings on patients diagnosed with GNAO1 mutation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC) Riyadh.

Results (Table 1)

Family 1

Identical twin (I:1, I:2) born preterm at 34 weeks to a healthy consanguineous parents of Arab descent. They were admitted to neonatal intensive care unit shortly after birth due to prematurity for three weeks and discharged in good condition. They were noted to have delayed milestones since infancy. They walked around three years, followed by the occurrence of dystonic posturing of the lower limbs around four years and then progressing to upper extremities and face by age five. This was followed by choreoathetosis and cervical dystonia resulting in left-sided intermittent torticollis with dystonic involuntary movements. Both twins had significant speech delay. On examination at eight years, their weight was below the 3rd percentile, height was on the 3rd percentile, and head circumference was appropriate for age. Extraocular movements were normal. They had spastic quadriplegia with hypertonia, more pronounced in the lower limbs as compared to upper limbs. Deep tendon reflexes were brisk, and planters were up going bilaterally. Initially, they were diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, but as dystonia became more evident, other diagnostic possibilities were entertained, including genetic causes. Twin B (I:2) was able to walk until the age of eight years, then she lost ambulation, whereas twin A (I:1) lost the ability to walk by 12 years. The dystonic involuntary movements partially responded to Artane, Baclofen, Clonazepam, and intermittent Botox injections. The third sibling was a baby boy (I:3), a product of full-term normal vaginal delivery without complications during pregnancy with a birth weight of 2.5 kg. He was discharged home as a normal newborn. By one year of age, the family noticed global developmental delay as he could not sit alone, had poor handgrip and linguistically, he could not babble. Socially, he interacted with his surroundings, and there were no concerns regarding hearing and vision. He sat at the age of 15 months, started to walk at 20 months of age, and started babbling at the age of 24 months. Currently, he is six years old and dependent on his mother for all daily activities. On examination, his growth parameters are appropriate for his age. He has some functional eye contact, responds to social smiles and is not communicating verbally except for babbling sounds. He has dystonic spastic posture with no hyperkinetic movements and his extraocular muscle movements are normal. Excessive saliva drooling is noted. Deep tendon reflexes were brisk, and planters were upgoing bilaterally. He has hypertonia in upper and lower extremities with the latter more severely affected and can walk with an ataxic spastic gait. Phenotypic characteristic of five patients with disease-associated variants in GNAO1 gene. NA, Not Available, ID intellectual disability, DD developmental delay, * Values from initial to most recent, SD standard deviation. Molecular description of the variants in GNAO1 gene. WES whole exome sequencing. Previously reported variants in GNAO1 with their related phenotype. NEDIM Neurodevelopmental Disorder with Involuntary Movements, *EIEE17 Epileptic Encephalopathy, Early Infantile, 17.

Family 2

Two siblings (II:1, II:2) delivered by normal vaginal delivery with uneventful antenatal and postnatal course. They were found to be floppy from birth. They started to reach objects by two years. They began to stand up and walk with support for a short distance by three years. They developed involuntary movement and dystonia associated with abnormal posturing by the age of four years. Speech delay was prominent and by five years, they only spoke a few words. On examination, they had generalized hypotonia, predominantly axial with normal reflexes till the age of three years. Then at the age of five years, they started to have spasticity and hyperreflexia more prominent in the lower limbs than in the upper limbs. The muscle bulk was decreased, and the power was 3/5 with dystonic hyperkinetic movements. Currently, both siblings have severe growth retardation and spastic dystonic posture with normal head circumference.

Molecular testing

In family I, Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization, Array CGH + SNP was negative, and WES showed a heterozygous variant in GNAO1 c.724-8G > A in all affected individuals. Whereas, in family 2, WES was performed for II:1 and revealed a heterozygous missense variant in GNAO1, c.709G > A (Glu237Lys). Further targeted mutation analysis confirmed the presence of the same variant in his sibling II:2. Both variants were not detected in the parental blood samples in both families, indicating gonadal mosaicism.

