Literature DB >> 33392735

Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results of the dual-layer flow diverter device (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a multicenter study.

Hasan Dinc1, Isil Saatci2, Sukru Oguz1, Feyyaz Baltacioglu3, Altan Yildiz4, Halil Donmez5, Umit Belet6, Baran Onal7, Cagatay Andic8, Osman Koc9, Omer Kocak10, Mert Koroglu11, Mustafa Cetin12, H Saruhan Cekirge13.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) in this multicenter study with prospective design. MATERIALS-
METHOD: This study included 136 consecutive patients with 155 aneurysms treated between March 2013 and June 2016 in 10 centers. Twenty-two (16.2%) patients presented with rupture of the index aneurysm. Large/giant aneurysms comprised 1/3 of the cohort. Adjuvant coil use during the treatment was 15.5%. The effectiveness measure in the study was the percentage of aneurysms with stable occlusion at follow-up.
RESULTS: Vascular imaging follow-up was performed at least once in 131/136 (96.3%) patients with 148/155 (95.5%) aneurysms up to 75 months (mean: 37.3 months; median: 36 months according to latest follow-up), and 102/155(65.8%) aneurysms in 90/136 (66.2%) patients had ≥ 24-month control. According to the latest controls, the overall stable occlusion rate was 91.9% (95% CI, 87.5 to 96.3%). Three out of 148 aneurysms with follow-up were retreated (2%, 95% CI 0.0 to 4.3%). Adverse events were noted in 19/136 (14%, 95% CI, 9 to 21%) patients with a morbidity of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.0 to 3.5%). Mortality was 1/136 (0.7%, 95% CI, 0.02 to 2.2%) and was unrelated to aneurysm treatment. In-stent stenosis (ISS) was detected in 10/131 of the patients with follow-up (7.6%, 95% CI; 3.1 to 12.2%), only one being symptomatic. No adverse events have occurred in any of the patients with follow-up after 24 months, except the one resulting from ISS.
CONCLUSION: In the treatment of cerebral aneurysms which were candidates for flow diversion technique, this study showed long-term efficacy of FRED with good safety and occlusion rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysm; Endovascular treatment; Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal device = FRED; Flow diversion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392735     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02627-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

1.  The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy.

Authors:  M A Möhlenbruch; C Herweh; L Jestaedt; S Stampfl; S Schönenberger; P A Ringleb; M Bendszus; M Pham
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Initial Experience with p64: A Novel Mechanically Detachable Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Intracranial Saccular Sidewall Aneurysms.

Authors:  S Fischer; M Aguilar-Pérez; E Henkes; W Kurre; O Ganslandt; H Bäzner; H Henkes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Safety and efficacy of flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a single center experience.

Authors:  Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Lorenzo Ugga; Mariano Marseglia; Domenico Solari; Ferdinando Caranci; Giuseppe Mariniello; Francesco Maiuri; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 4.  Off-label uses of the Pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Purvee D Patel; Nohra Chalouhi; Elias Atallah; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; David Hasan; Hekmat Zarzour; Robert Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Endothelialization following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  K Ravindran; M M Salem; A Y Alturki; A J Thomas; C S Ogilvy; J M Moore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  I Saatci; K Yavuz; C Ozer; S Geyik; H S Cekirge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Tibor Becske; David F Kallmes; Isil Saatci; Cameron G McDougall; István Szikora; Giuseppe Lanzino; Christopher J Moran; Henry H Woo; Demetrius K Lopes; Aaron L Berez; Daniel J Cher; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; Felipe C Albuquerque; David J Fiorella; Zsolt Berentei; Miklós Marosfoi; Saruhan H Cekirge; Peter K Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  K Yavuz; S Geyik; I Saatci; H S Cekirge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: Trials Involving Flow Diverters and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Bree Chancellor; Eytan Raz; Maksim Shapiro; Omar Tanweer; Erez Nossek; Howard A Riina; Peter Kim Nelson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter.

Authors:  Ramanathan Kadirvel; Yong-Hong Ding; Daying Dai; Issa Rezek; Debra A Lewis; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Flow Diverting Stents in Cerebral Small Caliber Vessels (< 2 mm) for Aneurysm Treatment : A Three Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sophia Hohenstatt; Sergio L Vinci; Dominik F Vollherbst; Agostino Tessitore; Niclas Schmitt; Antonio Pitrone; Antonio A Caragliano; Mariano Velo; Markus A Möhlenbruch; Aldo Paolucci
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Brazilian FRED Registry: A Prospective Multicenter Study for Brain Aneurysm Treatment-The BRED Study.

Authors:  L B Manzato; R B Santos; P M M Filho; G Miotto; A M Bastos; J R Vanzin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.966

3.  Long-term results and comparison of flow re-direction endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device in endovascular treatment of intracranial carotid aneurysms.

Authors:  Cemal A Gündoğmuş; Soheil Sabet; Nurten A Baltacıoğlu; Derya Türeli; Yaşar Bayri; Feyyaz Baltacıoğlu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 1.764

4.  Diversion-p64: results from an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the p64 flow modulation device.

Authors:  Alain Bonafe; Marta Aguilar Perez; Hans Henkes; Pedro Lylyk; Carlos Bleise; Gregory Gascou; Stanimir Sirakov; Alexander Sirakov; Luc Stockx; Francis Turjman; Andrey Petrov; Christian Roth; Ana-Paula Narata; Xavier Barreau; Christian Loehr; Ansgar Berlis; Laurent Pierot; Marcin Miś; Tony Goddard; Andy Clifton; Joachim Klisch; Cezary Wałęsa; Massimo Dall'Olio; Laurent Spelle; Frédéric Clarencon; Sergey Yakovlev; Peter Keston; Nunzio Paolo Nuzzi; Stefanita Dima; Christina Wendl; Tine Willems; Peter Schramm
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 8.572

5.  Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Rimal H Dossani; Modhi Alkhaldi; Jocelyn Neveu; Justin M Cappuzzo; Jaims Lim; Asham Khan; Victoria Lazarov; Andre Monteiro; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.764

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.