| Literature DB >> 35761198 |
Saisai Yang1, Guanghui Yao1, Xin Chen1, Huirong Shi1, Chihhong Lou2, Shumin Ren1, Zhihui Jiao1, Cong Wang1, Xiangdong Kong1, Qinghua Wu3.
Abstract
Nephrolithiasis is not common in children, but the incidence is gradually increased in these years. Urinary tract malformations, urinary infection, dietary habits, geographic region and genetic factor are involved in the etiology of nephrolithiasis. For the affected child, it is especially important to elucidate the etiology, which may provide an accurate diagnosis, a personalized therapy and effective follow-up strategy. Here to seek the etiology of a ten-year-old boy incidentally found with nephrolithiasis, next generation sequencing (NGS) including a panel with 248 genes involved in hereditary kidney diseases was performed for the boy and identified two mutations of KCNJ1, c.89G > A (p.C30Y) and c.65G > T (p.R22M), and the later was a novel missense mutation originated from his father. The child was confirmed with type II Bartter syndrome (BS) caused by KCNJ1 mutations. Our study suggests that BS may be difficult to get diagnosed at an early stage based on clinical manifestations or biochemical laboratory tests, and NGS is an efficient way to determine the etiology and provide further treatment and guide fertility counseling for the affected family.Entities:
Keywords: Bartter syndrome; KCNJ1; Nephrolithiasis; Next generation sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35761198 PMCID: PMC9235087 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02783-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.585
Primers used for pcr amplification of kcnj1
| Primer | Primer sequence | Location | Mutation site | Fragment size (bp) | SIFT | Polyphen-2 | MutationTaster | REF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | CGCTACTGCATACCACAGGAG | Exon 4 | c.89G > A | 400 | 0 | 0.999 | 1 | Schulte et al. 1999 |
| R | TGCCAAATGATTAGTAACCCAG | c.65G > T | 0 | 0.998 | 1 | Novel |
Fig. 1The urinary ultrasound showed enhanced echo of bilateral renal collecting system
Fig. 2Direct sequencing results of KCNJ1. Compound mutations c.65G > T and c.89G > A in KCNJ1 gene (NM_153767) in the proband (a), originated form his father and mother. The sites as normal control were shown in (b)
Fig. 3Phylogenetic comparison of protein encoded by KCNJ 1 across species
Fig. 4Homology modeling of wild-type and mutant KCNJ 1 variants. A Modeled structure of the ROMK protein; B Neighboring residues of Arg22 in the wild type of KCNJ1. Arg22 is shown in green; C Neighboring residues of Met22 in mutant KCNJ 1. Met22 is shown in yellow. D Neighboring residues of Cys30 in the wild type of KCNJ1. Cys30 is shown in white; E Neighboring residues of Tyr30 in mutant KCNJ1. Tyr30 is shown in magenta. Predicted H bonds are indicated by yellow dashed lines
Fig. 5Structural model of ROMK1 channel protein and the position of the two variants identified in this study shown in red, the variants of ROMK1 detected in ref. [7]
in green