Discussion

To date, over 95 patients with GNAO1 gene mutations have been reported in the literature [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [18], [19], [22]; at least 39 patients with 21 unique variants are linked to EEIE17, 45 patients with 25 unique variants are linked to NEDIM, while four variants are linked to Ohtahara syndrome. The majority of variants are; missense in nature, few deletions, and one deep intronic splicing defect. Of these, four variants (Table 3) in nine cases have been reported with parental gonadal mosaicism. Three variants (p.E246K) in dizygotic twins and two variants p.R209H and c.724-8G > A in two sets of siblings were reported as a cause of NEDIM. In these six patients with NEDIM, all had motor and linguistic developmental delay. They also have developed progressive chorea and athetosis at the age of five years. One patient had a daily exacerbation of chorea that required intensive care admission and management. Two patients had improvement in the chorea with deep brain stimulation [4], [6], [24]. One variant p.G40E was reported to cause EIEE17 in two adult brothers. Both had seizures that started in infancy, with significant findings in EEG and MRI imaging (22). In our view, instead of viewing GNAO1 mutations as distinct phenotypes, we believe that they rather represent a clinical spectrum from a severe early-onset epileptic encephalopathy to a protracted neurodevelopmental delay with a movement disorder.
Table 3

Previously reported variants in GNAO1 with their related phenotype.

NoReferenceVariantOriginPhenotype
1.LawGly40Arg*De novoEIEE17
2.GawlinskiGly45Glu*De novoEIEE17
3.NakamuraAsp174Gly*De novoOhtahara syndrome
4.Nakamura191_197*De novoOhtahara syndrome
5.NakamuraGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
6.NakamuraIle279Asn*De novoOhtahara syndrome
7.Marce-GrauLeu199Pro*De novoEIEE17
8.SaitsuGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
9.SaitsuArg209CysDe novoNEDIM
10.SaitsuAla227Val*De novoEIEE17
11.SaitsuGlu246Lys*De novoEIEE17
12.KulkarniArg209CysGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
13.KulkarniArg209CysGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
14.MenkeArg209HisDe novoNEDIM
15.MenkeArg209LeuDe novoNEDIM
16.DhamijaArg209HisDe novoNEDIM
17.AnanthArg209HisDe novoNEDIM
18.AnanthArg209GlyDe novoNEDIM
19.AnanthGlu246LysGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
20.AnanthGlu246LysGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
21.AnanthGlu246LysDe novoNEDIM
22.AnanthGlu246LysDe novoNEDIM
23.TalvikTyr231Cys*De novoOhtahara syndrome
24.YilmazGlu233ProDe novoNEDIM
25.EuroepiomicsAsn270His*De novoEIEE17
26.EuroepiomicsPhe275Ser*De novoEIEE17
27.Arya RGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
28.BruunGly40Arg*De novoEIEE17
29.DantiSer47Gly*De novoEIEE17
30.DantiArg209Cys*De novoEIEE17
31.DantiArg209Cys*De novoEIEE17
32.Dantic.723 + 1G > ADe novoNEDIM
33.DantiIle56Thr*De novoEIEE17
34.DantiGly40Arg*De novoEIEE17
