Literature DB >> 35767385

The autotetraploid potato genome provides insights into highly heterozygous species.

Fang Wang1,2,3,4, Zhiqiang Xia5,6, Meiling Zou5,6, Long Zhao1,2, Sirong Jiang5,6, Yun Zhou1,2,3,4, Chenji Zhang5,6, Yongzhen Ma1, Yuting Bao5,6, Haihong Sun1,2,3,4, Wenquan Wang6, Jian Wang1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) originated in the Andes and evolved its vegetative propagation strategy through short day-dependent tuber development. Herein, we present a high-quality, chromosome-scale reference genome sequence of a tetraploid potato cultivar. The total length of this genome assembly was 2.67 Gb, with scaffold N50 and contig N50 sizes of 46.24 and 2.19 Mb, respectively. In total, 1.69 Gb repetitive sequences were obtained through de novo annotation, and long terminal repeats were the main transposable elements. A total of 126 070 protein-coding genes were annotated, of which 125 077 (99.21%) were located on chromosomes. The 48 chromosomes were classified into four haplotypes. We annotated 31 506 homologous genes, including 5913 (18.77%) genes with four homologues, 11 103 (35.24%) with three homologues, 12 177 (38.65%) with two homologues and 2313 (7.34%) with one homologue. MLH3, MSH6/7 and RFC3, which are the genes involved in the mismatch repair pathway, were found to be significantly expanded in the tetraploid potato genome relative to the diploid potato genome. Genome-wide association analysis revealed that cytochrome P450, flavonoid synthesis, chalcone enzyme, glycosyl hydrolase and glycosyl transferase genes were significantly correlated with the flesh colours of potato tuber in 150 tetraploid potatoes. This study provides valuable insights into the highly heterozygous autotetraploid potato genome and may facilitate the development of tools for potato cultivar breeding and further studies on autotetraploid crops.
© 2022 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative genomics; genome-wide association analysis; genomics; mismatch repair; tetraploid potato

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35767385      PMCID: PMC9491450          DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   13.263


Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is amongst the four major food crops grown worldwide (Li et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2020a). Diploid to hexaploid potato varieties (2n = 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72) are found in nature, with each species being geography specific. S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum was introduced to Europe in the 15th century; however, its cultivation began only in the 17th century. Potato originated in the Andes and evolved into a short day‐dependent tuber‐forming crop, which characterizes its vegetative propagation strategy (Kloosterman et al., 2013). The flesh colour of potato tuber is usually white or yellow, whereas potatoes with purple, red, blue or black tubers are named ‘coloured potato’. Coloured potatoes contain an anti‐ageing organic component, anthocyanin, in addition to nutrients (Kyoungwon et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015). Being an essential food resource, they play a vital socioeconomic role (Stokstad, 2019). Potato belongs to the Solanaceae family, and they have been classified into different groups according to different taxonomic opinions (Spooner et al., 2014; Spooner and Hetterscheid, 2005). Based on the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, Bukasov (1971) and Lechnovich (1971) classified potatoes into 21 species, including S. tuberosum subsp. Andigenum and S. tuberosum subsp. Tuberosum. Hawkes (1990) recognized seven species of potato (Hawkes, 1990). Ochoa and Center (1990), Ochoa (1999) identified nine species of potato. Dodds (1962) classified potatoes into five species, including Stenotonum, Phureja, Chaucha, Andigena and Tuberosum, based on the International Code of Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants. Recently, potatoes were considered to have four species, namely S. tuberosum (2n = 48), S. ajanhuiri (2n = 24), S. juzepczukii (2n = 36) and S. curtilobum (2n = 60). S. tuberosum can be further divided into two subspecies, S. tuberosum ssp. andigena (2n = 48) and S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum (2n = 48; Spooner et al., 2007; Spooner et al., 2014). Potato polyploids are allopolyploids originated from diploid hybridizations, and a diploid cultivar S. stenotomum (2n = 24) is the ancestor of all potato cultivars. S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum, a long‐day autotetraploid, is a variant of the more primitive S. tuberosum ssp. andigena, with the variation and selection caused by a change from a short‐day to a long‐day environment (Hawkes, 1990). S. stenotomum and S. sparsipilum were hybridized to generate a double diploid, S. tuberosum ssp. andigena, whereas S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum is a homologous heterozygous tetraploid and the most widely cultivated potato species worldwide. Moreover, local landraces of native potatoes from the South American highlands hold great importance, particularly for small stakeholders. Several genome sequences of diploid potato cultivars identified are of great significance in potato research (Aversano et al., 2015; Leisner et al., 2018; The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2011; Zhou et al., 2020). A homozygous double haploid material, DM1‐3516 R44 (DM), was obtained from a haploid material, which was produced using the anther culture of S. phureja through chromosome doubling (Paz and Veilleux, 1999). The bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequences of a diploid hybrid material, RH89‐039‐16 (RH), containing the blood of common cultivated species have been generated to perform the anchor and comparison of the genome sequence. Finally, a 727‐Mb genome was assembled (Os, 2006; The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2011). The genome sequence of a wild potato species (S. commersonii) with outstanding resistance to diseases and adverse environments, especially cold stress, is also reported (Aversano et al., 2015). The genome of a self‐compatible diploid inbred line M6, which exhibits self‐compatibility, good