McKenna Kelly1,2, Meredith Park1, Ivana Mihalek3, Anne Rochtus1, Marie Gramm4, Eduardo Pérez-Palma4, Erika Takle Axeen1,5, Christina Y Hung3, Heather Olson1,6,7, Lindsay Swanson8, Irina Anselm7,8, Lauren C Briere9, Frances A High9, David A Sweetser9, Saima Kayani10, Molly Snyder11, Sophie Calvert12, Ingrid E Scheffer13, Edward Yang14,15, Jeff L Waugh7,8,16, Dennis Lal4,17,18, Olaf Bodamer3,18,19,20, Annapurna Poduri1,6,7,18,21. 1. Epilepsy Genetics Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire. 3. Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Cologne Center for Genomics, Cologne, Germany. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 6. Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Medical Genetics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. Department of Pediatrics, Neurology, and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 11. Department of Neurology, Children's Health, Dallas, Texas. 12. Neuroscience Department, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 13. Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Austin Health and Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 14. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 15. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 16. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas. 17. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 18. Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 19. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 20. Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 21. F. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the phenotypic spectrum associated with GNAO1 variants and establish genotype-protein structure-phenotype relationships. METHODS: We evaluated the phenotypes of 14 patients with GNAO1 variants, analyzed their variants for potential pathogenicity, and mapped them, along with those in the literature, on a three-dimensional structural protein model. RESULTS: The 14 patients in our cohort, including one sibling pair, had 13 distinct, heterozygous GNAO1 variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. We attributed the same variant in two siblings to parental mosaicism. Patients initially presented with seizures beginning in the first 3 months of life (8/14), developmental delay (4/14), hypotonia (1/14), or movement disorder (1/14). All patients had hypotonia and developmental delay ranging from mild to severe. Nine had epilepsy, and nine had movement disorders, including dystonia, ataxia, chorea, and dyskinesia. The 13 GNAO1 variants in our patients are predicted to result in amino acid substitutions or deletions in the GNAO1 guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding region, analogous to those in previous publications. Patients with variants affecting amino acids 207-221 had only movement disorder and hypotonia. Patients with variants affecting the C-terminal region had the mildest phenotypes. SIGNIFICANCE: GNAO1 encephalopathy most frequently presents with seizures beginning in the first 3 months of life. Concurrent movement disorders are also a prominent feature in the spectrum of GNAO1 encephalopathy. All variants affected the GTP-binding domain of GNAO1, highlighting the importance of this region for G-protein signaling and neurodevelopment. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the phenotypic spectrum associated with GNAO1 variants and establish genotype-protein structure-phenotype relationships. METHODS: We evaluated the phenotypes of 14 patients with GNAO1 variants, analyzed their variants for potential pathogenicity, and mapped them, along with those in the literature, on a three-dimensional structural protein model. RESULTS: The 14 patients in our cohort, including one sibling pair, had 13 distinct, heterozygous GNAO1 variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. We attributed the same variant in two siblings to parental mosaicism. Patients initially presented with seizures beginning in the first 3 months of life (8/14), developmental delay (4/14), hypotonia (1/14), or movement disorder (1/14). All patients had hypotonia and developmental delay ranging from mild to severe. Nine had epilepsy, and nine had movement disorders, including dystonia, ataxia, chorea, and dyskinesia. The 13 GNAO1 variants in our patients are predicted to result in amino acid substitutions or deletions in the GNAO1guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding region, analogous to those in previous publications. Patients with variants affecting amino acids 207-221 had only movement disorder and hypotonia. Patients with variants affecting the C-terminal region had the mildest phenotypes. SIGNIFICANCE: GNAO1encephalopathy most frequently presents with seizures beginning in the first 3 months of life. Concurrent movement disorders are also a prominent feature in the spectrum of GNAO1encephalopathy. All variants affected the GTP-binding domain of GNAO1, highlighting the importance of this region for G-protein signaling and neurodevelopment. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Kevin C Slep; Michele A Kercher; Thomas Wieland; Ching-Kang Chen; Melvin I Simon; Paul B Sigler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Jason M Kehrl; Kinshuk Sahaya; Hans M Dalton; Raelene A Charbeneau; Kevin T Kohut; Kristen Gilbert; Madeline C Pelz; Jack Parent; Richard R Neubig Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2014-04-05 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Sarah E Heron; Brigid M Regan; Rebekah V Harris; Alison E Gardner; Matthew J Coleman; Mark F Bennett; Bronwyn E Grinton; Katherine L Helbig; Michael R Sperling; Sheryl Haut; Eric B Geller; Peter Widdess-Walsh; James T Pelekanos; Melanie Bahlo; Slavé Petrovski; Erin L Heinzen; Michael S Hildebrand; Mark A Corbett; Ingrid E Scheffer; Jozef Gécz; Samuel F Berkovic Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christelle M El Achkar; Merle Harrer; Lacey Smith; McKenna Kelly; Sumaiya Iqbal; Snezana Maljevic; Cristina E Niturad; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Annapurna Poduri; Edward Yang; Dennis Lal; Holger Lerche; Rikke S Møller; Heather E Olson Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 11.274
Authors: Brian S Muntean; Ikuo Masuho; Maria Dao; Laurie P Sutton; Stefano Zucca; Hideki Iwamoto; Dipak N Patil; Dandan Wang; Lutz Birnbaumer; Randy D Blakely; Brock Grill; Kirill A Martemyanov Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 9.423