Literature DB >> 35769614

CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of SlCMT4 causes changes in plant architecture and reproductive organs in tomato.

Xuhu Guo1,2, Jianguo Zhao3, Zhiwen Chen3, Jun Qiao3, Yongfang Zhang1, Hong Shen1, Zhongli Hu4.   

Abstract

DNA methylation participates widely in the regulation of gene expression in plants. To date, the regulation and function of DNA methylation is still unknown in tomato plants. Here, we generated SlCMT4 mutants using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system. We observed severe developmental defects in CRISPR-Cas9-mediated SlCMT4 mutants, including small and thick leaves, increased lateral buds, defective stamens and pistils, small fruit size with reduced setting rate, and defective seed development. The alterations at hormonal levels (IAA, tZR, strigol) were consistent with the multibranching phenotype in SlCMT4 mutant plants. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout of SlCMT4 induced the expression of two pollen-specific genes (PMEI and PRALF) that suppressed the development of pollen wall and pollen tube elongation, which is responsible for irregular and defective pollen. The small-sized fruit phenotype is probably associated with upregulated expression of the IMA gene and reduced seeds in the mutant lines. Furthermore, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of fruits and found that SlCMT4 knockout reduced genome-wide cytosine methylation. A reduction of methylation was also observed in a 2-kp region of the IMA and LOXB promoters in the SlCMT4-mutant fruits, indicating that the hypermethylation status of the CHH context is critical for the inhibition of IMA and LOXB promoter activity. Our results show that SlCMT4 is required for normal development of tomato vegetative and reproductive organs. This study illuminates the function of SlCMT4 and sheds light on the molecular regulatory mechanism of tomato plant architecture and fruit development and ripening.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nanjing Agricultural University.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35769614      PMCID: PMC9233168          DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hortic Res        ISSN: 2052-7276            Impact factor:   7.291


  46 in total

1.  Inactivation of a DNA methylation pathway in maize reproductive organs results in apomixis-like phenotypes.

Authors:  Marcelina Garcia-Aguilar; Caroline Michaud; Olivier Leblanc; Daniel Grimanelli
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Developmental abnormalities and epimutations associated with DNA hypomethylation mutations.

Authors:  T Kakutani; J A Jeddeloh; S K Flowers; K Munakata; E J Richards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DMRcaller: a versatile R/Bioconductor package for detection and visualization of differentially methylated regions in CpG and non-CpG contexts.

Authors:  Marco Catoni; Jonathan Mf Tsang; Alessandro P Greco; Nicolae Radu Zabet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Arabidopsis cmt3 chromomethylase mutations block non-CG methylation and silencing of an endogenous gene.

Authors:  L Bartee; F Malagnac; J Bender
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants.

Authors:  Peter J A Cock; Christopher J Fields; Naohisa Goto; Michael L Heuer; Peter M Rice
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias.

Authors:  Matthew D Young; Matthew J Wakefield; Gordon K Smyth; Alicia Oshlack
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation mutants.

Authors:  A Vongs; T Kakutani; R A Martienssen; E J Richards
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences.

Authors:  Ryan Lister; Mattia Pelizzola; Robert H Dowen; R David Hawkins; Gary Hon; Julian Tonti-Filippini; Joseph R Nery; Leonard Lee; Zhen Ye; Que-Minh Ngo; Lee Edsall; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Ron Stewart; Victor Ruotti; A Harvey Millar; James A Thomson; Bing Ren; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Altered cell wall disassembly during ripening of Cnr tomato fruit: implications for cell adhesion and fruit softening.

Authors:  Caroline Orfila; Miranda M H Huisman; William G T Willats; Gert-Jan W M van Alebeek; Henk A Schols; Graham B Seymour; J Paul Knox
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Silencing of the major salt-dependent isoform of pectinesterase in tomato alters fruit softening.

Authors:  Thanh D Phan; Wen Bo; Gill West; Grantley W Lycett; Gregory A Tucker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.