| Literature DB >> 35759964 |
Anup Das1, Subhash Babu2, M Datta1, Sanjeev Kumar3, Raghavendra Singh4, Ravikant Avasthe5, S S Rathore6, S K Yadav7, Vinod K Singh8.
Abstract
Soil carbon (C) loss is the prime sign of land degradation, and C pools have a great impact on soil quality and climate change mitigation. Hence, a field experiment was conducted for three consecutive years to assess the impact of crop intensification and conservation tillage practices on changes in the C pool at different soil depths of marginal land of the Indian Himalayas. The experiment consisted of two intensified cropping systems viz., CS1-Summer maize (Zea mays L.) -rainy season maize-lentil (Lens esculenta L.) and CS2-Summer maize-rainy season maize-mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern) and five tillage practices viz., No-till (NT); NT + live mulch of cowpea (NT + LMC); reduced tillage (RT); RT + LMC and conventional tillage (CT). Results revealed that CS2 produced significantly higher biomass, C retention efficiency (9.85%), and sequestrated greater C (0.42 Mg ha-1 yr-1) in the soil system than CS1. Of the various tillage practices, RT + LMC registered higher biomass and recycled greater biomass and C than those under other tillage practices. However, the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) content (7.03 g kg-1) and pool (9.62 Mg ha-1) in 0-10 cm depth were observed under NT + LMC. The non-labile C pool size under NT in 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm depths was significantly greater than those under CT. The NT + LMC sequestrated significantly higher SOC (0.57 Mg ha-1 yr-1) than other tillage practices. Thus, the study indicated that the adoption of an intensified maize-based system under RT + LMC or NT + LMC would increase SOC storage and C sequestration in marginal lands of the Indian Himalayas.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon pools; Carbon retention efficiency; Cowpea live mulching; No-Till
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35759964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Manage ISSN: 0301-4797 Impact factor: 8.910