tuber market quality and disease resistance, has also been completed sequenced (Leisner et al., 2018). Using the third‐generation sequencing technology, the genome of the diploid hybrid RH was completely sequenced (Zhou et al., 2020). Moreover, considerable progress has been made in sequencing the genome of tetraploid potato cultivars. The disclosure of the genome of tetraploid potato cultivars such as Atlantic and Otava has laid a foundation for further tetraploid potato research (Hoopes et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022). Diploid‐scale potato breeding effectively combines resistance genes and traits for diploid germplasm; however, the yield of diploid potatoes remains low. The yield of tetraploid potato cultivars is significantly higher than that of diploid potato cultivars. The interaction amongst genes in potato heterosis determines productivity and adaptability; according to this principle, each locus in tetraploid potato has four homologues and the interactions observed within and between loci are strong. Because of the high heterozygosity in genomes, tetraploid potatoes are highly adaptable and can stabilize and exhibit high yields under diverse environmental conditions. Moreover, the reference genome of diploid potato exhibits limitations in solving problems related to large structural variations or complex genome rearrangements in tetraploid cultivated potato genomes. Thus, additional reference genomes of tetraploid potatoes are urgently required. Although tetraploid heterozygous potatoes have advanced characteristics and high yield potential, the genome sequencing and assembly of these potatoes are more challenging than those of diploid potatoes. The advancement of third‐generation sequencing technology has led to improvements in reading length and sequencing accuracy, thereby making the analysis of complex gene compositions possible. Sequencing of a series of highly complex genomes, such as octoploid strawberry (Edger et al., 2019), rye (Li et al., 2021), water lily (Zhang et al., 2020) and tea (Wang et al., 2020b), has been completed. ‘Qingshu No.9’ (Q9, 2n = 4x = 48) is amongst the selective breeding potato varieties in China. This variety offers various crucial social and economic benefits and the highest yield, and it is grown in the largest planting area in China. We, herein, sequenced and assembled the genome of Q9, a homotetraploid heterozygote potato species. Then, we compared diploid and tetraploid potato genomes to investigate the evolution of haplotypes in polyploid potatoes. Based on different dicotyledon families, we performed the evolutionary analysis of potato genomes at a large scale. Furthermore, we performed a genome‐wide association analysis on the tuber flesh colour of 150 tetraploid heterozygous potatoes to identify candidate genes. The study findings highlight the contribution of a high‐quality reference genome to the analysis of complex genomes and the development of the potato industry.

Results

Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation

PacBio single‐molecule real‐time (SMRT) sequencing and Hi‐C sequencing were combined to generate a de novo genome assembly of the tetraploid potato Q9 (2n = 4x = 48). In total, 509.82 Gb raw reads equivalent to 190X genome coverage for Q9 were generated. After quality control, the clean reads were assembled, yielding a 2.67‐Gb genome assembly with a contig N50 size of 2.19 Mb (Table S1). The initial sequence assembly was polished using NextPolish, and the splicing errors were corrected. The Benchmarking Universal Single‐Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) (Simão et al., 2015) analysis conducted to evaluate the quality and completeness of the genome assembly revealed an assembly quality of 99.3% (Figure S1). The genome assembly was corrected in synteny analysis by using the Hi‐C technology, and a high‐quality, chromosome‐scale reference genome was constructed. Finally, an ultrahigh‐density genome map (Figure 1a) of Q9 (scaffold N50: 46.24 Mb) containing 48 chromosomes included in four haplotypes was constructed.
Figure 1

