| Literature DB >> 35782280 |
Mabliny Thuany1, Beat Knechtle2, Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis3, Thayse Natacha Gomes4.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance stability of elite half-marathoners of both sexes. The study was composed of 24 elite athletes (12 female and 12 male), ranked among the Senior World TOP20 half-marathoners, who completed a half-marathon race for at least three consecutive years. Tracking was tested using autocorrelations and Kappa Cohen. Autocorrelation revealed a significant association, but a decrease in correlation among the years in both sexes. The overall weighted kappa showed lower stability in performance for both sexes (K = 0.191 and K = -0.245) than for males. These findings suggest that both female and male elite half-marathoners showed low stability in performance during three events. Besides that, athletes with a better performance tended to present the highest performance stability. It is recommended that coaches track the developmental trajectories of the athletes to comprised the changes in performance across the years, as to provide environmental characteristics that can influence performance.Entities:
Keywords: Elite athletes; Endurance; Running; Tracking
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782280 PMCID: PMC9219281 DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Health Sci ISSN: 2666-3376
Fig. 1Athletes’ distribution by country.
Fig. 2Individual trajectory of half-marathoner elite athletes during three years.
Fig. 3Fitted values to the trajectory in three years, with confidence interval.
Autocorrelation results for both sexes, considering three years.
| Women | Men | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.935∗∗ | 0.790∗∗ | 1 | 0.871∗∗ | 0.867∗∗ | |
| Bias | 0 | −0.019 | −0.079 | 0 | −0.009 | 0.004 |
| Std. Error | 0 | 0.074 | 0.266 | 0 | 0.101 | 0.063 |
| Lower | 1 | 0.714 | 0.033 | 1 | 0.600 | 0.707 |
| Upper | 1 | 0.989 | 0.984 | 1 | 0.961 | 0.961 |
| 0.935∗∗ | 1 | 0.819∗∗ | 0.871∗∗ | 1 | 0.865∗∗ | |
| Bias | −0.019 | 0 | −0.068 | −0.009 | 0 | −0.014 |
| Std. Error | 0.074 | 0 | 0.254 | 0.101 | 0 | 0.101 |
| Lower | 0.714 | 1 | 0.025 | 0.600 | 1 | 0.562 |
| Upper | 0.989 | 1 | 0.987 | 0.961 | 1 | 0.954 |
| 0.790∗∗ | 0.819∗∗ | 1 | 0.867∗∗ | 0.865∗∗ | 1 | |
| Bias | −0.079 | −0.068 | 0 | 0.004 | −0.014 | 0 |
| Std. Error | 0.266 | 0.254 | 0 | 0.063 | 0.101 | 0 |
| Lower | 0.033 | 0.025 | 1 | 0.707 | 0.562 | 1 |
| Upper | 0.984 | 0.987 | 1 | 0.961 | 0.954 | 1 |
∗∗ Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level; ∗ Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level; bootstrapping results were based in 5000 bootstrap samples; Pace 1, running pace in the first year; Pace 2, running pace in the second year; Pace 3, running pace in the third year.
Kappa Cohen results for each track, to both sexes.
| Track | Women | Men |
|---|---|---|
| −0.125 | −0.161 | |
| −0.037 | −0.204 | |
| −0.371 | −0.333 | |
| −0.191 | −0.249 | |
| 0.04–−0.42 | 0.005–−0.503 |
> P66 (percentile 66); P33 – P66 (percentile 33 and percentile 66); < P33 (below than percentile 33); 95%CI (95% of Confidence Interval).