Literature DB >> 20878287

Durable infection control and function with the PROSTALAC spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty.

Christopher R Gooding1, Bassam A Masri, Clive P Duncan, Nelson V Greidanus, Donald S Garbuz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty is recognized as the gold standard in the treatment of infection. However, traditional spacers limit function in the interval between the two stages and may cause instability, scarring, and bone erosion. The PROSTALAC knee spacer is an antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer that allows some movement of the knee between stages. Whether motion enhances long-term function is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore identify the rate of control of infection using the PROSTALAC exchange spacer and to assess the clinical outcome after implantation with a definitive implant.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 115 knees that underwent two-stage exchange with the PROSTALAC spacer. Forty-eight of these had a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 9 years; range, 5-12 years).
RESULTS: At last review, 101 of the 115 knees (88%) had no evidence of infection. Of the 14 knees that became reinfected, four were from the same organism and 10 were with a different organism. After further intervention, using the two-stage approach again, the infection was controlled in 12 of the 14 initially reinfected cases, resulting in a failure to cure in only two cases. We observed improvements in mean WOMAC, Oxford, UCLA, and Patient Satisfaction scores at last review.
CONCLUSIONS: The PROSTALAC functional spacer was associated with a 98% rate of control of infection and improvements in the quality-of-life outcomes in the treatment of chronically infected total knee arthroplasties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20878287      PMCID: PMC3048254          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1579-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. 1983.

Authors:  John N Insall; Francesca M Thompson; Barry D Brause
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D Campbell; R W McGraw; C P Beauchamp; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

3.  Session IV: Salvage of the infected total knee replacement. Infection: the problem.

Authors:  C H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Kelly; Henry D Clarke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Long-term results in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  A König; S Kirschner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz; S Darrin Wilson; M Gavan McAlinden; Min Xu; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparison of a static with a mobile spacer in total knee infection.

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Michael Muncie; Tiffera R Tarbox; Linda L Higgins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G S Gill; A B Joshi
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  2001

9.  Patient satisfaction and functional status after aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty using the PROSTALAC articulating spacer.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; David Dunlop; Donald S Garbuz; Robert McGraw; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; Bassam A Masri; David Dunlop; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Robert McGraw; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  [Dynamic versus static cement spacer in periprosthetic knee infection: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Musa Citak; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric Röhner; Christoph Windisch; Katy Nuetzmann; Max Rau; Michael Arnhold; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prevention of surgical site infections in bone and joint procedures.

Authors:  Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Articulated spacer provides long-term knee improvement after two-stage reimplantation.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Chiara Del Regno; Katia Corona; Rocco D'Apolito; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Do dynamic cement-on-cement knee spacers provide better function and activity during two-stage exchange?

Authors:  David J Jaekel; Judd S Day; Gregg R Klein; Harlan Levine; Javad Parvizi; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection With a Two-stage Protocol Using Static Spacers.

Authors:  Paul Lichstein; Sharlene Su; Hakan Hedlund; Gina Suh; William J Maloney; Stuart B Goodman; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy or quadriceps snip in two-stage revision for prosthetic knee infection? A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Bharat Sharma; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.