Overview of the tetraploid potato genome. The Q9 genome was assembled into A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes, each with 12 chromosomes. The circos plot of multidimensional topography: (a) chromosome length, (b) repeat density, (c) gene density and gene expression levels in the (d) root, (e) stolon, (f) stem, (g) leaf, (h) pedicel and (i) flower. Dark blue regions represent the highest density. The darker the colour, the greater the density. The central coloured lines represent the synteny amongst A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Overview of the tetraploid potato genome. The Q9 genome was assembled into A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes, each with 12 chromosomes. The circos plot of multidimensional topography: (a) chromosome length, (b) repeat density, (c) gene density and gene expression levels in the (d) root, (e) stolon, (f) stem, (g) leaf, (h) pedicel and (i) flower. Dark blue regions represent the highest density. The darker the colour, the greater the density. The central coloured lines represent the synteny amongst A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] The repetitive sequences (1.69 Gb), accounting for 63.44% of the total genome size, were identified using RepeatMasker, with long terminal repeats being the main transposable elements (Figure 1b, Table S2). By performing de novo gene prediction and homologous gene prediction with Maker (Holt and Yandell, 2011) along with the AUGUSTUS pipeline (Mario et al., 2006), genes and their functions were annotated for the Q9 genome. The average coding sequence length was approximately 1042 bp, and each gene contained an average of 4.78 exons. Through filtering, 126 070 protein‐coding genes were finally obtained, of which 125 077 were distributed on 48 chromosomes (Figure 1c; Table S3). The transcriptome data were mapped to the four Q9 genome haplotypes to verify the expression patterns of different haplotypes in different potato tissues. The gene expression at both distal regions of the chromosome was abundant in different parts, whereas that near the centromeric region was minimal or low (Figure 1d–i).

Synteny and whole‐genome duplication analyses

In this study, based on gene families of Solanaceae plants including potato, tomato, pepper and tobacco, as well as 15 other species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed. The Solanaceae species probably diverged from Theaceae 85 million years ago (MYA). Gene family expansion and contraction are crucial features of species selective evolution (Figure S2a). During evolution, Q9 acquired more new genes and gene families than other potato varieties. However, during individual species evolution, gene families were acquired and lost in varying degrees. The synteny analysis was conducted amongst the haplotypes A1, A2, A3 and A4 in the highly heterozygous autotetraploid Q9 genome, and a certain synteny was observed amongst these four haplotypes (Figure 2a). Approximately 13 328 genes exerted synteny between any two haplotypes. Of them, 42.69% exerted synteny between the haplotypes A1 and A2, 43.87% exerted synteny between A2 and A3 and 41.07% exerted synteny between A3 and A4 (Figure 2b, Figure S3). The collinearity between Q9 and Otava was consistent with that between Q9 and Atlantic (Figure S4). The heterozygosity of Q9 (1.91%) was significantly higher than those of Otava (1.53%) and Atlantic (1.78%), as determined using genomescope2 (Table S4, Figure S5). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distribution in the Q9 genome was found to be as uniform as that in Otava, and more long‐distance SNPs were found in Atlantic (Figures S6–S8).
Figure 2

Homologous genes and collinearity analysis of the four haplotypes. (a) Intergenomic comparison: Dot plot showing co‐orthologs of four haplotypes; (b) Syntenic blocks between A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes of Q9. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Homologous genes and collinearity analysis of the four haplotypes. (a) Intergenomic comparison: Dot plot showing co‐orthologs of four haplotypes; (b) Syntenic blocks between A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes of Q9. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] We analysed the expression of tetraploid potato genomic homologous genes. The expressions of most homologous genes were consistent between each of the two subgenomes (Figure S9). In total, 31 506 differentially expressed homologous genes were identified. Of them, 5913 (18.77%), 11 103 (35.24%) and 12 177 (38.65%) exhibited four, three and two differentially expressed homologous genes, respectively (Table 1). Obvious differences were noted in the expression of homologous genes from different tissues (Figure S10). This result might be attributed to the high heterozygosity of Q9, confirming that chromosomal fusion or divergence occurred in the Q9 genome during evolution and environmental adaptation.
Table 1

