Literature DB >> 35771263

Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models facilitates differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions.

Hao-Lin Yin1, Yu Jiang2, Zihan Xu3, Hui-Hui Jia1, Guang-Wu Lin4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of the combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4 (BI-RADS 4) lesions and to evaluate whether the combined diagnosis of these models could improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists.
METHODS: A total of 319 female patients with 319 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets in this retrospective study. The three models were established based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2-weighted imaging using the training and validation sets. The artificial intelligence (AI) combination score was calculated according to the results of three models. The diagnostic performances of four radiologists with and without AI assistance were compared with the AI combination score on the testing set. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and weighted kappa value were calculated to assess the performance.
RESULTS: The AI combination score yielded an excellent performance (AUC = 0.944) on the testing set. With AI assistance, the AUC for the diagnosis of junior radiologist 1 (JR1) increased from 0.833 to 0.885, and that for JR2 increased from 0.823 to 0.876. The AUCs of senior radiologist 1 (SR1) and SR2 slightly increased from 0.901 and 0.950 to 0.925 and 0.975 after AI assistance, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Combined diagnosis of multiparametric MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate TNBC from fibroadenoma magnetic resonance BI-RADS 4 lesions can achieve comparable performance to that of SRs and improve the diagnostic performance of JRs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; Breast cancer; Deep learning; Neural network; Triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2022        PMID: 35771263     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04142-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  28 in total

1.  Breast mass classification in sonography with transfer learning using a deep convolutional neural network and color conversion.

Authors:  Michal Byra; Michael Galperin; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Linda Olson; Mary O'Boyle; Christopher Comstock; Michael Andre
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Association between sonographic appearances of breast cancers and their histopathologic features and biomarkers.

Authors:  Melania Costantini; Paolo Belli; Enida Bufi; Anna Maria Asunis; Enrico Ferra; Grazia Tomasa Bitti
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 3.  Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  B E Dogan; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Farrah Kassam; Katherine Enright; Rebecca Dent; George Dranitsaris; Jeff Myers; Candi Flynn; Michael Fralick; Ritu Kumar; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  An overview of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar; Rupali Aggarwal
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Diffusion-weighted Imaging Allows for Downgrading MR BI-RADS 4 Lesions in Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast to Avoid Unnecessary Biopsy.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Barbara Krug; Hubert Bickel; Matthias Dietzel; Katja Pinker; Victor-Frederic Neuhaus; Maria Adele Marino; Marco Moschetta; Nicoletta Troiano; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Development and validation of prognostic model for predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qi Mei; Amanda Y Wang; Amy Bryant; Yang Yang; Ming Li; Fei Wang; Jia Wei Zhao; Ke Ma; Liang Wu; Huawen Chen; Jinlong Luo; Shangming Du; Kathrin Halfter; Yong Li; Christian Kurts; Guangyuan Hu; Xianglin Yuan; Jian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Clinical application of S-Detect to breast masses on ultrasonography: a study evaluating the diagnostic performance and agreement with a dedicated breast radiologist.

Authors:  Kiwook Kim; Mi Kyung Song; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-04-14

9.  Application of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound interpretation: improvements in diagnostic performance according to reader experience.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Choi; Bong Joo Kang; Ji Eun Baek; Hyun Sil Lee; Sung Hun Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-08-14

10.  Radiomics of US texture features in differential diagnosis between triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Jin Young Kwak; Eunjung Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.