35.DantiGlu246GlyDe novoNEDIM
36.McKenna KellyGly40ArgDe novoNEDIM
37.McKenna KellyGly40TrpDe novoNEDIM
38.McKenna KellyGly40GluGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
39.McKenna KellyGly40GluGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
40.McKenna KellySer207TyrDe novoNEDIM
41.McKenna KellyArg209HisDe novoNEDIM
42.McKenna KellyArg209CysDe novoNEDIM
43.McKenna KellyAla221AspDe novoNEDIM
44.McKenna KellyTyr231CysDe novoNEDIM
45.McKenna KellyAsp237ValDe novoNEDIM
46.McKenna KellyIle279AsnDe novoNEDIM
47.McKenna KellyTyr291AsnDe novoNEDIM
48.McKenna KellyIle344delDe novoNEDIM
49.McKenna KellyArg349_G352delinsQGCADe novoNEDIM
50.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209HisDe novoNEDIM
51.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209HisDe novoNEDIM
52.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209HisDe novoNEDIM
53.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209HisDe novoNEDIM
54.Feng H [13], [14]Gly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
55.Feng H [13], [14]Gly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
56.Feng H [13], [14]Gly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
57.Feng H [13], [14]Glu246LysDe novoNEDIM
58.Feng H [13], [14]Glu246LysDe novoNEDIM
59.Feng H [13], [14]Glu246LysDe novoNEDIM
60.Feng H [13], [14]Glu246LysDe novoNEDIM
61.Feng H [13], [14]Glu246LysDe novoNEDIM
62.Feng H [13], [14]Gly42ArgDe novoNEDIM
63.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209Cys*De novoEIEE17
64.Feng H [13], [14]Ile279Asp*De novoEIEE17
65.Feng H [13], [14]Ile279Asp*De novoEIEE17
66.Feng H [13], [14]Thr191_Phe197del*De novoEIEE17
67.Feng H [13], [14]Arg209GlyDe novoNEDIM
68.Feng H [13], [14]Ala227Val*De novoEIEE17
69.Feng H [13], [14]Tyr231Cys*De novoEIEE17
70.Feng H [13], [14]Phe275Ser*De novoEIEE17
71.Feng H [13], [14]Leu199Pro*De novoEIEE17
72.Feng H [13], [14]Asp270His*De novoEIEE17
73.Feng H [13], [14]Gly40Arg*De novoEIEE17
74.Feng H [13], [14]Asp174Gly*De novoEIEE17
75.Epi & EpiIle279Asp*De novoEIEE17
76.GeraldHis371_372del*De novoEIEE17
77.Sakamoto S (8)Arg209CysDe novoNEDIM
78.SchorlingGlu246LysDe novoNEDIM
79.SchorlingGlu246LysDe novoNEDIM
80.SchorlingGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
81.SchorlingGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
82.UedaGly45Arg*De novoEIEE17
83.XiongGly203Arg*De novoEIEE17
84.Yang Xc.724-8G > AGonadal mosaicismDD & MD
85.Yang Xc.724-8G > AGonadal mosaicismDD & MD
86.Yang Xc.136A > G(p.K46E)De novoWest
87.Yang Xc.687C > G(p.S229R)De novoWest & MD
88.Yang Xc.470 T > C (p.L157R)De novoWest & MD
89.Yang Xc.810C > A (p.N270K)De novoOhtahara and MD
90.Yang Xc.817G > T (p.D273Y)*De novoEIEE and MD
91.Yang Xc.118G > C(p.G40R)De novoWest
92.Yang Xc.692A > G(p.Y231C)*De novoEIEE and MD
93.Yang Xc.607G > A(p.G203R)*De novoEIEE and MD
94.Yang Xc.736G > A(p.E246R)De novoDD
95.Miyamoto Sc.724-8G > AGonadal mosaicismNEDIM
96.Retterer Kc.724-8G > ADe novoNEDIM
97.Retterer Kp.G203RDe novoNEDIM