The number of genes and homologous genes of four haplotypes in Q9

No. of genes with A1No. of genes with A2No. of genes with A3No. of genes with A4No. of genes with 4 homologuesNo. of genes with 3 homologuesNo. of genes with 2 homologuesNo. of genes with 1 homologue
Chr1437340694100470990717971199146
Chr222233402283928171266888105089
Chr3300726102370362023711021384278
Chr428282568360121372938461371310
Chr52156222726692283573916593141
Chr626442356319717822448541217263
Chr71781189728372857335834968225
Chr82636295017422219648891646114
Chr9245723042658207858380983089
Chr101878223717502484262722958228
Chr112340222317861758331663838149
Chr1225211708327921102347811123281
Total591311 10312 1772313
The number of genes and homologous genes of four haplotypes in Q9 The synonymous substitution rate (Ks) of Q9 was calculated to determine the whole‐genome duplication (WGD) events that occurred in the Q9 genome. The peak value of the homologous gene pairs was 1, indicating that a WGD event occurred 1 MYA (Figure S2b). The divergence time of Q9 was closest to that of tomato, followed by pepper and tobacco, whereas it was far from that of the Theaceae family plants. Q9 diverged before the divergence of other Solanaceae species, which is consistent with the results of the phylogenetic tree. The Ks of four homologous chromosomes were generally consistent with each other in the four haplotypes (Figure S2c). The four genomes, namely Q9, DM, RH and M6, were compared and analysed to determine differences between these genomes. In total, 16 988 gene families were shared by the four genomes, with Q9 possessing the most gene families (Figure S11). Of them, 7723; 598, 2277 and 858 gene families were unique to Q9, DM, RH and M6, respectively. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis was performed to explore differences in functional genes between autotetraploid and diploid potatoes. Substantial differences were noted in mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination, DNA replication and nucleotide excision repair (Figure 3a).
Figure 3

Analysis of mismatch repair‐related genes in the tetraploid potato genomes. (a) KEGG enrichment analysis of tetraploid‐specific genes; (b) Regulatory mechanism of mismatch repair; (c) Major components of mismatch repair; (d), (e) and (f) The evolutionary tree, heatmap of differentially expressed genes and chromosomal distribution of MLHs, MSHs and RFCs in tetraploid potato genomes, respectively. The heatmap indicates flower, leaf, pedicel, root, stem and stolon from left to right. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Analysis of mismatch repair‐related genes in the tetraploid potato genomes. (a) KEGG enrichment analysis of tetraploid‐specific genes; (b) Regulatory mechanism of mismatch repair; (c) Major components of mismatch repair; (d), (e) and (f) The evolutionary tree, heatmap of differentially expressed genes and chromosomal distribution of MLHs, MSHs and RFCs in tetraploid potato genomes, respectively. The heatmap indicates flower, leaf, pedicel, root, stem and stolon from left to right. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Further analysis conducted to explore the mechanism of MMR regulation revealed that the key genes of mismatch recognition were MutS2, PMS1, MLH1/3, MSH2/3/6/7, RFC1/2/3 and PCNA and that the related excision gene was ExoI (Figure 3b). The comparison of three diploid genomes and a tetraploid genome showed that MLH3, MSH6/7 and RFC3 were significantly expanded (Figure 3c). Statistical analysis revealed that the 70 MLHs identified in the tetraploid potato genome were concentrated in the distal regions of chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 (Figure 3d); the 32 identified MSHs were distributed on chromosomes 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 and 11 (Figure 3e) and the 32 identified RFCs were located on chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 and 11, of which chromosomes 1, 8 and 11 had the highest number of genes (Figure 3f). Many DNA MMR‐related genes were enriched in the autotetraploid potato genome. In addition, MMR‐related differentially expressed genes were identified in various potato tissues. The DNA repair system plays a role in the face of cumulative effects of replication errors, environmental damages and ageing to maintain genome integrity and stability.

Genome‐wide association analysis of tetraploid cultivated potatoes

A total of 150 tetraploid cultivated species from China and The International Potato Center (CIP) were selected for simplified sequencing, and 10 364 high‐quality variation sites were detected. These high‐quality variation sites were then clustered with ADMIXTURE, and the largest subgroups (K) were inferred as 1–12. The cross‐validation (CV) error of each K value was calculated. At the K value ranging from 1 to 3, the CV error gradually increased; at K > 3, the CV error decreased rapidly; at K = 5, the CV error was the smallest (0.22) and at K > 5, the CV error gradually increased (Figure S12). Therefore, K = 5 was deemed as the most appropriate value; accordingly, the entire potato population was divided into five subgroups. Differences in the distribution pattern amongst the five subgroups could be observed on the principal component 1 (PC1) axis, and the clustering results were consistent with the group structure division (Figure 4a). In accordance with the Q value of each material in these five subgroups, each material was classified into the subgroup with the largest Q value. In total, 86, 11, 3, 26 and 24 genetic resources were found from subgroups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively (Figure 4b). The clustering results were consistent with the group structure division, and the five subgroups could be roughly clustered together (Figure 4c).
Figure 4

Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships amongst 150 tetraploid potatoes. (a) Principal components analysis (PCA) of accessions; (b) ADMIXTURE plot for tetraploid potato; (c) Bootstrapped tree of 150 tetraploid potato accessions based on genetic distance; (d) Manhattan plot of 150 tetraploid potatoes on the tuber flesh colour. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships amongst 150 tetraploid potatoes. (a) Principal components analysis (PCA) of accessions; (b) ADMIXTURE plot for tetraploid potato; (c) Bootstrapped tree of 150 tetraploid potato accessions based on genetic distance; (d) Manhattan plot of 150 tetraploid potatoes on the tuber flesh colour. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] The association analysis was performed on the tuber flesh colour of 150 potato varieties, and the Manhattan plot was constructed (Figure 4d). A total of 108 significant SNP sites were obtained, with P < 0.01 as the threshold (Table S5). Fifty‐eight genes, including 13 cytochrome P450 genes, were identified, of which 11 were distributed on chromosomes 2, 4, 5 and 6. In addition, three flavonoid synthesis‐related genes and a chalcone enzyme gene were identified on chromosome 5A4. Additionally, 22 glycosyl hydrolase and glycosyl transferase genes, 18 TFs and a methyltransferase gene were identified (Table S6).

Discussion

Currently, diploid hybrid potato genomes, namely DM, M6 and RH, have been sequenced. The genome sizes of DM and M6 haplotypes have been reported to be 727 Mb (The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2011) and 882 Mb (Leisner et al., 2018), respectively, with the genome size of the diploid heterozygous genome RH being 1.67 Gb (Zhou et al., 2020). These genomes are important in potato research; specifically, the RH genome is close to those of commercially cultivated tetraploid potatoes. Owing to the limitations of sequencing technology, tetraploid genomes were previously difficult to be sequenced. The Otava and Atlantic reference genomes of tetraploid potatoes recently provided a basis for the research of tetraploid cultivated potatoes. However, obtaining completed assemblies and homologous chromosomes from highly heterozygous and complex autotetraploid cultivated potato genomes was still challenging. These challenges could be overcome with the development of sequencing technology, particularly third‐generation sequencing. In this study, the high‐quality genome of tetraploid potato Q9 (2.67 Gb) was obtained. This genome is larger than the Atlantic genome and slightly smaller than the Otava genome, and its heterozygosity is significantly higher than that of Atlantic and Otava. The contig N50 size of the Q9 genome (2.19 Mb) was larger than that of Otava (2.1 Mb). The tetraploid potato reference genome will provide numerous vital resources for autotetraploid homologous genes to potato breeders and researchers. Ancient WGD evolutionary events (also known as ancient polyploidization events) occur commonly in plants, representing a powerful evolutionary force for the emergence of new gene functions and new species (Otto, 2007). Solanaceae and Theaceae species probably diverged 85 MYA. A WGD event occurred in tetraploid cultivated potatoes at approximately 1 MYA. The comparison of the tetraploid potato with three diploid potatoes indicated that the gene families derived from the tetraploid potatoes were involved in MMR. MMR is a crucial and conserved keeper of genetic information (Elez, 2021). The MMR protein plays a key role in DNA damage processing and signal processing. MMR can increase the fidelity of DNA replication by several orders of magnitude, whereas the lack of MMR can lead to the emergence of a mutant phenotype. The state of MMR can also affect interstitial and mitochondrial reorganization, DNA damage signals, apoptosis and cell type‐specific processes; however, the role of MMR in these processes remains unclear (Jiricny, 2006; Li, 2008; Marti et al., 2002). Compared with those of diploid potatoes, MSHs and MLHs in MMR proteins of tetraploid potatoes exhibited significant expansion. MSHs have a vital role in maintaining genome integrity and stability, and the lack of MSHs remarkably increases the DNA recombination rate (Emmanuel et al., 2006; Hoffman, 2004). The key proteins MLHs in MMR can also affect the recombination rate (Dion et al., 2010). Therefore, these genes were speculated to be critical for maintaining the stability of the autotetraploid potato genome. Furthermore, the genome‐wide association analysis of tetraploid cultivated potato species by using the tetraploid potato genome could associate candidate genes with specific chromosomes. In this study, many significant tuber colour‐associated SNP sites were found through the genome‐wide association analysis of potato flesh colour. Amongst them, 11 cytochrome P450 genes were distributed on chromosomes 2, 4, 5 and 6. F3′H and F3′5H are cytochrome P450 monooxygenases; F3′H could catalyse various oxidation reactions that depend on NADPH or NADPH, whereas F3′5H could catalyse hydroxylation at the 5′‐ or 3′‐position, 5′‐position of the flavonoid B ring in the presence of NADPH, and O2 and is the only enzyme system known to catalyse the 5′‐hydroxylation reaction of the B ring. Studies have indicated that F3′5H abundance in plant species at the transcription level can strongly affect anthocyanin synthesis (Grotewold, 2006; Petroni and Tonelli, 2011). One candidate gene, chalcone synthase (CHS), was identified on chromosome 5A4. CHS is the first key enzyme gene for flavonoid synthesis in plants. This enzyme catalyses the condensation of 4‐coumarin coenzyme A (CoA) and malonic acid CoA to form chalcone and provides a basic carbon framework for flavonoids (Gu et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2018). In addition, three candidate genes related to flavonoid synthesis and directly related to colour were found in the A2 haplotype. Moreover, genes related to glycosyl hydrolase, glycosyl transferase and the molecular modifications of anthocyanins were identified in this study. Anthocyanins are unstable under physiological pH conditions because of the presence of exposed hydroxyl groups. Flavonoid 3‐O‐carbonyl transferase transfers glucose transferase on UDP‐glucose to the C3 hydroxyl of the anthocyanin molecule to form coloured anthocyanins (Albert et al., 2014; Holton and Cornish, 1995; Zhang et al., 2019a). In addition, a methyl transferase gene was found on chromosome 8A4. Methylation modification mostly occurred on the C3 and C5 hydroxyl groups of the anthocyanidin molecule and sometimes on the C5 and C7 hydroxyl groups. Methylation modification stabilizes the B ring of anthocyanins, thereby reducing the chemical activity of the entire molecule and increasing their water solubility (Bernini et al., 2011; Wen, 2006). In the present study, 18 TFs, which were distributed in the four haplotypes (A1, A2, A3 and A4), were also identified. TFs play a vital role in the regulation of colour formation (Guo et al., 2014; Hao et al., 2020). This study provides autotetraploid cultivated potato assembly strategies and the basic data for promoting the breeding of different potato varieties.

