Literature DB >> 35762571

Taking on SARS-CoV-2.

Paola Kučan Brlić1, Ilija Brizić1.   

Abstract

A new study sheds light on how SARS-CoV-2 influences the way natural killer cells can recognize and kill infected cells.
© 2022, Kučan Brlić and Brizić.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADCC; ADNKA; SARS-CoV-2; immunology; infectious disease; inflammation; innate immunity; microbiology; natural killer cells; viruses

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35762571      PMCID: PMC9239673          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.713


Related research article Fielding CA, Sabberwal P, Williamson JC, Greenwood EJD, Crozier TWM, Zelek W, Seow J, Graham C, Huettner I, Edgeworth JD, Price DA, Morgan BP, Ladell K, Eberl M, Humphreys IR, Merrick B, Doores K, Wilson SJ, Lehner PJ, Wang ECY, Stanton RJ. 2022. SARS-CoV-2 host-shutoff impacts innate NK cell functions, but antibody-dependent NK activity is strongly activated through non-spike antibodies. eLife 11:e74489. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74489. Responding to a viral infection is a complex, multistep process that involves a multitude of immune actors. Innate immunity acts first, deploying a battery of cellular and molecular entities which are not specific to the invading pathogen. Natural killer cells, for instance, are powerful antiviral agents which can recognize and kill cells infected with a broad range of viruses (Björkström et al., 2022). An adaptive immune response is then mounted, which specifically targets the virus causing the infection. For example, antibodies precisely selected to bind to a range of viral proteins are produced and released in large numbers. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, both innate and adaptive responses are considered to be essential for the control of infection (Merad et al., 2022). For natural killer cells to eliminate their targets, a number of stress-induced molecules must first be displayed on the surface of infected cells; there, they can be recognized by receptors on natural killer cells, a process which activates the cells’ killing programme. However, some natural killer cells also recognize infected cells by harnessing virus-specific antibodies produced by the adaptive immune response. This mechanism, known as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), involves natural killer cells expressing an activating receptor which interacts with the tail end of antibodies. Despite the efficiency of natural killer cells, viruses often have a broad arsenal of strategies at their disposal to escape these cells. Whether SARS-CoV-2 actively evades early natural killer cell response, and whether antibodies engage these cells via ADCC to protect against COVID-19, remains unclear. Now, in eLife, Richard Stanton and colleagues at various institutions in the United Kingdom – including Ceri Fielding of Cardiff University as first author – report results showing how SARS-CoV-2 interferes with the recognition processes of natural killer cells during the early stages of infection (Fielding et al., 2022). First, the team screened which proteins are expressed on the surface of infected cells. This showed that SARS-CoV-2 actively evades natural killer cells by preventing the synthesis of several ligands that bind to natural killer cell’s receptors (Figure 1A). Further experiments revealed the identity of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins which could be responsible for this effect: the viral proteins Nsp1 and Nsp14, which could cooperate to reduce the expression of a number of surface proteins recognized by natural killer cells. The viral proteins likely perform this role by degrading the mRNA coding for the ligands and inhibiting translation in the cell; according to previous reports, this strategy has also been used against other factors involved in the innate immune response (Hsu et al., 2021; Thoms et al., 2020). Interestingly, however, recent evidence suggests that the related viral protein Nsp13 can actually increase the activation of natural killer cells by interfering with a receptor which inhibits the cells’ killing response (Hammer et al., 2022). How these opposing effects of SARS-CoV-2 affect the way natural killer cells control infections in vivo remains to be determined.
Figure 1.

The two faces of the natural killer cell response against SARS-CoV-2.

(A) SARS-CoV-2 infection interferes with the early activation of natural killer cells by having the viral proteins Nsp1 and Nsp14 prevent the synthesis of several surface proteins (MICA, Nectin1, ULBP2, B7–H6) that can activate natural killer cells. This leads to a dampening of that innate immune response, with impaired production of factors (IFNγ and TNFα) that promote the immune response and altered degranulation (a marker of the ability of natural killer cells to kill infected cells). (B) Antibodies produced against specific SARS-CoV-2 proteins – Nucleocapsid, Membrane and ORF3a – which are expressed on the membrane of infected cells, can efficiently trigger natural killer cell activation. This process takes place via CD16, an activating receptor on the surface of natural killer cells that interacts with the tail end portion of antibodies.

The two faces of the natural killer cell response against SARS-CoV-2.

