| Literature DB >> 35761832 |
Brian H M Sit1, Kathy Hiu Laam Po1, Yuk-Yam Cheung1, Alan K L Tsang1, Patricia K L Leung1, J Zheng1, Alison Y T Lam1, Edman T K Lam1, Ken H L Ng1, Rickjason C W Chan1.
Abstract
Objectives: The World Health Organization (WHO) had designated the SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.529 as the new Variant of Concern Omicron (VOC-Omicron) on 26th November 20211. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) tests were widely employed to detect SARS-CoV-2 and its variant. Yet, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection performance of commercial real-time RT-PCR platforms and SARS-CoV-2 spike SNP assays remain to be elucidated.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Limit of Detection; Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35761832 PMCID: PMC9213017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Virol Plus ISSN: 2667-0380
Comparison of detection limit of three commercial sample-to-answer platforms and the conventional real-time RT-PCR assays.
| PHLSB in-house assay | TIB MOLBIOL E-gene | Cobas 6800/8800 cobas® SARS-CoV-2 Test | GeneXpert Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 | Liat cobas® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B Assay | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omicron variant | 2.35 | 2.35 | 1.35 | 2.35 | 1.35 |
| Qnostics SARS-CoV-2 Analytical Q Panel 01 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
The SARS-CoV-2 viral concentrations of tested specimens were quantified by a standard curve-based method established using the Qnostics SARS-CoV-2 Analytical Q Panel 01 (RANDOX, UK) and the PHLSB in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay; ND: Not Detected.
Test in triplicate.
Sensitivity and specificity of TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike SNP assays with reference to whole genome sequencing.
| 44 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 15 | 100% | 100% | ||||
| 44 | 28 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 15 | 96.6% (28/29) | 100% (15/15) | ||||
| 41 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 12 | 100% (7/7) | 100% (34/34) | |
| 41 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 17 | 31 | 10 | 25.8% (8/31) | 100% (10/10) | ||||
Abbreviations: Ab Tm, number of samples with aberrant melting temperature; No Tm, number of samples dropped out with no melting peak nor temperature; WGS, whole genome sequencing.
Beta variant with PHLSB in-house real-time RT-PCR Cp 34.19 (n = 1).
Omicron variant with PHLSB in-house real-time RT-PCR Cp 37.56 (n = 1).
Omicron variant (n = 22).
Omicron variant (n = 6).
Omicron variant (n = 16). Remark:, * no amplification signal nor melting peak was observed, these were probably due to low SARS-CoV-2 viral concentration in the specimens.
Fig. 1Representative melting peaks of TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P (Fig. 1A) and VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484A (Fig.1B) assays (1A) Correct melting peaks with Tm between 60-64°C were observed when Omicron specimens were tested with VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike S371L/S373P assay. (1B) Correct melting peaks with Tm >55°C were observed when Omicron specimens were tested with VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike E484A assay.
Fig. 2Representative melting peaks of TIB MOLBIOL VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike Spike E484K (Fig. 2A) and VirSNiP SARS-CoV-2 Spike N501Y (Fig.2B) assays (2A) An aberrant melting peak with Tm between 42-44°C was observed when Omicron specimen was tested. The shift of melting temperature of VOC-Omicron may possibly be due to the presence of E484A mutation. (2B) An ambiguous melting peak indicated by blue arrow with Tm within 54-55°C.