Materials and methods

Materials and sequencing

‘Qingshu No. 9’ (Q9, S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum) is a late‐maturing potato variety that was obtained from selective breeding through hybridization between 3 875 213 and APHRODITE at the Institute of Biotechnology, Qinghai Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (Liao et al., 2012). Q9 offers the advantages of high yield, high‐quality, drought tolerance, cold tolerance, late blight resistance and ring rot resistance and is one of the most crucial autotetraploid cultivated potatoes in the main potato‐producing regions of China. We used the SMRT technology (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) to sequence the tetraploid Q9 genome and reads with a total length equivalent to ~190X genome coverage were obtained. Transcriptomes of different Q9 tissues were sequenced and used for the genome assembly. In addition, 150 tetraploid potato accessions, including 44 from China, 102 from CIP and 4 from other countries, were collected (Table S7). The CTAB method was used to extract DNA, and the AFSM technology was used for simplified sequencing (Xia et al., 2014).

Genome assembly and chromosome construction

The extracted DNA was sequenced on a PacBio Sequel 2 platform (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) with the CCS model and a total of three SMRT cells. The resulting BAM files were subjected to the pbccs program (https://ccs.how/) with default parameters, resulting in 509.82‐Gb HiFi reads. We further used the hifiasm (Cheng et al., 2012) assembler (v. 0.15.1‐r329) to assemble these HiFi reads with default parameters. The resulting ‘p_utg.gfa’ file contained the haplotype‐resolved unitig graph without small bubbles and was used to extract phased contigs. A total of 312.78‐Gb Hi‐C reads were mapped to the initially phased contigs by using BWA‐MEM (Li and Durbin, 2009), and uniquely mapped reads were extracted using SAMtools with the command ‘samtools view ‐bq 40’. We then used the ALLHiC_corrector program implemented in the ALLHiC (Zhang et al., 2019b) package to correct the misjoined or chimeric contigs based on the contact pattern of Hi‐C signals. Additionally, an allelic contig table was prepared by aligning coding sequences from a diploid potato assembly, downloaded from Phytozome (v. 12.0) and the phased contigs by using a GMAP‐based approach (Wu and Watanabe, 2005), guided by an ALLHiC GitHub document. The second round of Hi‐C read mapping was performed on the corrected contigs. The resulting BAM file was filtered and subjected to the standard ALLHiC phasing pipeline, including pruning, partition, optimization and construction, along with the corrected contigs. The scaffolding results were further assessed using the Hi‐C heatmap, plotted using the ALLHiC_plot function and evaluated using dot plot analysis; dot plots were generated from the jcvi MCscan package (https://github.com/tanghaibao/jcvi/wiki/MCscan‐(Python‐version)). Based on the single‐copy homologous plant‐specific database, the completeness of the genome assembly was assessed using BUSCO (Simão et al., 2015).

Gene prediction and functional annotation

Genome‐wide repetitive sequences were annotated de novo with RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org). Based on the repeat‐masked genome, the protein‐coding genes were predicted using ab initio calculations, a combination of conservation of protein homologues and transcript assembly. The homology‐based prediction was performed using the protein sequences of potato genomes (DM, M6 and RH) and the genome of Solanaceae crops such as tobacco, red pepper and tomato. The transcriptomes of six different Q9 tissues, namely roots, stems, leaves, stolons, flowers and pedicels, were used for auxiliary annotation. MAKER was used to integrate these results into final gene models (Holt and Yandell, 2011). AUGUSTUS software was used for gene prediction integration (Mario et al., 2006).

Construction of phylogenetic tree and estimation of evolutionary time

Single‐copy orthologous genes of Solanaceae plants, including potato (one tetraploid and three known diploids), tomato, pepper and tobacco, as well as 20 other species, including 8 monocotyledonous and 18 dicotyledonous plants, were identified using the OrthoMCL (Li et al., 2003) program. FastTree (v. 2.1.9) (Price et al., 2010) was used to construct a maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on these single‐copy orthologous genes. This ML tree was converted into a super‐time‐scale phylogenetic tree by r8s using the calibration time on the TimeTree website (Kumar et al., 2017).

Synteny and Ks analyses

MCScanX with default parameters was used to identify collinear blocks. Protein sequences were used as queries to search against the genomes of other plant species and find the best matching pair (Wang et al., 2012). Each aligned block represented homologous pairs derived from a common ancestor. The Nei–Gojobori method implemented in PAML was adopted to calculate the Ks value (the number of synonymous substitutions for each synonymous site) of the homologous gene in the collinear region, and the median Ks was considered to represent the collinear region (Yang, 2007). The values of all gene pairs were plotted to determine the assumed WGD events of tetraploid potatoes. The formula t = Ks/2r represents the neutral substitution rate and was used to estimate the duplication time of tetraploid potatoes and the divergence time of tetraploid potatoes from other tree species.

The SNP invocation and comment

The Perl script (http://afsmseq.sourceforge.net/) was used to filter the original sequencing data, and the total number of reads obtained from sequencing was obtained simultaneously. Reads were allocated to each individual by using barcodes designed in accordance with the AFSM technology, and the number of reads of each individual was calculated. Bowtie2 software (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) was used to map the corrected sequencing reads with the tetraploid genome, and SAMtools (Li et al., 2009) and VCFtools (http://vcftools.sourceforge.net/) were used to detect the SNP and indel sites.

Population structure and genetic diversity

The genetic distance matrix of samples was constructed using PHYLIP (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html), and Notepad++ software was used to adapt the genetic distance matrix file into the appropriate format. The NJ method was used to construct the phylogenetic tree, whereas iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/) was used to construct the phylogenetic tree. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using GCTA software for the potato population materials based on the selected SNPs (Yang et al., 2011). R software was used to calculate the vector of each PC and draw the PCA scatter plot. In addition, ADMIXTURE software (Alexander et al., 2009) was used to analyse the population structure and estimate the optimal number of subgroups. PLINK software (Purcell et al., 2007) was used to adjust the input file format of ADMIXTURE and input the file. The K value representing the number of subgroups ranged from 1 to 12, and the most appropriate value was selected in accordance with the obtained CV error. The genetic component coefficient (Q) of each material in each subgroup was used to construct the population genetic structure matrix.

