Literature DB >> 35782244

Differential diagnosis of B-mode ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3-4a lesions in conjunction with shear-wave elastography using conservative and aggressive approaches.

Wenxiang Zhi1,2, Aiyu Miao1,2, Chao You2,3, Jin Zhou1,2, Haixian Zhang1,2, Xiaoli Zhu2,4, Yu Wang1,2, Cai Chang1,2.   

Abstract

Background: The high false-positive rates of US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3-4a breast lesions leads to excessive biopsies of many benign lesions, and our aim was to investigate the diagnostic performance achieved by adding a maximum elasticity (Emax) of shear-wave elastography (SWE) to ultrasound (US) to evaluate US BI-RADS category 3-4a breast lesions using conservative and aggressive approaches. We explored the capacity of using this method to avoid unnecessary biopsies without increasing the probability of missing breast cancers.
Methods: A total of 123 breast lesions of 120 patients classified as BI-RADS category 3 or 4a were enrolled from January 2019 to December 2019. The US features were evaluated according to the US BI-RADS lexicon. The maximum diameter measured on the US was defined as the size of the lesion. The Emax was assessed by SWE, and the average Emax of breast lesions on two images were calculated and recorded as the final maximum Young's modulus. The diagnostic performance of the combined B-mode US and SWE approach for BI-RADS category 3-4a breast lesions was tested using a conservative approach and an aggressive approach. In the conservative approach, the lesions were downgraded with Emax of 30 kPa or less and upgraded with Emax of 160 kPa or more. In the aggressive approach, the lesions were downgraded with Emax of 80 kPa or less and upgraded with Emax of 160 kPa or more. Pathologic results were defined as the reference standard.
Results: Among all 123 breast lesions, there were 60 lesions classified as BI-RADS category 3 and 63 lesions classified as BI-RADS category 4a. Compared to the B-mode US, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the combined B-mode US and SWE with a conservative approach changed from 88.9% to 94.4%, 55.2% to 60.0%, 25.4% to 28.8%, 96.7% to 98.4%, 60.2% to 65.0%, and 0.721 to 0.772, respectively. The specificity, PPV, and accuracy of combined B-mode US and SWE with an aggressive approach increased from 55.2% to 72.4%, 25.4% to 29.3%, and 60.2% to 71.5%, respectively, but this was accompanied with decreases in the sensitivity from 88.9% to 66.7%, the NPV from 96.7% to 92.7%, and the AUC from 0.721 to 0.695. Conclusions: The addition of SWE improves the diagnostic performance of breast US. Adding the diagnostic criteria of SWE to the BI-RADS assessment of B-mode US, downgrading the lesions with Emax 30 kPa or less, and upgrading the lesions with Emax 160 kPa or more helped discriminate low suspicion lesions from benign lesions in order to decrease false-positive findings and avoid missing cancer diagnosis. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS); Ultrasound (US); breast lesion; maximum elasticity (Emax); shear-wave elastography (SWE)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35782244      PMCID: PMC9246754          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  29 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Kyung Hwa Han; Jeong-Ah Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance.

Authors:  J Shang; L-T Ruan; Y-Y Wang; X-J Zhang; Y Dang; B Liu; W-L Wang; Y Song; S-J Chang
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Shear wave elastography contribution in ultrasound diagnosis management of breast lesions.

Authors:  T Klotz; V Boussion; F Kwiatkowski; V Dieu-de Fraissinette; A Bailly-Glatre; S Lemery; L Boyer
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.026

5.  Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?

Authors:  Hye Jeong Choi; Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Two-dimensional shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis between mastitis and breast malignancy.

Authors:  Shui-Qing Liu; Yan-Ping Liu; Bang-Guo Zhou; Xiao-Hong Deng; Xiao-Long Li; Li-Hua Xiang; Wei-Wei Ren; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Ellen B Mendelson; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Shear wave elastography of tumour growth in a human breast cancer model with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Foucauld Chamming's; H Latorre-Ossa; M A Le Frère-Belda; V Fitoussi; T Quibel; F Assayag; E Marangoni; G Autret; D Balvay; L Pidial; J L Gennisson; M Tanter; C A Cuenod; O Clément; L S Fournier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Breast mass characterization using shear wave elastography and ultrasound.

Authors:  S Hari; S B Paul; R Vidyasagar; E Dhamija; A D Adarsh; S Thulkar; S Mathur; V Sreenivas; S Sharma; A Srivastava; V Seenu; R Prashad
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.026

10.  The volumetric-tumour histogram-based analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and non-Gaussian diffusion MRI: association with prognostic factors in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao You; Jianwei Li; Wenxiang Zhi; Yanqiong Chen; Wentao Yang; Yajia Gu; Weijun Peng
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.