Literature DB >> 23012298

Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer.

B E Dogan1, L W Turnbull.   

Abstract

Although triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been studied extensively in the oncology and pathology literature, there are few reports on imaging features. Emerging data suggest that imaging features of TNBC are substantially different from other primary breast cancer immunotypes. In this work, we reviewed multi-modality imaging features of primary TNBC with emphasis on the appropriate niche for each technology in diagnosis, staging and management. TNBC lacks the typical suspicious mammographic features of breast cancer; namely irregular mass shape, spiculated margins and associated suspicious calcifications. Therefore, mammography alone is usually a sub-optimal tool for its initial diagnostic evaluation. Ultrasound has a much higher sensitivity, although its diagnostic capability may be impaired by associated benign features encountered in 21%-41% of TNBC lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consistently demonstrates the presence of all TNBC with a higher level of accuracy compared with other tumour sub-types, and provides a reliable baseline for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) follow-up. Preliminary studies also suggest that MRI may predict complete NAC response in TNBC more sensitively than other methods. [(18)F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) has a higher sensitivity for TNBC than estrogen-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours, and axillary lymph node metastases are detected with more accuracy compared with other tumour molecular sub-types, although low FDG uptake of breast cancers in general may limit the routine clinical use of (18)F-FDG-PET in the initial diagnosis of TNBC patients and NAC follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23012298     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  37 in total

1.  Targeted Imaging of the Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3 (ACKR3/CXCR7) in Human Cancer Xenografts.

Authors:  Babak Behnam Azad; Ala Lisok; Samit Chatterjee; John T Poirier; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Gary D Luker; Martin G Pomper; Sridhar Nimmagadda
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Mismatch between perfusion and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Anna Rita Cervino
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Julie Weiss; Rebecca A Hubbard; Cristina O'Donoghue; Wendy B DeMartini; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha Goodrich; Beth Virnig; Anna N A Tosteson; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of the breast in a patient with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Stephen Vong; Shannon Marisa Navarro; Morgan Darrow; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-31

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging is helpful in the accurate non-invasive diagnosis of breast abscess: correlation with necrotic breast cancer.

Authors:  Cuiyan Wang; Mohammad Eghtedari; Wei Tse Yang; Basak Erguvan Dogan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-22

6.  ImmunoPET of tissue factor expression in triple-negative breast cancer with a radiolabeled antibody Fab fragment.

Authors:  Sixiang Shi; Hao Hong; Hakan Orbay; Stephen A Graves; Yunan Yang; Jakob D Ohman; Bai Liu; Robert J Nickles; Hing C Wong; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Organized screening detects breast cancer at earlier stage regardless of molecular phenotype.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Li Jiang; Marlo Whitehead; Jennifer M Racz; Patti A Groome
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Elastographic features of triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Martina Džoić Dominković; Gordana Ivanac; Tomislav Kelava; Boris Brkljačić
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Distinguishing metastatic triple-negative breast cancer from nonmetastatic breast cancer using second harmonic generation imaging and resonance Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ethan Bendau; Jason Smith; Lin Zhang; Ellen Ackerstaff; Natalia Kruchevsky; Binlin Wu; Jason A Koutcher; Robert Alfano; Lingyan Shi
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 10.  Imaging Features of Triple Negative Breast Cancer and the Effect of BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Niloofar Karbasian; Sahand Sohrabi; Toma S Omofoye; Huong Le-Petross; Banu K Arun; Constance T Albarracin; Kenneth R Hess; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2020-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.