| Literature DB >> 35774463 |
Jianqing Wang1,2, Yunyan Tan1,2, Yajun Shao1,2, Xiuzhen Shi1,2, Guoyou Zhang3,4.
Abstract
The atmospheric ozone concentrations have substantially increased in the surface layer over the past decades, and consequently exhibited a strong influence on soil microbial communities and functions. However, the effect of elevated ozone (eO3) on the abundance, diversity, and structural complexity of soil nematode communities are elusive under different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Here, the soil nematode community was investigated in two rice cultivars (Hybrid, Shanyou 63 vs. Japonica, Wuyujing 3) under open-top chambers (OTC) with control and eO3 conditions. The results showed that the abundance of soil nematode community was altered by eO3, but the responses were dependent on crop cultivars. The eO3 decreased the total abundance and simplified the network complexity of the soil nematode community for both cultivars. However, eO3 increased the abundance of c-p 4 in Shanyou 63, rather than Wuyujing 3, indicating that the hybrid rice cultivar could tradeoff the adverse impacts of eO3 on the functional group of soil nematodes. Similarly, bacterivores belonging to K-strategy (c-p 4) increased under eO3 in Shanyou 63, suggesting that the soil food web formed a bacteria-dominated channel under eO3 for the hybrid rice cultivar. This study shed new light on the critical importance of rice cultivars in shaping the impacts of eO3 on the soil micro-food web. Therefore, breeding and biotechnological approaches may become valuable pathways to improve soil health by shaping the community structures of the soil micro-food web in response to climate change in the future.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; elevated ozone; paddy soil; rice varieties; soil fauna; soil food web; soil health
Year: 2022 PMID: 35774463 PMCID: PMC9238508 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.916875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Changes in soil variables under elevated ozone conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Shanyou 63 | CK | 7.39 ± 0.06 | 66.98 ± 13.89a | 18.87 ± 5.90a | 515.06 ± 121.92 | 89.52 ± 24.65a | 41.64 ± 24.57 | 20.35 ± 5.02 |
| eO3 | 7.40 ± 0.07 | 53.64 ± 6.41ab | 12.17 ± 0.45ab | 619.69 ± 49.16 | 53.58 ± 12.14b | 53.79 ± 26.83 | 18.28 ± 3.64 | |
| Wuyujing 3 | CK | 7.35 ± 0.05 | 59.15 ± 6.09ab | 14.18 ± 4.07ab | 657.05 ± 93.39 | 49.32 ± 8.52b | 39.68 ± 11.00 | 16.93 ± 2.34 |
| eO3 | 7.37 ± 0.06 | 50.36 ± 1.69b | 7.44 ± 5.40b | 561.22 ± 48.65 | 59.99 ± 8.27b | 58.80 ± 10.61 | 21.93 ± 1.49 | |
| O3 effect# | 0.20 | -17.54 | -40.66 | 0.75 | -18.20 | 38.46 | 7.83 | |
| Cultivar effect* | -0.47 | -9.21 | -30.37 | 7.36 | -23.60 | 3.19 | 0.59 | |
| O3 | 0.891 | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.930 | 0.182 | 0.207 | 0.479 | |
| Cultivar | 0.446 | 0.279 | 0.107 | 0.415 | 0.086 | 0.897 | 0.954 | |
| O3×Cultivar | 0.420 | 0.648 | 0.993 | 0.073 | 0.027 | 0.767 | 0.109 |
Notes: #, main effects of elevated O.