Genome‐wide association analysis of fresh potato tuber colour

High‐quality SNPs and indels were used to perform a genome‐wide association analysis on the potato flesh colour of this population (Tables S7 and S8). The compressed mixed linear model of TASSEL 5.0 software (Bradbury et al., 2007) was used for the association analysis, and the key SNP sites and candidate genes were obtained.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Z.X. and W.J. conceived the study. Z.X., F.W., M.Z., L.Z., Y. Z., Y. M., H. S., S.J., C.Z. and Y.B. participated in various aspects including biological sample collection, sample preparation, quality control and conducted the experimental work. Z.X. created partial bioinformatics scripts and analysed the data. W.J. provided potato accessions for sequencing and performed other experiments. Z.X., L.Z., S.J., C.Z. and Y.B. performed genome sequencing, assembly, annotation and analyses. Z.X., L.Z. and S.J. performed transcriptome and GWAS analyses. M.Z., Z.X., L.Z., S.J., C.Z. and Y.B. wrote and improved the manuscript. W.W. reviewed and contributed to improving the manuscript. Z.X. revised the last version of the manuscript. Z.X. and W.J. supervised the whole study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Figure S1 Assembly quality assessment by BUSCO. Figure S2 Genome evolution and gene family analysis. Figure S3 Collinearity analysis for the four haplotypes of Solanum tuberosum Q9. Figure S4 Collinearity analysis of Q9 genome, Otava genome and Atlantic genome (a) Comparison of collinearity between Q9 and Otava; (b) Comparison of collinearity between Q9 and Atlantic. Figure S5 Comparing the heterozygosity of different cultivated species, the order from left to right is Q9, Otava and Atlantic. Figure S6 SNP distribution map of 10KB window in Q9, Otava and Atlantic. Figure S7 SNPs density map with spacing less than 150bp identified by three cultivated potatoes. Figure S8 Box diagram of the proportion of SNPs in long‐distance SNPs (spacing >1000 bp) (long‐distance SNP/all SNPs). Figure S9 Expression of homologs in every two haplotypes. Figure S10 Expression analysis of homologous genes in all four haplotypes in 12 groups of chromosomes. From left to right are flower, leaf, pedicel, root, stem and stolon. Figure S11 Shared and unique gene families among DM, M6, RH and Q9 potato species. Figure S12 Cross‐validation (CV) errors. Table S1 Statistics of the sequenced and assembled genome of potato Q9. Table S2 The type, length and percentage of repeat sequences in Q9 genome. Table S3 Gene annotation statistics of Q9 genome. Table S4 Heterozygosity statistics of tetraploid potato Q9, Otava and Atlantic. Table S5 Significant SNP sites of flesh color. Table S6 The candidate gene of flesh color. Table S7 Source and flesh color of 150 tetraploid cultivated potatoes. Table S8 Identification standard of potato flesh color. Click here for additional data file.
  55 in total

1.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Jian Yang; S Hong Lee; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  The multifaceted mismatch-repair system.

Authors:  Josef Jiricny
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Genetics and Biochemistry of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis.

Authors:  T. A. Holton; E. C. Cornish
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Genome sequence of M6, a diploid inbred clone of the high-glycoalkaloid-producing tuber-bearing potato species Solanum chacoense, reveals residual heterozygosity.

Authors:  Courtney P Leisner; John P Hamilton; Emily Crisovan; Norma C Manrique-Carpintero; Alexandre P Marand; Linsey Newton; Gina M Pham; Jiming Jiang; David S Douches; Shelley H Jansky; C Robin Buell
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 6.  The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments.

Authors:  Erich Grotewold
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

7.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Extensive simple sequence repeat genotyping of potato landraces supports a major reevaluation of their gene pool structure and classification.

Authors:  David M Spooner; Jorge Núñez; Guillermo Trujillo; María del Rosario Herrera; Frank Guzmán; Marc Ghislain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Ning Guo; Feng Cheng; Jian Wu; Bo Liu; Shuning Zheng; Jianli Liang; Xiaowu Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Haplotype-resolved genome analyses of a heterozygous diploid potato.

Authors:  Qian Zhou; Dié Tang; Wu Huang; Zhongmin Yang; Yu Zhang; John P Hamilton; Richard G F Visser; Christian W B Bachem; C Robin Buell; Zhonghua Zhang; Chunzhi Zhang; Sanwen Huang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.