| Literature DB >> 35767385 |
Fang Wang1,2,3,4, Zhiqiang Xia5,6, Meiling Zou5,6, Long Zhao1,2, Sirong Jiang5,6, Yun Zhou1,2,3,4, Chenji Zhang5,6, Yongzhen Ma1, Yuting Bao5,6, Haihong Sun1,2,3,4, Wenquan Wang6, Jian Wang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) originated in the Andes and evolved its vegetative propagation strategy through short day-dependent tuber development. Herein, we present a high-quality, chromosome-scale reference genome sequence of a tetraploid potato cultivar. The total length of this genome assembly was 2.67 Gb, with scaffold N50 and contig N50 sizes of 46.24 and 2.19 Mb, respectively. In total, 1.69 Gb repetitive sequences were obtained through de novo annotation, and long terminal repeats were the main transposable elements. A total of 126 070 protein-coding genes were annotated, of which 125 077 (99.21%) were located on chromosomes. The 48 chromosomes were classified into four haplotypes. We annotated 31 506 homologous genes, including 5913 (18.77%) genes with four homologues, 11 103 (35.24%) with three homologues, 12 177 (38.65%) with two homologues and 2313 (7.34%) with one homologue. MLH3, MSH6/7 and RFC3, which are the genes involved in the mismatch repair pathway, were found to be significantly expanded in the tetraploid potato genome relative to the diploid potato genome. Genome-wide association analysis revealed that cytochrome P450, flavonoid synthesis, chalcone enzyme, glycosyl hydrolase and glycosyl transferase genes were significantly correlated with the flesh colours of potato tuber in 150 tetraploid potatoes. This study provides valuable insights into the highly heterozygous autotetraploid potato genome and may facilitate the development of tools for potato cultivar breeding and further studies on autotetraploid crops.Entities:
Keywords: comparative genomics; genome-wide association analysis; genomics; mismatch repair; tetraploid potato
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35767385 PMCID: PMC9491450 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 13.263
Figure 1Overview of the tetraploid potato genome. The Q9 genome was assembled into A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes, each with 12 chromosomes. The circos plot of multidimensional topography: (a) chromosome length, (b) repeat density, (c) gene density and gene expression levels in the (d) root, (e) stolon, (f) stem, (g) leaf, (h) pedicel and (i) flower. Dark blue regions represent the highest density. The darker the colour, the greater the density. The central coloured lines represent the synteny amongst A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2Homologous genes and collinearity analysis of the four haplotypes. (a) Intergenomic comparison: Dot plot showing co‐orthologs of four haplotypes; (b) Syntenic blocks between A1, A2, A3 and A4 haplotypes of Q9. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
The number of genes and homologous genes of four haplotypes in Q9
| No. of genes with A1 | No. of genes with A2 | No. of genes with A3 | No. of genes with A4 | No. of genes with 4 homologues | No. of genes with 3 homologues | No. of genes with 2 homologues | No. of genes with 1 homologue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chr1 | 4373 | 4069 | 4100 | 4709 | 907 | 1797 | 1199 | 146 |
| Chr2 | 2223 | 3402 | 2839 | 2817 | 1266 | 888 | 1050 | 89 |
| Chr3 | 3007 | 2610 | 2370 | 3620 | 237 | 1102 | 1384 | 278 |
| Chr4 | 2828 | 2568 | 3601 | 2137 | 293 | 846 | 1371 | 310 |
| Chr5 | 2156 | 2227 | 2669 | 2283 | 573 | 916 | 593 | 141 |
| Chr6 | 2644 | 2356 | 3197 | 1782 | 244 | 854 | 1217 | 263 |
| Chr7 | 1781 | 1897 | 2837 | 2857 | 335 | 834 | 968 | 225 |
| Chr8 | 2636 | 2950 | 1742 | 2219 | 648 | 891 | 646 | 114 |
| Chr9 | 2457 | 2304 | 2658 | 2078 | 583 | 809 | 830 | 89 |
| Chr10 | 1878 | 2237 | 1750 | 2484 | 262 | 722 | 958 | 228 |
| Chr11 | 2340 | 2223 | 1786 | 1758 | 331 | 663 | 838 | 149 |
| Chr12 | 2521 | 1708 | 3279 | 2110 | 234 | 781 | 1123 | 281 |
| Total | – | – | – | – | 5913 | 11 103 | 12 177 | 2313 |
Figure 3Analysis of mismatch repair‐related genes in the tetraploid potato genomes. (a) KEGG enrichment analysis of tetraploid‐specific genes; (b) Regulatory mechanism of mismatch repair; (c) Major components of mismatch repair; (d), (e) and (f) The evolutionary tree, heatmap of differentially expressed genes and chromosomal distribution of MLHs, MSHs and RFCs in tetraploid potato genomes, respectively. The heatmap indicates flower, leaf, pedicel, root, stem and stolon from left to right. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships amongst 150 tetraploid potatoes. (a) Principal components analysis (PCA) of accessions; (b) ADMIXTURE plot for tetraploid potato; (c) Bootstrapped tree of 150 tetraploid potato accessions based on genetic distance; (d) Manhattan plot of 150 tetraploid potatoes on the tuber flesh colour. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]