Literature DB >> 35775205

Nosocomial severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission arising from a case of N-gene dropout on reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing.

Liang En Ian Wee1,2, Karrie Kwan-Ki Ko3,4,5, Edwin Philip Conceicao6, May Kyawt Aung6, Myat Oo Aung6, Yong Yang6, Shalvi Arora6, Chayaporn Suphavilai5, Indumathi Venkatachalam1,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35775205      PMCID: PMC9273731          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   6.520


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor—During the coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, in-hospital surveillance via serial severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing has repeatedly demonstrated its utility in early detection, isolation, and interruption of nosocomial transmission. However, analytical sensitivity of real-time, reverse-transcriptase, polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2 is crucial in ensuring accurate results and early detection of COVID-19 cases and, thus, to mitigate nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has been demonstrated to negatively affect analytical sensitivity of rRT-PCR assays. For instance, failure of the N-gene assay has occurred with certain SARS-CoV-2 variants. N-gene point mutations have been reported in the literature, resulting in cases of diagnostic escapes. To date, however, no confirmed case of nosocomial transmission arising from N-gene dropout has been reported in the literature. We highlight here a case of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission arising from a case of N-gene dropout, which illustrates the importance of proper interpretation when discrepant results are encountered on different gene-targets utilized in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing. This study was conducted as part of an outbreak investigation, and ethics approval was not required under our institutional review board guidelines. At our institution, a large tertiary-care hospital in Singapore, from June 21, 2021, onward, all inpatients were routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 on admission via both rapid antigen detection (RAD) testing as well as PCR, as part of enhanced infection-prevention measures. Routine SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing was conducted using the Cepheid GeneXpert Xpert Xpress assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), a proprietary FDA-approved assay targeting both the E-gene and N-gene; while the BD-Veritor SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid test kit (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was used for SARS-CoV-2 RAD testing. Inpatients were subsequently tested at weekly intervals for SARS-CoV-2 infection via PCR. Up to January 2022, 49,933 admissions were screened for SARS-CoV-2, with 3,155 (6.3%) of 49,933 testing positive. In January 2022, an asymptomatic female aged 74 years (patient A), doubly vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, was admitted to our institution. SARS-CoV-2 RAD testing on admission was negative; SARS-CoV-2 PCR on admission screening via GeneXpert-Xpert-Xpress returned a positive result on the E-gene gene target (cycle-threshold [Ct], 20.7) but a negative result on the N2 gene target. Because our institution had not encountered N-gene dropout cases among hospitalized inpatients prior to January 2022, the practice at that time was to await results of repeated SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing using a different assay (Roche cobas-6800, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) that utilized a separate set of gene targets (ORF-1a and E-gene regions). As such, the patient was not initially isolated until repreated testing revealed persistent positive results at a low Ct value for the E-gene target and repeated SARS-CoV-2 PCR using a different assay (ie, Roche cobas-6800) returned positive. The index patient was subsequently transferred to isolation. Also, 5 other patients in the shared cubicle were exposed. The fully vaccinated patient in the adjacent bed (patient B), with an exposure time of 12 hours, subsequently tested positive on day 4 after exposure (ie, day 14 of admission), with a similar pattern of N-gene dropout on testing (Fig. 1). Previously, our institution reported 2 cases of N-gene dropout arising from a point mutation in G29195T; however, these cases were submitted from an outpatient ambulatory clinic in October 2021 and did not overlap with this cluster of cases in space or time.
Fig. 1.

Nosocomial transmission arising from a case of N-gene diagnostic escape.

