Literature DB >> 35765350

A comparative study on silicon nitride, titanium and polyether ether ketone on mouse pre-osteoblast cells.

Neelam Ahuja1, Kamal R Awad1,2, Marco Brotto1, Pranesh B Aswath2, Venu Varanasi1,2.   

Abstract

The current study provides more insights about the surface bioactivity of the silicon nitride (Si3N4) as a potential candidate for bone regeneration in craniofacial and orthopaedic applications compared with conventional implantation materials. Current skeletal reconstructive materials such as titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) are limited by poor long-term stability, biocompatibility and prolonged healing. Si3N4 is an FDA-approved material for an intervertebral spacer in spinal fusion applications. It is biocompatible and has antimicrobial properties. Here, we hypothesize that Si3N4 was found to be an osteoconductive material and conducts the growth, differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells for extracellular matrix deposition, mineralization and eventual bone regeneration for craniofacial and orthopaedic applications. MC3T3-E1 cells were used to study the osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization on sterile samples of Si3N4, titanium alloy and PEEK. The samples were then analysed for extracellular matrix deposition and mineralization by FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, EDX, Alizarin Red, qRT-PCR and ELISA. The in vitro study indicates the formation of collagen fibres and mineral deposition on all three sample surfaces. There was more profound and faster ECM deposition and mineralization on Si3N4 surface as compared to titanium and PEEK. The FTIR and Raman spectroscopy show formation of collagen and mineral deposition at 30 days for Si3N4 and titanium and not PEEK. The peaks shown by Raman for Si3N4 resemble closely to natural bone. Results also indicate the upregulation of osteogenic transcription factors such as RUNX2, SP7, collagen type I and osteocalcin. The authors concluded that Si3N4 rapidly conducts mineralized tissue formation via extracellular matrix deposition and biomarker expression in mouse calvarial pre-osteoblast cells. Thus, this study confirms that the bioactive Si3N4 could be a potential material for craniofacial and orthopaedic applications leading to rapid bone regeneration that resemble the natural bone structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MC3T3-E1 cells; collagen formation; hydroxyapatite; silicon nitride; titanium

Year:  2020        PMID: 35765350      PMCID: PMC9236125          DOI: 10.1002/mds3.10139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Devices Sens        ISSN: 2573-802X


  32 in total

Review 1.  Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; C Johansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-regulated interactions between Osterix and Runx2 are critical for the transcriptional osteogenic program.

Authors:  Natalia Artigas; Carlos Ureña; Edgardo Rodríguez-Carballo; José Luis Rosa; Francesc Ventura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  PEEK Versus Ti Interbody Fusion Devices: Resultant Fusion, Bone Apposition, Initial and 26-Week Biomechanics.

Authors:  Matthew Henry Pelletier; Nicholas Cordaro; Vaibhav M Punjabi; Matthew Waites; Abe Lau; William R Walsh
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 4.  New insights into the biology of osteocalcin.

Authors:  Meredith L Zoch; Thomas L Clemens; Ryan C Riddle
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Enhanced interfacial adhesion and osteogenesis for rapid "bone-like" biomineralization by PECVD-based silicon oxynitride overlays.

Authors:  Azhar Ilyas; Nickolay V Lavrik; Harry K W Kim; Pranesh B Aswath; Venu G Varanasi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions.

Authors:  V G Varanasi; E Saiz; P M Loomer; B Ancheta; N Uritani; S P Ho; A P Tomsia; S J Marshall; G W Marshall
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Chelsea Twohig; Sunil Kumar Boda; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

8.  Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite.

Authors:  Yi Deng; Xiaochen Liu; Anxiu Xu; Lixin Wang; Zuyuan Luo; Yunfei Zheng; Feng Deng; Jie Wei; Zhihui Tang; Shicheng Wei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-02-17

9.  In Vivo Osseointegration Performance of Titanium Dioxide Coating Modified Polyetheretherketone Using Arc Ion Plating for Spinal Implant Application.

Authors:  Hsi-Kai Tsou; Meng-Hui Chi; Yi-Wen Hung; Chi-Jen Chung; Ju-Liang He
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Annexin-enriched osteoblast-derived vesicles act as an extracellular site of mineral nucleation within developing stem cell cultures.

Authors:  O G Davies; S C Cox; R L Williams; D Tsaroucha; R M Dorrepaal; M P Lewis; L M Grover
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.