| Literature DB >> 35758399 |
Yonghua Xiang1, Yinghui Peng2, Jun Qiu3, Qing Gan1, Ke Jin1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study aims to compare the differences between obstructed and unobstructed total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) using echocardiography, and to evaluate the clinical and echocardiographic parameters associated with pulmonary venous obstruction (PVO).We conducted a retrospective study of 70 patients with TAPVC between 2014 and 2019. The morphologic and hemodynamic echocardiographic parameters of patients were observed and measured, and the parameters between obstructed and unobstructed TAPVC were compared. The clinical and echocardiographic parameter differences between the two groups were used for ROC curve analysis.Obstructed TAPVC was found in 30 (42.9%) of 70 patients. Between obstructed and unobstructed TAPVC, there were significant differences in atrial septal defect size, pulmonary artery maximum velocity (PA Vmax ), peak E velocity of mitral valve, left ventricular fractional shortening, left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume and the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus, but there was no significant difference in birth weight. The first diagnosis age of obstructed TAPVC was earlier than unobstructed type. The ROC curve analysis for the first diagnosis age showed the sensitivity and specificity were 76.7%, 80% respectively. The ROC curve analysis for the PA Vmax showed the sensitivity and specificity were 88.5%, 67.6% respectively.Patients with TAPVC had a high incidence of PVO. The presence of PVO can affect the size of atrial septal defect and the closure of the ductus arteriosus, cause significant changes in PA Vmax, peak E velocity of mitral valve, left ventricular fractional shortening, left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume, lead to earlier symptoms and earlier first diagnosis age. The first diagnosis age and PA Vmax were excellent values since they associated with PVO.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35758399 PMCID: PMC9276072 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Comparison of the first diagnosis age between obstructed and unobstructed TAPVC.
| Diagnosis age | |||||
| Groups | N | Neonatal (≤28days) | Non neonatal (>28days) | χ2 ( | OR |
| Obstructed | 30 | 24 (80.0%) | 6 (20.0%) | 15.52 (.000) | 2.46 |
| Unobstructed | 40 | 13 (32.5%) | 27 (67.5%) | ||
| Total | 70 | 37 | 33 | ||
OR = odds ratio.
Comparison of the echocardiographic parameters between obstructed and unobstructed TAPVC.
| TAPVC (mean ± SD) | |||||
| Variables | N | obstructed | unobstructed | T test (or χ2) | |
| PA/AA | 69 | 1.70 ± 0.24 | 1.57 ± 0.29 | 1.979 | .052 |
| RD/LD | 67 | 1.55 ± 0.36 | 1.63 ± 0.36 | −0.947 | .347 |
| RT/LT | 69 | 1.55 ± 0.45 | 1.41 ± 0.34 | 1.402 | .167 |
| ASD (mm) | 69 | 7.21 ± 1.91 | 9.98 ± 4.37 | −3.192 | .002 |
| PA Vmax (m/s) | 63 | 0.89 ± 0.32 | 1.68 ± 1.08 | −3.597 | .001 |
| AA Vmax (m/s) | 63 | 0.87 ± 0.19 | 0.96 ± 0.18 | −1.941 | .057 |
| MV VE (m/s) | 63 | 0.92 ± 0.16 | 1.01 ± 0.13 | −2.366 | .022 |
| LVFS (%) | 63 | 42.3 ± 10.0 | 36.1 ± 7.1 | 2.749 | .008 |
| LVEF (%) | 63 | 76.1 ± 10.1 | 68.8 ± 9.2 | 2.85 | .006 |
| SV (ml) | 63 | 2.97 ± 1.63 | 5.67 ± 3.96 | −3.147 | .003 |
| Presence of PDA (n, %) | 70 | 21 (70%) | 10 (25%) | 14.07∗ | .000 |
Chi-Square test.
AA Vmax = ascending aorta maximum velocity, ASD = atrial septal defect, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, LVFS = left ventricular fractional shortening, MV VE = Peak E velocity of mitral valve, PA Vmax = pulmonary artery maximum velocity, PA/AA = the ratio of diameter of pulmonary artery/ascending aorta, PDA = patent ductus arteriosus, RD/LD = the ratio of right /left ventricular inner diameter, RT/LT = the ratio of right/left ventricular wall thickness, SV = stroke volume, TAPVC = total anomalous pulmonary venous connection.
The ROC curve analysis of the clinical and echocardiographic parameters associated with PVO.
| Predictors | Cut-off points | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Areas un-der curve | 95% CI | |
| ASD (mm) | 8.85∗ | 82.8 | 55.0 | 0.707 | 0.584–0.830 | .003 |
| PDA (exist = 1) | 1 | 70.0 | 75.0 | 0.725 | 0.602–0.848 | .001 |
| PA Vmax (m/s) | 1.11∗ | 88.5 | 67.6 | 0.841 | 0.744–0.939 | .000 |
| LVFS (%) | 40.5♯ | 54.2 | 78.8 | 0.658 | 0.509–0.808 | .043 |
| LVEF (%) | 75.5♯ | 54.2 | 78.8 | 0.668 | 0.520–0.816 | .032 |
| SV(ml) | 3.1∗ | 70.8 | 75.8 | 0.751 | 0.622–0.879 | .001 |
| MV VE (m/s) | 0.925∗ | 51.9 | 82.9 | 0.671 | 0.532–0.831 | .021 |
| Diagnosis age (mo) | 0.64∗ | 76.7 | 80.0 | 0.805 | 0.698–0.912 | .000 |
CI = confidence interval, ROC = receiver operating characteristic, PVO = pulmonary venous obstruction.
Smaller parameters represent more definitive test.
Larger parameters represent more definitive test; Mon, months.
ASD = atrial septal defect, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, LVFS = left ventricular fractional shortening, MV VE = Peak E velocity of mitral valve, PA Vmax = pulmonary artery maximum velocity, PDA = patent ductus arteriosus, PVO = pulmonary venous obstruction, SV = stroke volume.
Figure 1The ROC curve analysis for the first diagnosis age; the area under the curve was 0.805; the sensitivity was 76.7% and the specificity was 80% at the optimal cut-off value of 0.64 months. Smaller parameters represent more definitive test.
Figure 2The ROC curve analysis for the PA Vmax; the area under the curve was 0.841; the sensitivity was 88.5% and the specificity was 67.6% at the optimal cut-off value of 1.11m/s. Smaller parameters represent more definitive test.