NEDIM Neurodevelopmental Disorder with Involuntary Movements, *EIEE17 Epileptic Encephalopathy, Early Infantile, 17.

We describe here five patients from two families (See Fig. 1) with global developmental delay, hypotonia, spastic quadriplegia, and severe hyperkinetic movement disorder attributed to gonadal mosaicism, expanding the list of the mutations in GNAO1 gene associated with this type of inheritance. Their phenotype was consistent with NEDIM. The oldest patient is 16, and the youngest patient is 6. None of our patients had clinical seizures, but they showed abnormal EEGs. Three patients presented in early infancy with hypotonia, whereas the other two had a normal initial neonatal period followed by global developmental delay at four and five months, respectively. The dystonia started in lower extremities and later extended gradually to the upper extremities and facial muscles. They all exhibited hyperkinetic movement with dystonia between four and seven years with partial response to pharmacotherapy. Eventually, they all lost the ability to ambulate as they grew older without triggering factors and became wheelchair-bound. They all demonstrated severe linguistic delay, but none had evidence of dysphagia. To date, they are all alive, and none of them have deep brain stimulation yet.
Fig. 1

Pedigrees of the two families with GANO1.

Pedigrees of the two families with GANO1. Using whole exome sequencing, two heterozygous variants have been detected in GNAO1 gene. The variants were not detected in parental blood samples from either family and all siblings are healthy. The presence of the same heterozygous variant in multiple children and its absence in both parents supports parental gonadal mosaicism. E237K variant was reported before in two patients with NEDIM [15], [23]. Also, this variant was reported in ClinVar database in an individual with microcephaly, seizures, and muscle weakness. The other variant c.724-8G > A has been reported by GeneDx in Clinvar as de novo in two presumably unrelated individuals with similar clinical features. In three recent reports, four additional patients with c.724-8G > A variant has been described in three families; two patients with germline mosaicism, one patient who inherited the variant from her mother with low-prevalent somatic mosaicism and one as de novo [24], [25], [28]. This variant caused abnormal splicing of in-frame 6-bp intronic retention, leading to 2 amino acid insertion (p.Thr241_Asn242insProGln). Immunoblotting and immunostaining using wild type and mutant GNAO1 vectors showed no significant differences in protein expression level, but the cellular localization pattern of this mutant was partially shifted to the cytoplasm whereas WT was exclusively localized in the cellular membrane. Investigators suggested that this mutant might have a loss of function effect alongside with dominant negative effect predisposing to movement disorders without seizures (24). In some reports (22), parental somatic mosaicism has been observed in 6.6% - 8.3% of parents who had a child with a diagnosis of an apparently de novo monogenic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused by different genes [23], [24], [26], [27]. The level of mosaicism in their parents is widely correlated with the severity of disease and symptoms tend to appear in case with a mosaic rate of >10% (27). There is not enough evidence that GNAO1 gene is associated with parental gonadal mosaicism more than the other genes; however, the association is significantly noticeable and should be considered when families are counselled about the recurrence risk and prenatal testing. To conclude, we report two variants in GNAO1 gene inherited as parental gonadal mosaicism. Both variants resulted in NEDIM with no observed clinical differences in the severity away from the reported cases. This noticeable reported association between GNAO1 gene associated disorders and gonadal mosaicism should be considered in reproductive genetic counselling of affected families. Furthermore, in view of these reports, more studies with prospective data collection to explore the association between GNAO1 and gonadal mosaicism and the underlying mechanisms will be necessary.

Funding sources

No funding.

Authors contributions

ZAM reviewed and summarized the literature and wrote the manuscript. MDS edited the manuscript and contributed to the clinical diagnosis and management of the patients.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Table 1

Phenotypic characteristic of five patients with disease-associated variants in GNAO1 gene.

Feature No.Family I
Family II
I:1I:2I:3II:1II:2
Demographics
GenderFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMale
Current age16 years16 years6 years14 years11 years
Age of onset5 Months5 Months4 MonthsBirthBirth
Initial presentationDDDDDDHypotoniaHypotonia
DystoniaYesYesYesYesYes
ChoreoathetosisYesYesYesYesYes
DyskinesiaYesYesNoYesYes
Stereotypic hand movementsYesYesYesYesYes
SpasticityQuadriplegiaQuadriplegiaQuadriparesisQuadriplegiaQuadriplegia
SeizureNoNoNoNoNo
SpeechAnarthriaAnarthriaAnarthriaDelayedDelayed
Thoracolumbar scoliosisYesNoNoYesNA
MedicationsArtane & BaclofenNoneNoneNANA
Functional statusWheelchairWheelchairSpastic gaitWheelchairWheelchair



Clinical examination
Weight (kg)28 (−6.1 SD)33 (−4 SD)17 (−1.9 SD)16 (−5 SD)NA
Height (cm)150 (−1.9 SD)139 (−2.8 SD)111 (−1.6 SD)119 (−2.4 SD)NA
BMI12.714.314.211.5NA
MicrocephalyNoNoNoNoNA
Eye ExamNANANANormalNA



Laboratory workup and radiological imaging
CK (24–192 U/L)731NormalNormalNormalNA
Lactate mmol/lNormalNANA2.7–4.4–1.5*NA
EEGSpikes, multiregional, maximum mid temporal. Intermittent slow activity, bitemporalSpike, right and left anterior mid temporal. Intermittent slow activity, bitemporalBilateral temporooccipital intermittent slow activityBitemporal independent spikes/sharp wave more from the left side. Intermittent independent bitemporal delta slowingNA
MRINormalNormalNormalNormalNA
Bone Scan Z-score/SDOsteopenia (−2.1)Osteopenia (−2.0&-1.0)NANANA
AliveYesYesYesYesYes

NA, Not Available, ID intellectual disability, DD developmental delay, * Values from initial to most recent, SD standard deviation.

