Literature DB >> 35768696

Flow Diverting Stents in Cerebral Small Caliber Vessels (< 2 mm) for Aneurysm Treatment : A Three Center Retrospective Study.

Sophia Hohenstatt1, Sergio L Vinci2, Dominik F Vollherbst1, Agostino Tessitore3, Niclas Schmitt1, Antonio Pitrone4, Antonio A Caragliano4, Mariano Velo4, Markus A Möhlenbruch1, Aldo Paolucci5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The off-label use of flow diverting stents (FDS) for treating cerebral aneurysms in small distal vessels is increasing in clinical practice with encouraging results; however, data directly addressing the parent vessel size are still scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FDS placement in anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms with parent arteries ≤ 2 mm in a real-world representative setting.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with FDS at the three participating university hospitals between 2009 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were the placement of at least one FDS in a parent vessel with a maximum diameter of 2 mm or less. The primary clinical safety endpoint was the absence of death, major or minor symptomatic stroke, transient ischemic attack and procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the follow-up visit at 1 year. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as complete and near-complete occlusion at the 1‑year follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 55 patients harboring 56 aneurysms. The primary clinical safety endpoint was obtained in 93% of cases. The hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complication rates were 4% and 9%, respectively. No patient died or had a relevant discrepancy (> 1 point) at the pre-mRS and post-mRS. The primary efficacy endpoint was reached in 80% of cases.
CONCLUSION: The use of FDS in vessels < 2 mm is technically feasible with good aneurysm occlusion rates and an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, it is essential to be aware of the of the main complications associated when operating in small diameter vessels.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysms; Distal vasculature; Neurointervention; Small vessel; Stroke

Year:  2022        PMID: 35768696     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01187-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  26 in total

1.  A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents.

Authors:  C J O'kelly; T Krings; D Fiorella; T R Marotta
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Flow-diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xianli Lv; Hongchao Yang; Peng Liu; Youxiang Li
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-02-02

Review 3.  Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Mariano Marseglia; Giuseppe Mariniello; Ferdinando Caranci; Arturo Brunetti; Francesco Maiuri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-08-27

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuwen Sun; Yuping Li; Xiaodong Wang; Guangyu Lu; Lei She; Zhengcun Yan; Hengzhu Zhang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial.

Authors:  Tibor Becske; Waleed Brinjikji; Matthew B Potts; David F Kallmes; Maksim Shapiro; Christopher J Moran; Elad I Levy; Cameron G McDougall; István Szikora; Giuseppe Lanzino; Henry H Woo; Demetrius K Lopes; Adnan H Siddiqui; Felipe C Albuquerque; David J Fiorella; Isil Saatci; Saruhan H Cekirge; Aaron L Berez; Daniel J Cher; Zsolt Berentei; Miklós Marosfoi; Peter K Nelson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Arrese; Rosario Sarabia; Rebeca Pintado; Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  FRED Italian Registry: a multicenter experience with the flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Mariangela Piano; Luca Valvassori; Emilio Lozupone; Guglielmo Pero; Luca Quilici; Edoardo Boccardi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Long-term safety and efficacy of distal aneurysm treatment with flow diversion in the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery and beyond.

Authors:  Petra Cimflova; Enes Özlük; Bora Korkmazer; Ramiz Ahmadov; Elif Akpek; Osman Kizilkilic; Civan Islak; Naci Kocer
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 9.  Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with Pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results.

Authors:  Guilherme Dabus; Jonathan A Grossberg; C Michael Cawley; Jacques E Dion; Ajit S Puri; Ajay K Wakhloo; Douglas Gonsales; Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Eric Sauvageau; Italo Linfante; Ricardo A Hanel
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results of the dual-layer flow diverter device (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hasan Dinc; Isil Saatci; Sukru Oguz; Feyyaz Baltacioglu; Altan Yildiz; Halil Donmez; Umit Belet; Baran Onal; Cagatay Andic; Osman Koc; Omer Kocak; Mert Koroglu; Mustafa Cetin; H Saruhan Cekirge
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.