| Literature DB >> 35780170 |
Nikolay Oskolkov1,2, Malgorzata Santel3, Hemang M Parikh4, Ola Ekström1, Gray J Camp3, Eri Miyamoto-Mikami5, Kristoffer Ström1,6, Bilal Ahmad Mir1, Dmytro Kryvokhyzha1, Mikko Lehtovirta1,7, Hiroyuki Kobayashi8, Ryo Kakigi9, Hisashi Naito5, Karl-Fredrik Eriksson1, Björn Nystedt10, Noriyuki Fuku5, Barbara Treutlein3, Svante Pääbo3,11, Ola Hansson12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle fiber type distribution has implications for human health, muscle function, and performance. This knowledge has been gathered using labor-intensive and costly methodology that limited these studies. Here, we present a method based on muscle tissue RNA sequencing data (totRNAseq) to estimate the distribution of skeletal muscle fiber types from frozen human samples, allowing for a larger number of individuals to be tested.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35780170 PMCID: PMC9250227 DOI: 10.1186/s13395-022-00299-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Skelet Muscle ISSN: 2044-5040 Impact factor: 5.063
Fig. 1A single-nuclei RNAseq of the human skeletal muscle. Slow- (type I) and fast-twitch (type II) fibers form species-specific distinct clusters of nuclei. a Five major clusters of nuclei were identified using graph-based clustering built on Louvain modularity optimization. For visualization of the nuclei populations, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) non-linear dimension reduction was applied. b Examples of nuclei expression patterns for genes separating different clusters, i.e., ATP2A1, MYBPC2, and MYH2 are enriched in cluster A (type II fiber), XPO4, ATP2A2, TPM3, and MYH7B are enriched in cluster B (type I fiber), LRRTM4 is enriched in cluster D (endothelial), and MECOM is enriched in cluster E. c Complete list of the 48 marker genes separating the five clusters
Description of the Muscle SATellite cell study (MSAT)
| Age (years) | 39 | 21 | 54 | 36 | 8 |
| Weight (kgBW) | 39 | 70 | 97 | 79 | 6 |
| BMI (kgBW/m2) | 39 | 19 | 31 | 24 | 3 |
| VO2peak (ml/kgBW per min) | 39 | 31 | 70 | 52 | 8 |
| Peak power (W/kgBW) | 39 | 11 | 16 | 13 | 1 |
| Average power (W/kgBW | 39 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 1 |
| Type I (%) | 35 | 40 | 81 | 62 | 10 |
| Type II (%) | 35 | 19 | 60 | 38 | 10 |
Note: Type II fiber types are given as type II = type IIa + type IIx, all male subjects
Fig. 2a Correlation between the estimated proportions of muscle fiber nuclei types from totRNAseq data and muscle fiber types from ATPase staining in the MSAT study, r = 0.44 [0.13–0.67], [95% CI] at pspearman = 5.70 × 10–3, n = 39. b Correlation between the estimated proportions of muscle fiber nuclei types from totRNAseq data and muscle fiber types from myosin heavy chain distribution in the JMS study, r = 0.83 [0.61–0.93], [95% CI] at pspearman = 2.00 × 10–6, n = 22. c Estimated proportions of muscle fiber nuclei types from totRNAseq data from the genotype-tissue expression project (ntot = 569). Women had a higher proportion of type I fiber nuclei compared to men, 68% [54–76%] versus 56% [39–71%], median [95% CI], pMann-Whitney = 3.1 × 10–7, nwomen = 171, and nmen = 398. d Correlations between the estimated proportions of muscle fiber nuclei types from totRNAseq data and muscle fiber types from ATPase staining in the MSAT study at different sequencing depths
Description of the Juntendo Muscle Study (JMS)
| Age (years) | 23 | 20 | 32 | 23 | 3 |
| Weight (kgBW) | 23 | 50 | 72 | 61 | 6 |
| BMI (kgBW/m2) | 23 | 17 | 26 | 22 | 2 |
| Type I (%) | 23 | 27 | 60 | 40 | 9 |
| Type II (%) | 23 | 40 | 73 | 60 | 9 |
Note: Type II fiber types are given as type II = type IIa + type IIx, 10 female and 13 male subjects