Literature DB >> 35764759

The Impact of Internal Medicine Clerkship Characteristics and NBME Subject Exams on USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge Exam Performance.

Matthew Fitz1, William Adams2, Marc Heincelman3, Steve Haist4, Karina Whelan5, LeeAnn Cox6, Uyen-Thi Cao7, Susan Hingle8, Amanda Raff9, Bruce Houghton10, Janet Fitzpatrick11, Ryan Nall12, Jennifer Foster13, Jonathan Appelbaum14, Cyril Grum15, Anna Donovan16, Stuart Kiken17, Reeni Abraham18, Marti Hlafka8, Chad Miller19, Saurabh Bansal20, Douglas Paauw21, Cindy J Lai22, Amber Pincavage23, Gauri Agarwal24, Cynthia Burns25, Horatio Holzer26, Katie Lappé27, Viju John28, Blake Barker18, Nina Mingioni29, Deepti Rao30, Laura Zakowski31, Chayan Chakraborti32, Winter Williams33, William Kelly34.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residency program directors will likely emphasize the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) exam more during residency application given the recent USMLE Step 1 transition to pass/fail scoring. We examined how internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exam scores affect USMLE Step 2 CK performance.
DESIGN: The authors used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to determine associations between Step 2 CK performance and internal medicine clerkship characteristics and NBME subject exams. The sample had 21,280 examinees' first Step 2 CK scores for analysis.
RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, Step 1 performance (standardized β = 0.45, p < .001) and NBME medicine subject exam performance (standardized β = 0.40, p < .001) accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in Step 2 CK performance. Students who completed the internal medicine clerkship last in the academic year scored lower on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = -3.17 p < .001). Students who had a criterion score for passing the NBME medicine subject exam scored higher on Step 2 CK (Mdiff = 1.10, p = .03). There was no association between Step 2 CK performance and other internal medicine clerkship characteristics (all p > 0.05) nor with the total NBME subject exams completed (β=0.05, p = .78).
CONCLUSION: Despite similarities between NBME subject exams and Step 2 CK, the authors did not identify improved Step 2 CK performance for students who had more NBME subject exams. The lack of association of Step 2 CK performance with many internal medicine clerkship characteristics and more NBME subject exams has implications for future clerkship structure and summative assessment. The improved Step 2 CK performance in students that completed their internal medicine clerkship earlier warrants further study given the anticipated increase in emphasis on Step 2 CK.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35764759      PMCID: PMC9296728          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07520-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  19 in total

1.  Is there equivalency between students in a longitudinal, rural clerkship and a traditional urban-based program?

Authors:  Therese Zink; David V Power; Deborah Finstad; Kathleen D Brooks
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Dropping the shelf examination: does it affect student performance on the United States Medical Licensure Examination Step 2?

Authors:  Randy M Rockney; Robin G Allister
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

3.  Predicting performances on the NBME Surgery Subject Test and USMLE Step 2: the effects of surgery clerkship timing and length.

Authors:  D R Ripkey; S M Case; D B Swanson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Academic outcomes of a community-based longitudinal integrated clerkships program.

Authors:  Robyn Latessa; Norma Beaty; Kenneth Royal; Gaye Colvin; Donald E Pathman; Jeffery Heck
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  A National Survey of Undergraduate Clinical Education in Internal Medicine.

Authors:  Amber T Pincavage; Mark J Fagan; Nora Y Osman; Debra S Leizman; Deborah DeWaay; Camilla Curren; Nadia Ismail; Karen Szauter; Michael Kisielewski; Amy W Shaheen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Why Not Wait? Eight Institutions Share Their Experiences Moving United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 After Core Clinical Clerkships.

Authors:  Michelle Daniel; Amy Fleming; Colleen O'Conner Grochowski; Vicky Harnik; Sibel Klimstra; Gail Morrison; Arnyce Pock; Michael L Schwartz; Sally Santen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 7.  Testing and evaluation: the present and future of the assessment of medical professionals.

Authors:  Steven A Haist; Agata P Butler; Miguel A Paniagua
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Examining Demographics, Prior Academic Performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rubright; Michael Jodoin; Michael A Barone
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Correlation of National Board of Medical Examiners scores with United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 And Step 2 scores.

Authors:  Christopher M Zahn; Aaron Saguil; Anthony R Artino; Ting Dong; Gerald Ming; Jessica T Servey; Erin Balog; Matthew Goldenberg; Steven J Durning
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Educational outcomes of the Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: a way forward for medical education.

Authors:  David Hirsh; Elizabeth Gaufberg; Barbara Ogur; Pieter Cohen; Edward Krupat; Malcolm Cox; Stephen Pelletier; David Bor
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  1 in total

1.  Consequence in Competency-Based Education: Individualize, but Do Not Compromise.

Authors:  Katherine Gielissen; Lia Logio; Kelli Qua; Paul Hemmer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.