(A) SARS-CoV-2 infection interferes with the early activation of natural killer cells by having the viral proteins Nsp1 and Nsp14 prevent the synthesis of several surface proteins (MICA, Nectin1, ULBP2, B7–H6) that can activate natural killer cells. This leads to a dampening of that innate immune response, with impaired production of factors (IFNγ and TNFα) that promote the immune response and altered degranulation (a marker of the ability of natural killer cells to kill infected cells). (B) Antibodies produced against specific SARS-CoV-2 proteins – Nucleocapsid, Membrane and ORF3a – which are expressed on the membrane of infected cells, can efficiently trigger natural killer cell activation. This process takes place via CD16, an activating receptor on the surface of natural killer cells that interacts with the tail end portion of antibodies. Fielding et al. then showed that natural killer cells can be efficiently triggered by antibodies bound to SARS-CoV-2-infected cells (Figure 1B), demonstrating that the ADCC mechanism can activate these cells during COVID-19 infection. However, the antibodies triggering ADCC were not the ones targeting the spike protein, the viral component used in many current vaccines. In fact, further experiments revealed that vaccination-induced antibodies targeting the spike protein poorly engaged natural killer cells, a result in line with a study showing that vaccination-induced antibodies are not as good at mediating ADCC compared to infection-induced antibodies (Rieke et al., 2022). Fielding et al. then went on to reveal that the antibodies involved in ADCC were those produced in reaction to other viral proteins expressed at the surface of infected cells. In most COVID-19 patients, the infection-induced antibodies able to trigger ADCC persisted for at least six months. Together, these results suggest that it could be possible to improve vaccine design by adding viral proteins which induce antibodies capable of triggering ADCC in natural killer cells to the current formulation. In addition, promoting natural killer cell activity by boosting ADCC response in patients with severe COVID-19 could become a therapeutic option, as these individuals show high levels of antibodies and impaired natural killer cell function (Merad et al., 2022; Witkowski et al., 2021).
  8 in total

Review 1.  The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19.

Authors:  Miriam Merad; Catherine A Blish; Federica Sallusto; Akiko Iwasaki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Against SARS-CoV-2 After Natural Infection Is More Potent Than After Vaccination.

Authors:  Gereon J Rieke; Kathrin van Bremen; Jenny Bischoff; Michael ToVinh; Malte B Monin; Stefan Schlabe; Jan Raabe; Kim M Kaiser; Claudia Finnemann; Alexandru Odainic; Anushka Kudaliyanage; Eicke Latz; Christian P Strassburg; Christoph Boesecke; Susanne V Schmidt; Benjamin Krämer; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Jacob Nattermann
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Untimely TGFβ responses in COVID-19 limit antiviral functions of NK cells.

Authors:  Mario Witkowski; Caroline Tizian; Marta Ferreira-Gomes; Daniela Niemeyer; Terry C Jones; Frederik Heinrich; Stefan Frischbutter; Stefan Angermair; Thordis Hohnstein; Irene Mattiola; Philipp Nawrath; Sophie McEwen; Silvia Zocche; Edoardo Viviano; Gitta Anne Heinz; Marcus Maurer; Uwe Kölsch; Robert Lorenz Chua; Tom Aschman; Christian Meisel; Josefine Radke; Birgit Sawitzki; Jobst Roehmel; Kristina Allers; Verena Moos; Thomas Schneider; Leif Hanitsch; Marcus A Mall; Christian Conrad; Helena Radbruch; Claudia U Duerr; Joseph A Trapani; Emanuela Marcenaro; Tilmann Kallinich; Victor M Corman; Florian Kurth; Leif Erik Sander; Christian Drosten; Sascha Treskatsch; Pawel Durek; Andrey Kruglov; Andreas Radbruch; Mir-Farzin Mashreghi; Andreas Diefenbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Structural basis for translational shutdown and immune evasion by the Nsp1 protein of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Matthias Thoms; Robert Buschauer; Michael Ameismeier; Lennart Koepke; Timo Denk; Maximilian Hirschenberger; Hanna Kratzat; Manuel Hayn; Timur Mackens-Kiani; Jingdong Cheng; Jan H Straub; Christina M Stürzel; Thomas Fröhlich; Otto Berninghausen; Thomas Becker; Frank Kirchhoff; Konstantin M J Sparrer; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 encodes for an HLA-E-stabilizing peptide that abrogates inhibition of NKG2A-expressing NK cells.

Authors:  Quirin Hammer; Josefine Dunst; Wanda Christ; Francesca Picarazzi; Mareike Wendorff; Pouria Momayyezi; Oisín Huhn; Herman K Netskar; Kimia T Maleki; Marina García; Takuya Sekine; Ebba Sohlberg; Valerio Azzimato; Myriam Aouadi; Frauke Degenhardt; Andre Franke; Francesco Spallotta; Mattia Mori; Jakob Michaëlsson; Niklas K Björkström; Timo Rückert; Chiara Romagnani; Amir Horowitz; Jonas Klingström; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Karl-Johan Malmberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  SARS-CoV-2 host-shutoff impacts innate NK cell functions, but antibody-dependent NK activity is strongly activated through non-spike antibodies.

Authors:  Ceri Alan Fielding; Pragati Sabberwal; James C Williamson; Edward J D Greenwood; Thomas W M Crozier; Wioleta Zelek; Jeffrey Seow; Carl Graham; Isabella Huettner; Jonathan D Edgeworth; David A Price; Paul B Morgan; Kristin Ladell; Matthias Eberl; Ian R Humphreys; Blair Merrick; Katie Doores; Sam J Wilson; Paul J Lehner; Eddie C Y Wang; Richard J Stanton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  Natural killer cells in antiviral immunity.

Authors:  Niklas K Björkström; Benedikt Strunz; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 53.106

8.  Translational shutdown and evasion of the innate immune response by SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 protein.

Authors:  Jack Chun-Chieh Hsu; Maudry Laurent-Rolle; Joanna B Pawlak; Craig B Wilen; Peter Cresswell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.