  26 in total

1.  De Novo mutations in GNAO1, encoding a Gαo subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins, cause epileptic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Nakamura; Hirofumi Kodera; Tenpei Akita; Masaaki Shiina; Mitsuhiro Kato; Hideki Hoshino; Hiroshi Terashima; Hitoshi Osaka; Shinichi Nakamura; Jun Tohyama; Tatsuro Kumada; Tomonori Furukawa; Satomi Iwata; Takashi Shiihara; Masaya Kubota; Satoko Miyatake; Eriko Koshimizu; Kiyomi Nishiyama; Mitsuko Nakashima; Yoshinori Tsurusaki; Noriko Miyake; Kiyoshi Hayasaka; Kazuhiro Ogata; Atsuo Fukuda; Naomichi Matsumoto; Hirotomo Saitsu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  GNAO1-related movement disorder with life-threatening exacerbations: movement phenomenology and response to DBS.

Authors:  Michaela Waak; Shekeeb S Mohammad; David Coman; Kate Sinclair; Lisa Copeland; Peter Silburn; Terry Coyne; Jim McGill; Mary O'Regan; Richard Selway; Joseph Symonds; Padraic Grattan-Smith; Jean-Pierre Lin; Russell C Dale; Stephen Malone
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Progressive Movement Disorder in Brothers Carrying a GNAO1 Mutation Responsive to Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Neil Kulkarni; Sha Tang; Ratan Bhardwaj; Saunder Bernes; Theresa A Grebe
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Phenotypic spectrum of GNAO1 variants: epileptic encephalopathy to involuntary movements with severe developmental delay.

Authors:  Hirotomo Saitsu; Ryoko Fukai; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Yasunari Sakai; Masakazu Mimaki; Nobuhiko Okamoto; Yasuhiro Suzuki; Yukifumi Monden; Hiroshi Saito; Barak Tziperman; Michiko Torio; Satoshi Akamine; Nagahisa Takahashi; Hitoshi Osaka; Takanori Yamagata; Kazuyuki Nakamura; Yoshinori Tsurusaki; Mitsuko Nakashima; Noriko Miyake; Masaaki Shiina; Kazuhiro Ogata; Naomichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  GNAO1 Mutation-Induced Pediatric Dystonic Storm Rescue With Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  C Michael Honey; Armaan K Malhotra; Maja Tarailo-Graovac; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Gabriella Horvath; Adi Sulistyanto
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Spectrum of neurodevelopmental disease associated with the GNAO1 guanosine triphosphate-binding region.

Authors:  McKenna Kelly; Meredith Park; Ivana Mihalek; Anne Rochtus; Marie Gramm; Eduardo Pérez-Palma; Erika Takle Axeen; Christina Y Hung; Heather Olson; Lindsay Swanson; Irina Anselm; Lauren C Briere; Frances A High; David A Sweetser; Saima Kayani; Molly Snyder; Sophie Calvert; Ingrid E Scheffer; Edward Yang; Jeff L Waugh; Dennis Lal; Olaf Bodamer; Annapurna Poduri
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  Parental Mosaicism in "De Novo" Epileptic Encephalopathies.

Authors:  Candace T Myers; Georgina Hollingsworth; Alison M Muir; Amy L Schneider; Zoe Thuesmunn; Allison Knupp; Chontelle King; Amy Lacroix; Michele G Mehaffey; Samuel F Berkovic; Gemma L Carvill; Lynette G Sadleir; Ingrid E Scheffer; Heather C Mefford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Movement disorder in GNAO1 encephalopathy associated with gain-of-function mutations.

Authors:  Huijie Feng; Benita Sjögren; Behirda Karaj; Vincent Shaw; Aysegul Gezer; Richard R Neubig
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications.

Authors:  Kyle Retterer; Jane Juusola; Megan T Cho; Patrik Vitazka; Francisca Millan; Federica Gibellini; Annette Vertino-Bell; Nizar Smaoui; Julie Neidich; Kristin G Monaghan; Dianalee McKnight; Renkui Bai; Sharon Suchy; Bethany Friedman; Jackie Tahiliani; Daniel Pineda-Alvarez; Gabriele Richard; Tracy Brandt; Eden Haverfield; Wendy K Chung; Sherri Bale
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Phenotypes of GNAO1 Variants in a Chinese Cohort.

Authors:  Xiaoling Yang; Xueyang Niu; Ying Yang; Miaomiao Cheng; Jing Zhang; Jiaoyang Chen; Zhixian Yang; Yuehua Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.