| Literature DB >> 35757273 |
Rui Xiong1, Ni Wang1, JingXuan He1.
Abstract
Objective: To study the effects of mind mapping combined with microvideo explanation on disease perception control and nursing cooperation during membrane induction therapy in patients with infectious nonunion after tibial trauma.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35757273 PMCID: PMC9232346 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4439595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Med Int ISSN: 2090-2840 Impact factor: 1.621
Figure 1Schematic diagram of mind mapping of infectious nonunion after tibial trauma
Comparison of B-IPQ scores between the two groups of patients ( ± s, points).
| Group |
| Life impact | Duration | Self-control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| Observation | 15 | 8.07 ± 1.62 | 3.87 ± 0.92 | 7.60 ± 1.40 | 3.20 ± 1.01 | 4.80 ± 1.32 | 6.80 ± 1.21 |
| Control | 15 | 7.33 ± 1.80 | 5.27 ± 0.88 | 8.27 ± 1.22 | 4.67 ± 1.05 | 4.73 ± 1.44 | 5.00 ± 1.07 |
|
| 1.172 | 4.261 | 1.387 | 3.898 | 0.132 | 4.323 | |
|
| 0.251 | <0.001 | 0.176 | 0.001 | 0.896 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||||
| Group |
| Treatment control | Symptoms | Attention | |||
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| Observation | 15 | 7.20 ± 1.08 | 7.87 ± 1.41 | 7.07 ± 1.10 | 5.93 ± 01.22 | 7.00 ± 0.76 | 7.40 ± 0.83 |
| Control | 15 | 6.87 ± 1.13 | 7.40 ± 1.24 | 7.27 ± 0.96 | 5.80 ± 1.01 | 7.20 ± 1.52 | 7.20 ± 0.94 |
|
| 0.827 | 0.963 | 0.530 | 0.325 | 0.456 | 0.618 | |
|
| 0.415 | 0.344 | 0.600 | 0.748 | 0.652 | 0.542 | |
|
| |||||||
| Group |
| Disease awareness | Emotion | Total points | |||
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| Observation | 15 | 4.07 ± 1.49 | 7.27 ± 0.70 | 7.33 ± 0.90 | 3.93 ± 0.59 | 52.13 ± 8.94 | 21.60 ± 2.69 |
| Control | 15 | 4.33 ± 0.82 | 5.93 ± 0.70 | 7.07 ± 1.22 | 4.93 ± 0.80 | 51.47 ± 12.48 | 26.00 ± 5.03 |
|
| 0.609 | 5.189 | 0.680 | 3.892 | 0.168 | 2.987 | |
|
| 0.547 | <0.001 | 0.502 | 0.001 | 0.868 | 0.006 | |
Comparison of nursing cooperation between the two groups of patients (n (%)).
| Group |
| Compliance | Basic compliance | Noncompliance | Overall compliance rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 15 | 12 (80.00) | 3 (20.00) | 0 (0.00) | 15 (100.00) |
| Control | 15 | 4 (26.67) | 10 (66.67) | 1 (6.67) | 14 (93.33) |
|
| 1.034 | ||||
|
| 0.309 |
Comparison of ESCA scores between the two groups of patients ( ± s, points).
| Group |
| Self-concept (0∼36 points) | Self-responsibility (0∼32 points) | Self-care skill (0∼48 points) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||
| Observation | 15 | 18.87 ± 3.62 | 28.47 ± 3.94 | 20.07 ± 2.99 | 27.20 ± 4.96 | 18.53 ± 4.67 | 37.47 ± 5.83 |
| Control | 15 | 18.47 ± 3.66 | 23.67 ± 4.22 | 17.80 ± 5.54 | 22..00 ± 3.19 | 19.40 ± 6.12 | 28.67 ± 5.04 |
|
| 0.301 | 3.219 | 1.394 | 3.284 | 0.436 | 4.242 | |
|
| 0.766 | 0.003 | 0.174 | 0.003 | 0.666 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||||
| Group |
| Health knowledge level (0∼56 points) | Total score (0∼172 points) | ||||
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | ||||
| Observation | 15 | 28.87 ± 3.64 | 44.87 ± 4.87 | 96.40 ± 17.56 | 121.47 ± 10.41 | ||
| Control | 15 | 27.73 ± 4.08 | 38.87 ± 4.22 | 100.87 ± 13.74 | 105.40 ± 8.63 | ||
|
| 0.803 | 3.606 | 0.776 | 4.600 | |||
|
| 0.429 | 0.001 | 0.444 | <0.001 | |||