Literature DB >> 27139079

A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults.

Michael E Thase1, Atul R Mahableshwarkar2, Marianne Dragheim3, Henrik Loft3, Eduard Vieta4.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of vortioxetine, an antidepressant approved for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD), was studied in 11 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 6/8 weeks׳ treatment duration. An aggregated study-level meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the magnitude and dose-relationship of the clinical effect of approved doses of vortioxetine (5-20mg/day). The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to endpoint in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Differences from placebo were analyzed using mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) analysis, with a sensitivity analysis also conducted using last observation carried forward. Secondary outcomes included MADRS single-item scores, response rate (≥50% reduction in baseline MADRS), remission rate (MADRS ≤10), and Clinical Global Impressions scores. Across the 11 studies, 1824 patients were treated with placebo and 3304 with vortioxetine (5mg/day: n=1001; 10mg/day: n=1042; 15mg/day: n=449; 20mg/day: n=812). The MMRM meta-analysis demonstrated that vortioxetine 5, 10, and 20mg/day were associated with significant reductions in MADRS total score (Δ-2.27, Δ-3.57, and Δ-4.57, respectively; p<0.01) versus placebo. The effects of 15mg/day (Δ-2.60; p=0.105) were not significantly different from placebo. Vortioxetine 10 and 20mg/day were associated with significant reductions in 9 of 10 MADRS single-item scores. Vortioxetine treatment was also associated with significantly higher rates of response and remission and with significant improvements in other depression-related scores versus placebo. This meta-analysis of vortioxetine (5-20mg/day) in adults with MDD supports the efficacy demonstrated in the individual studies, with treatment effect increasing with dose.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical efficacy; Drug dose–response relationship; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Vortioxetine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27139079     DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 0924-977X            Impact factor:   4.600


  36 in total

1.  Comment on Fu, J. and Chen, Y.: The efficacy and safety of 5 mg/d vortioxetine compared to placebo for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eduardo C Humes; Andre R Brunoni
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo C Medeiros; Todd D Gould; William L Prueitt; Julie Nanavati; Michael F Grunebaum; Nuri B Farber; Balwinder Singh; Sudhakar Selvaraj; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Eric D Achtyes; Sagar V Parikh; Mark A Frye; Carlos A Zarate; Fernando S Goes
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 15.992

3.  Vortioxetine liposomes as a novel alternative to improve drug stability under stress conditions: toxicity studies and evaluation of antidepressant-like effect.

Authors:  Caroline Hermann Nodari; Natália Dalanhol De Quadros; Raquel Chiarentin; Francini Pereira Da Silva; Fernando Dal Pont Morisso; Mariele Feiffer Charão; Juliane Deise Fleck; Cristiane Bastos De Mattos; Andresa Heemann Betti; Simone Gasparin Verza
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  Vortioxetine for depression in adults.

Authors:  Markus Koesters; Giovanni Ostuzzi; Giuseppe Guaiana; Johanna Breilmann; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-05

Review 5.  The role of new antidepressants in clinical practice in Canada: a brief review of vortioxetine, levomilnacipran ER, and vilazodone.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Shortened Spadin Analogs Display Better TREK-1 Inhibition, In Vivo Stability and Antidepressant Activity.

Authors:  Alaeddine Djillani; Mariel Pietri; Sébastien Moreno; Catherine Heurteaux; Jean Mazella; Marc Borsotto
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  A 6-Month Open-Label Extension Study of Vortioxetine in Pediatric Patients with Depressive or Anxiety Disorders.

Authors:  Robert L Findling; Adelaide S Robb; Melissa P DelBello; Michael Huss; Nora K McNamara; Elias H Sarkis; Russell E Scheffer; Lis H Poulsen; Grace Chen; Ole M Lemming; Philippe Auby
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.576

8.  A randomised cross-over study assessing the "blue pyjama syndrome" in major depressive episode.

Authors:  Hélèna Delmas; Jean-Marie Batail; Bruno Falissard; Gabriel Robert; Maxence Rangé; Stéphane Brousse; Jacques Soulabaille; Dominique Drapier; Florian Naudet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  New drugs in psychiatry: focus on new pharmacological targets.

Authors:  Filippo Caraci; Gian Marco Leggio; Salvatore Salomone; Filippo Drago
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-03-30

10.  Factors associated with failure to achieve remission and with relapse after remission in patients with major depressive disorder in the PERFORM study.

Authors:  Delphine Saragoussi; Maëlys Touya; Josep Maria Haro; Bengt Jönsson; Martin Knapp; Bastien Botrel; Ioana Florea; Henrik Loft; Benoît Rive
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.