Changes in the abundance of soil nematodes (individuals per 100 g dry soil) under elevated ozone conditions.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total | 123.22 ± 19.49 | 93.04 ± 26.74 | 122.24 ± 36.98 | 82.83 ± 18.24 | 0.224 | 1.81 |
| Trophic groups | ||||||
| BF | 26.28 ± 4.52 | 26.74 ± 16.17 | 17.5 ± 8.26 | 14.07 ± 11.68 | 0.443 | 0.99 |
| FF | 13.73 ± 6.10 | 7.45 ± 8.09 | 7.16 ± 1.99 | 4.71 ± 5.01 | 0.274 | 1.55 |
| PF | 72.13 ± 17.59 | 50.19 ± 17.69 | 89.06 ± 29.75 | 53.90 ± 37.76 | 0.320 | 1.37 |
| OP | 11.09 ± 5.63 | 8.66 ± 4.55 | 8.52 ± 5.63 | 10.15 ± 6.67 | 0.932 | 0.14 |
| Functional groups | ||||||
| BF1 | 10.96 ± 6.92 | 3.51 ± 2.70 | 4.94 ± 5.12 | 5.74 ± 5.49 | 0.392 | 1.13 |
| BF2 | 10.95 ± 5.79 | 7.30 ± 6.70 | 5.84 ± 2.83 | 6.25 ± 6.58 | 0.692 | 0.50 |
| BF3 | 3.48 ± 1.90 | 3.36 ± 4.08 | 4.48 ± 0.79 | 1.85 ± 1.23 | 0.613 | 0.63 |
| BF4 | 0.89 ± 1.55 | 12.56 ± 8.37 | 2.24 ± 0.77 | 0.23 ± 0.39 | 0.024 | 5.49 |
| FF2 | 13.73 ± 6.84 | 7.45 ± 5.87 | 6.27 ± 0.76 | 3.91 ± 4.36 | 0.180 | 2.09 |
| FF3 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.89 ± 1.54 | 0.80 ± 0.87 | 0.474 | 0.92 |
| PF2 | 25.79 ± 18.57 | 12.68 ± 2.39 | 10.77 ± 2.40 | 7.39 ± 7.33 | 0.208 | 1.90 |
| PF3 | 45.63 ± 7.08 | 37.51 ± 17.38 | 77.85 ± 30.87 | 45.94 ± 36.09 | 0.295 | 1.47 |
| PF4 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.44 ± 0.77 | 0 ± 0 | 0.441 | 1.00 |
| PF5 | 0.70 ± 1.22 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.57 ± 0.99 | 0.592 | 0.67 |
| OP3 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0.44 ± 0.77 | 0 ± 0 | 0.441 | 1.00 |
| OP4 | 2.30 ± 2.14 | 1.61 ± 1.41 | 0.45 ± 0.78 | 0 ± 0 | 0.215 | 1.86 |
| OP5 | 8.79 ± 3.57 | 7.06 ± 3.26 | 7.63 ± 5.12 | 10.15 ± 6.67 | 0.867 | 0.24 |
Note: TN, total nematodes; BF, bacterivores; FF, fungivores; PF, herbivores; OP, omnivores-predators.
Figure 1Non-multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of the nematode community under elevated ozone.
Figure 2The complexity and interactions of soil nematode community under elevated ozone. The connections represented strong (R2 > 0.6) and significant (P < 0.05) correlations. The size of each node was proportional to the number of connections (degrees). Red lines represented significantly positive and purple lines represent significantly negative correlations. Different colors of nodes represented nematode trophic groups.
Figure 3Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationships between soil properties and soil nematode community under elevated ozone.
Figure 4Correlations between soil properties, grain yield and soil nematode community under elevated ozone. DOC, dissolved organic carbon; DON, dissolved organic nitrogen; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen; TN, total nematodes; BF, bacterivores; FF, fungivores; PF, plant parasites; OP, omnivorous-predatory; H′, Shannon-Wiener diversity index. * The asterisk represents a significant correlation at the 0.05 probability level.
Figure 5Structural equation models (SEM) analysis of elevated ozone and rice cultivars on soil nematodes. The results of the model fitting: Chi-square (χ2) = 4.635, P = 0.704, df = 7, CFI (comparative fit index) = 1, RMSEA (root square mean error of approximation) < 0.001. Red and purple arrows showed positive and negative effects, while solid arrows and dashed arrows showed the directions and effects that were significant (P < 0.05) and non-significant (P > 0.05), respectively.