Jiwoong Jason Jeong1, Bhavik Patel2, Imon Banerjee1,2. 1. Arizona State University, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Tempe, Arizona, United States. 2. Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Arizona, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, the development and exploration of deeper and more complex deep learning models has been on the rise. However, the availability of large heterogeneous datasets to support efficient training of deep learning models is lacking. While linear image transformations for augmentation have been used traditionally, the recent development of generative adversarial networks (GANs) could theoretically allow us to generate an infinite amount of data from the real distribution to support deep learning model training. Recently, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) curated a multiclass hemorrhage detection challenge dataset that includes over 800,000 images for hemorrhage detection, but all high-performing models were trained using traditional data augmentation techniques. Given a wide variety of selections, the augmentation for image classification often follows a trial-and-error policy. Approach: We designed conditional DCGAN (cDCGAN) and in parallel trained multiple popular GAN models to use as online augmentations and compared them to traditional augmentation methods for the hemorrhage case study. Results: Our experimentations show that the super-minority, epidural hemorrhages with cDCGAN augmentation presented a minimum of 2 × improvement in their performance against the traditionally augmented model using the same classifier configuration. Conclusion: This shows that for complex and imbalanced datasets, traditional data imbalancing solutions may not be sufficient and require more complex and diverse data augmentation methods such as GANs to solve.
Purpose: In recent years, the development and exploration of deeper and more complex deep learning models has been on the rise. However, the availability of large heterogeneous datasets to support efficient training of deep learning models is lacking. While linear image transformations for augmentation have been used traditionally, the recent development of generative adversarial networks (GANs) could theoretically allow us to generate an infinite amount of data from the real distribution to support deep learning model training. Recently, the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) curated a multiclass hemorrhage detection challenge dataset that includes over 800,000 images for hemorrhage detection, but all high-performing models were trained using traditional data augmentation techniques. Given a wide variety of selections, the augmentation for image classification often follows a trial-and-error policy. Approach: We designed conditional DCGAN (cDCGAN) and in parallel trained multiple popular GAN models to use as online augmentations and compared them to traditional augmentation methods for the hemorrhage case study. Results: Our experimentations show that the super-minority, epidural hemorrhages with cDCGAN augmentation presented a minimum of 2 × improvement in their performance against the traditionally augmented model using the same classifier configuration. Conclusion: This shows that for complex and imbalanced datasets, traditional data imbalancing solutions may not be sufficient and require more complex and diverse data augmentation methods such as GANs to solve.
Authors: Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: William K Erly; William G Berger; Elizabeth Krupinski; Joachim F Seeger; John A Guisto Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Charlotte Jj van Asch; Merel Ja Luitse; Gabriël Je Rinkel; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ale Algra; Catharina Jm Klijn Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Vilaas S Shetty; Martin N Reis; Joseph M Aulino; Kevin L Berger; Joshua Broder; Asim F Choudhri; A Tuba Kendi; Marcus M Kessler; Claudia F Kirsch; Michael D Luttrull; Laszlo L Mechtler; J Adair Prall; Patricia B Raksin; Christopher J Roth; Aseem Sharma; O Clark West; Max Wintermark; Rebecca S Cornelius; Julie Bykowski Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Martin J Willemink; Wojciech A Koszek; Cailin Hardell; Jie Wu; Dominik Fleischmann; Hugh Harvey; Les R Folio; Ronald M Summers; Daniel L Rubin; Matthew P Lungren Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 11.105