Literature DB >> 35766687

Cadaveric study of anatomical measurement of isthmus parameters of lumbar spine to guide cortical bone screw placement.

Paerhati Rexiti1, Dilimulati Aikeremu2, Shuiquan Wang3, Nueraihemaiti Abuduwali4, Alafate Kahaer1, Weibin Sheng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reduce surgical exposure and improve accuracy, this study evaluated the anatomical distance parameter D (including D1, D2, and D3) of the lumbar isthmus for cortical bone screw insertion.
METHODS: A total of 25 structurally complete lumbar dry specimens were used for lumbar anatomy measurements. The six cadaver specimens were divided into upper and lower parts on the plane of the T11-T12 vertebrae, and we use the lower parts. Therefore, six lumbar wet specimens and another four complete lumbar dry specimens were selected. The lumbar isthmus tangent point was considered a coordinate origin, and the insertion point was determined through translating the distance of D1 value to the midline of the vertebral body horizontally and then vertically moved toward inferior board of the transverse process with the distance of D3 value.
RESULTS: In four dry and six wet intact lumbar specimens, cortical bone screws were placed according to the average value of the isthmus parameter D. A total of 100 trajectories were verified in specimens by X-ray and computed topography scan to evaluate the safety, accuracy, and feasibility of the surgical use of isthmus parameter D. Using this parameter, the rates of excellent screw placement were 95% (38/40) in four dry specimens and 88.7% (53/60) in six wet specimens.
CONCLUSION: The isthmus parameter D is easier to use by the operator, which can improve surgical accuracy and reduce operation time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35766687      PMCID: PMC9575907          DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20210729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)        ISSN: 0104-4230            Impact factor:   1.712


  16 in total

1.  Complications associated with pedicle screws.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; F Denis; J H Perra; M R Pinto; M D Smith; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Jae-Lim Cho; Dong-Jun Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory?

Authors:  Masaki Ueno; Rina Sakai; Kensei Tanaka; Gen Inoue; Kentaro Uchida; Takayuki Imura; Wataru Saito; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Naonobu Takahira; Kiyoshi Mabuchi; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-01-16

4.  Measurement of lumbar isthmus parameters for novel starting points for cortical bone trajectory screws using computed radiography.

Authors:  Paerhati Rexiti; Tuerhongjiang Abudurexiti; Nueraihemaiti Abuduwali; Shuiquan Wang; Weibin Sheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note.

Authors:  Masaki Ueno; Takayuki Imura; Gen Inoue; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-09-06

6.  Effect of physiological loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Daniel A Baluch; Alpesh A Patel; Brett Lullo; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Ngoc-Lam Nguyen; Gerard Carandang; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pedicle screw pullout strength. Correlation with insertional torque.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; D N Kunz; M E Cooke; R McCabe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation?

Authors:  Keitaro Matsukawa; Eiko Taguchi; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Asazuma; Koichi Nemoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions.

Authors:  R H Wittenberg; M Shea; D E Swartz; K S Lee; A A White; W C Hayes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw.

Authors:  Masaki Mizuno; Keita Kuraishi; Yasuyuki Umeda; Takanori Sano; Masanori Tsuji; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.