Literature DB >> 35760879

Blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gustavo C Medeiros1,2, Todd D Gould2,3,4, William L Prueitt5, Julie Nanavati6, Michael F Grunebaum7, Nuri B Farber8, Balwinder Singh9, Sudhakar Selvaraj10, Rodrigo Machado-Vieira10, Eric D Achtyes11,12, Sagar V Parikh13, Mark A Frye9, Carlos A Zarate14, Fernando S Goes15.   

Abstract

(R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and its enantiomer (S)-ketamine (esketamine) can produce rapid and substantial antidepressant effects. However, individual response to ketamine/esketamine is variable, and there are no well-accepted methods to differentiate persons who are more likely to benefit. Numerous potential peripheral biomarkers have been reported, but their current utility is unclear. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis examining the association between baseline levels and longitudinal changes in blood-based biomarkers, and response to ketamine/esketamine. Of the 5611 citations identified, 56 manuscripts were included (N = 2801 participants), and 26 were compatible with meta-analytical calculations. Random-effect models were used, and effect sizes were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD). Our assessments revealed that more than 460 individual biomarkers were examined. Frequently studied groups included neurotrophic factors (n = 15), levels of ketamine and ketamine metabolites (n = 13), and inflammatory markers (n = 12). There were no consistent associations between baseline levels of blood-based biomarkers, and response to ketamine. However, in a longitudinal analysis, ketamine responders had statistically significant increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) when compared to pre-treatment levels (SMD [95% CI] = 0.26 [0.03, 0.48], p = 0.02), whereas non-responders showed no significant changes in BDNF levels (SMD [95% CI] = 0.05 [-0.19, 0.28], p = 0.70). There was no consistent evidence to support any additional longitudinal biomarkers. Findings were inconclusive for esketamine due to the small number of studies (n = 2). Despite a diverse and substantial literature, there is limited evidence that blood-based biomarkers are associated with response to ketamine, and no current evidence of clinical utility.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35760879     DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01652-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   15.992


  91 in total

1.  Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; Grayson Norquist; Robert H Howland; Barry Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Panos Zanos; Ruin Moaddel; Patrick J Morris; Lace M Riggs; Jaclyn N Highland; Polymnia Georgiou; Edna F R Pereira; Edson X Albuquerque; Craig J Thomas; Carlos A Zarate; Todd D Gould
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Toshi A Furukawa; Georgia Salanti; Anna Chaimani; Lauren Z Atkinson; Yusuke Ogawa; Stefan Leucht; Henricus G Ruhe; Erick H Turner; Julian P T Higgins; Matthias Egger; Nozomi Takeshima; Yu Hayasaka; Hissei Imai; Kiyomi Shinohara; Aran Tajika; John P A Ioannidis; John R Geddes
Journal:  Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ)       Date:  2018-10-18

Review 4.  Delayed pharmacological effects of antidepressants.

Authors:  A Frazer; S Benmansour
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  Combining medications to enhance depression outcomes (CO-MED): acute and long-term outcomes of a single-blind randomized study.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Jonathan W Stewart; Andrew A Nierenberg; Maurizio Fava; Benji T Kurian; Diane Warden; David W Morris; James F Luther; Mustafa M Husain; Ian A Cook; Richard C Shelton; Ira M Lesser; Susan G Kornstein; Stephen R Wisniewski
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 6.  Monoaminergic neurotransmission: the history of the discovery of antidepressants from 1950s until today.

Authors:  Francisco López-Muñoz; Cecilio Alamo
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults.

Authors:  Michael E Thase; Atul R Mahableshwarkar; Marianne Dragheim; Henrik Loft; Eduard Vieta
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 8.  Rapid onset of antidepressant action: a new paradigm in the research and treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Giacomo Salvadore; David A Luckenbaugh; Husseini K Manji; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 9.  Ketamine: 50 Years of Modulating the Mind.

Authors:  Linda Li; Phillip E Vlisides
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Bipolar depression: a major unsolved challenge.

Authors:  Ross J Baldessarini; Gustavo H Vázquez; Leonardo Tondo
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2020-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.