Literature DB >> 35768676

Society of General Internal Medicine Position Statement on Social Risk and Equity in Medicare's Mandatory Value-Based Payment Programs.

Anders Chen1, Arnab Ghosh2, Kendrick B Gwynn3,4, Celeste Newby5, Tracey L Henry6, Jackson Pearce7, Marshall Fleurant6, Stacie Schmidt6, Jennifer Bracey8, Elizabeth A Jacobs9.   

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (2010) and Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (2015) ushered in a new era of Medicare value-based payment programs. Five major mandatory pay-for-performance programs have been implemented since 2012 with increasing positive and negative payment adjustments over time. A growing body of evidence indicates that these programs are inequitable and financially penalize safety-net systems and systems that care for a higher proportion of racial and ethnic minority patients. Payments from penalized systems are often redistributed to those with higher performance scores, which are predominantly better-financed, large, urban systems that serve less vulnerable patient populations - a "Reverse Robin Hood" effect. This inequity may be diminished by adjusting for social risk factors in payment policy. In this position statement, we review the literature evaluating equity across Medicare value-based payment programs, major policy reports evaluating the use of social risk data, and provide recommendations on behalf of the Society of General Internal Medicine regarding how to address social risk and unmet health-related social needs in these programs. Immediate recommendations include implementing peer grouping (stratification of healthcare systems by proportion of dual eligible Medicare/Medicaid patients served, and evaluation of performance and subsequent payment adjustments within strata) until optimal methods for accounting for social risk are defined. Short-term recommendations include using census-based, area-level indices to account for neighborhood-level social risk, and developing standardized approaches to collecting individual socioeconomic data in a robust but sensitive way. Long-term recommendations include implementing a research agenda to evaluate best practices for accounting for social risk, developing validated health equity specific measures of care, and creating policies to better integrate healthcare and social services.
© 2022. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medicare; safety-net systems; social determinants of health; value-based payment

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35768676      PMCID: PMC9485310          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07698-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  33 in total

1.  Safety-net hospitals more likely than other hospitals to fare poorly under Medicare's value-based purchasing.

Authors:  Matlin Gilman; E Kathleen Adams; Jason M Hockenberry; Arnold S Milstein; Ira B Wilson; Edmund R Becker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Developing and Validating a Measure to Estimate Poverty in Medicare Administrative Data.

Authors:  Valerie A Lewis; Karen Joynt Maddox; Andrea M Austin; Daniel J Gottlieb; Julie P W Bynum
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Variation In Health Outcomes: The Role Of Spending On Social Services, Public Health, And Health Care, 2000-09.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Maureen Canavan; Erika Rogan; Kristina Talbert-Slagle; Chima Ndumele; Lauren Taylor; Leslie A Curry
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Adjusting for social risk factors impacts performance and penalties in the hospital readmissions reduction program.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; Mat Reidhead; Jianhui Hu; Amy J H Kind; Alan M Zaslavsky; Elna M Nagasako; David R Nerenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt Maddox; Mat Reidhead; Andrew C Qi; David R Nerenz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia.

Authors:  Zachary Hermes; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Robert W Yeh; Yuansong Zhao; Changyu Shen; Rishi K Wadhera
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  The Financial Effect of Value-Based Purchasing and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program on Safety-Net Hospitals in 2014: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Matlin Gilman; Jason M Hockenberry; E Kathleen Adams; Arnold S Milstein; Ira B Wilson; Edmund R Becker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program.

Authors:  Lena M Chen; Arnold M Epstein; E John Orav; Clara E Filice; Lok Wong Samson; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Leveraging the Social Determinants of Health: What Works?

Authors:  Lauren A Taylor; Annabel Xulin Tan; Caitlin E Coyle; Chima Ndumele; Erika Rogan; Maureen Canavan; Leslie A Curry; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Society of General Internal Medicine Position Statement on the Internists' Role in Social Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Elena Byhoff; Shreya Kangovi; Seth A Berkowitz; Matthew DeCamp; Elizabeth Dzeng; Mark Earnest; Cristina M Gonzalez; Sarah Hartigan; Reena Karani; Milad Memari; Brita Roy; Mark D Schwartz; Anna Volerman; Karen DeSalvo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.