Nosocomial transmission arising from a case of N-gene diagnostic escape. The nasopharyngeal swab samples of patient A and patient B were subjected to whole-genome sequence analysis. A point mutation, C29200T, was detected in the consensus sequences of both samples. G29200T is a synonymous mutation that was previously reported to cause N-gene detection failure. Whole-genome similarity analysis was performed using previously published workflows utilizing the ARTIC protocol on Oxford Nanopore minION sequencers. The SARS-CoV-2 genomes from patient A and patient B were identical (0 SNP difference). The identical genomes and epidemiological link support the hypothesis of nosocomial transmission. No additional cases of N-gene dropout were detected amongst inpatients or healthcare workers (HCWs) despite intensive surveillance including weekly, rostered, routine testing. This result is likely due to enhanced infection prevention measures in-place during the study period, including universal N95 usage by HCWs and high vaccination-uptake rates (≥80%) among inpatients and HCWs. The potential of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission from cases of N-gene dropout is not purely theoretical. Clinicians and diagnostic laboratories need to be vigilant for such cases because emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants with the potential to escape existing diagnostic tests remains inevitable. Test interpretation is critical. According to the manufacturer instructions for the Cepheid GeneXpert-Xpert-Xpress test kit, cases with discrepant results (negative on the N2-gene gene target but positive on the E-gene gene-target) should have been reported as presumptive positive with a recommendation for repeated testing. Had this interpretation been used, the patient would have been isolated upon admission and the additional period of transmission risk would not have occurred, despite the N-gene dropout. SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assays should ideally be based on ≥2 gene targets, and healthcare institutions need to maintain a robust molecular surveillance system to detect emergent diagnostic escapes. Reliable diagnostic detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for containment of COVID-19 and prevention of spread within healthcare facilities.
  9 in total

1.  Linking sporadic hospital clusters during a community surge of the severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.617.2 delta variant: The utility of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Liang En Wee; Karrie Kwan-Ki Ko; Edwin Philip Conceicao; Jean Xiang-Ying Sim; Nurdyana Abdul Rahman; Shireen Yan-Ling Tan; Delphine Yan-Hong Cao; Kenneth Xing-Long Chan; May Kyawt Aung; Myat Oo Aung; Yang Yong; Shalvi Arora; Molly Kue Bien How; Kwee Yuen Tan; Lai Chee Lee; Thuan Tong Tan; Limin Wijaya; James Heng Chiak Sim; Chayaporn Suphavilai; Indumathi Venkatachalam; Moi Lin Ling
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Use of Serial Testing to Interrupt a SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak on a Hospital Medical Floor - Minnesota, October-December 2020.

Authors:  Rajesh M Prabhu; Melanie J Firestone; Kari Bergman; Amanda Beaudoin; Tammy Hale; Alexandra Lorentz; Jacob Garfin; Xiong Wang; Stacy Holzbauer
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  A Novel Point Mutation in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 May Affect the Detection of the Virus by Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Mohammad Rubayet Hasan; Sathyavathi Sundararaju; Chidambaram Manickam; Faheem Mirza; Hamad Al-Hail; Stephan Lorenz; Patrick Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  SARS-CoV-2 N Gene G29195T Point Mutation May Affect Diagnostic Reverse Transcription-PCR Detection.

Authors:  Karrie K K Ko; Nurdyana Binte Abdul Rahman; Shireen Yan Ling Tan; Kenneth X L Chan; Sui Sin Goh; James Heng Chiak Sim; Kun Lee Lim; Wan Loo Tan; Kian Sing Chan; Lynette L E Oon; Niranjan Nagarajan; Chayaporn Suphavilai
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-01-12

5.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Variants on the Analytical Sensitivity of rRT-PCR Assays.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Yanxi Han; Jing Yang; Yu Ma; Jinming Li; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 11.677

6.  Enhanced Infection Prevention Measures Including Universal N95 Usage and Daily Testing: The Impact on SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Cohorted Hospital Cubicles Through Successive Delta and Omicron Waves.

Authors:  Liang En Wee; Karrie Kwan Ki Ko; Edwin Philip Conceicao; May Kyawt Aung; Myat Oo Aung; Yong Yang; Shalvi Arora; Indumathi Venkatachalam
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 20.999

7.  Rostered routine testing for healthcare workers and universal inpatient screening: the role of expanded hospital surveillance during an outbreak of COVID-19 in the surrounding community.

Authors:  Liang En Wee; Edwin Philip Conceicao; May Kyawt Aung; Aung Myat Oo; Yang Yong; Indumathi Venkatachalam; Jean Xiang-Ying Sim
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  SARS-CoV-2 samples may escape detection because of a single point mutation in the N gene.

Authors:  Katharina Ziegler; Philipp Steininger; Renate Ziegler; Jörg Steinmann; Klaus Korn; Armin Ensser
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.