| Literature DB >> 35774395 |
Sang Hoon Lee1, Han-Ki Park2, Chang Don Kang1, Dae Hee Choi1, Sung Chul Park1, Jin Myung Park1, Seung-Joo Nam1, Gi Bong Chae3, Kyoung Yul Lee4, Hyunseok Cho5, Sung Joon Lee1.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Current therapeutic strategies for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI), including oral vancomycin, metronidazole and fecal microbial transplantation, have limited efficacy and treatment failure may occur in as many as one- third of cases. Recent studies have reported that lower concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are associated with CDI severity and recurrence. However, there have been no studies on microbiota composition after the administration of vitamin D in patients with CDI. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the microbiota composition between the two groups, including eight CDI-positive patients with vitamin D supplementation and ten CDI-positive patients without vitamin D supplementation by using 16S rRNA microbial profiling.Entities:
Keywords: bifidobacteriaceae; cholecalciferol; christensenellaceae; clostridioides difficile infection; microbiota; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35774395 PMCID: PMC9239168 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.904987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1Schematic diagram showing the recruitment process.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study population (N=18).
| Control (n = 10) | Experiment (n = 8) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 76.9 ± 13.3 | 71.5 ± 21.9 | 0.573 |
|
| 5 vs 5 | 4 vs 4 | 1 |
|
| 20.9 ± 2.9 | 20.4 ± 4.6 | 0.46 |
|
| 5(50) | 4(50) | 1 |
|
| 2(20) | 2(25) | 1 |
|
| 2(20) | 0(0) | 0.477 |
|
| 1(10) | 0(0) | 1 |
|
| 3(30) | 0(0) | 0.216 |
|
| 2(20) | 1(12.5) | 1 |
|
| 17260 ± 11931 | 11675 ± 4062 | 0.36 |
|
| 82.3 ± 9.0 | 74.2 ± 12.7 | 0.146 |
|
| 11.5 ± 1.5 | 11.1 ± 1.6 | 0.633 |
|
| 211 ± 116 | 289 ± 104 | 0.237 |
|
| 17.7 ± 32.6 | 45.2 ± 17.5 | 0.065 |
|
| 9.9 ± 6.5 | 9.0 ± 6.0 | 0.965 |
|
| 34.1 ± 34.4 | 12.8 ± 5.6 | 0.016 |
|
| 1.5 ± 1.3 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.173 |
|
| 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.762 |
|
| 3.2 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.829 |
|
| 10.1 ± 3.8 | 9.8 ± 4.4 | 0.897 |
BMI, body mass index; WBC, white blood cell count; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
Figure 2Changes in the gut microbiota between Clostridioides difficile infection and recovery after eight weeks. (A) Alpha diversity. (B) Weighted UniFrac distance. (C) Relative abundances of individual bacteria that were significantly different between Clostridioides difficile infection and recovery. Blue dots indicate C. difficile infection state (0 week), red dots indicate recovery after eight weeks, and black lines represent changes in the same patient. n.s, not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 3Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the gut microbiome. (A) Alpha diversity. (B) Weighted UniFrac distance. (C) Principal coordinates analysis (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity). (D) Relative abundances of Proteobacteria. (E) Relative abundances of Enterobacteriaceae. (F) Relative abundances of Escherichia. (G) Relative abundances of Christensenellaceae. n.s, not significant; *P < 0.05 (Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 4Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the individual gut taxa. A, B. Cladogram (A) and linear discriminant analysis scores (B) using LEfSe analysis of the fecal microbiota in Clostridioides difficile infection versus recovery after eight weeks in the vitamin D treatment group. (C–G). Differences in the abundance of individual bacteria between the control group and vitamin (D) supplement group. (C) Proteobacteria. (D) Lachnospiraceae. (E) Ruminococcaceae. (F) Bifidobacteriaceae. (G) Christensenellaceae. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (Wilcoxon signed rank test).