Literature DB >> 3577713

Revision of infected knee arthroplasty.

S Bengtson, K Knutson, L Lidgren.   

Abstract

Sixteen infected knee arthroplasties were revised and followed for 5 (1-10) years. There were nine recurrences of infections, but in one of these a second revision was successfully carried out. The remaining seven revisions resulted in only four functioning prostheses. The results were poor for hinged and stabilized prostheses for which arthrodesis, after eradication of the infection, is recommended. Infected compartmental prostheses with good bone stock could be treated with a two-stage procedure using tricompartmental revision prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3577713     DOI: 10.3109/17453678609014776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  4 in total

1.  Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher R Gooding; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers in two-stage management of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Pitto; I A Spika
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Prophylactic use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: Justified or not?

Authors:  Amit K Srivastav; Biren Nadkarni; Shekhar Srivastav; Vivek Mittal; Shekhar Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  A systematic review of the evidence for single stage and two stage revision of infected knee replacement.

Authors:  James P M Masters; Nicholas A Smith; Pedro Foguet; Mike Reed; Helen Parsons; Andrew P Sprowson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.