Literature DB >> 28844964

Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models.

Aiah A El-Rashidy1, Judith A Roether2, Leila Harhaus3, Ulrich Kneser3, Aldo R Boccaccini4.   

Abstract

Large bone defects resulting from fractures and disease are a medical concern, being often unable to heal spontaneously by the body's repair mechanisms. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is a promising approach for treating bone defects through providing a template to guide osseous regeneration. 3D scaffolds with microstructure mimicking host bone are necessary in common BTE strategies. Bioactive glasses (BGs) attract researchers' attention as BTE scaffolds as they are osteoconductive and osteoinductive in certain formulations. In vivo animal models allow understanding and evaluation of materials' performance in the complex physiological environment, being an inevitable step before clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to review for the first time published research investigating the in vivo osseous regenerative capacity of 3D BG scaffolds in bone defect animal models, to better understand and evaluate the progress and future outlook of the use of such scaffolds in BTE. The literature analysis reveals that the regenerative capacity of BG scaffolds depends on several factors; including BG composition, fabrication method, scaffold microstructure and pore characteristics, in addition to scaffold pretreatment and whether or not the scaffolds are loaded with growth factors. In addition, animal species selected, defect size and implantation time affect the scaffold in vivo behavior and outcomes. The review of the literature also makes clear the difficulty encountered to compare different types of bioactive glass scaffolds in their bone forming ability. Even considering such limitations of the current state-of-the-art, results generated from animal bone defect models provide an essential source of information to guide the design of BG scaffolds in future. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Bioactive glasses are at the centre of increasing research efforts in bone tissue engineering as the number of research groups around the world carrying out research on this type of biomaterials continues to increase. However, there are no previous reviews in literature which specifically cover investigations of the performance of bioactive glass scaffolds in bone defect animal models. This is the topic of the present review, in which we have analysed comprehensively all available literature in the field. The review thus fills a gap in the biomaterials literature providing a broad platform of information for researchers interested in bioactive glasses in general and specifically in the outcomes of in vivo models. Bioactive glass scaffolds of different compositions tested in relevant bone defect models are covered.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D scaffolds; Animal model; Bioactive glass; Bone defects; Bone regeneration; In vivo

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844964     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  81 in total

1.  Chitosan/gelatin scaffolds support bone regeneration.

Authors:  Anthie Georgopoulou; Fotios Papadogiannis; Aristea Batsali; John Marakis; Kalliopi Alpantaki; Aristides G Eliopoulos; Charalampos Pontikoglou; Maria Chatzinikolaidou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The efficiency of internal fixation with bone grafting at docking sites after bone transport for treatment of large segmental tibial bone defects.

Authors:  Maimaiti Xiayimaierdan; Jinyong Huang; Chenchen Fan; Feiyu Cai; Yusupu Aihemaitijiang; Zengru Xie
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Urine-derived stem cells: applications in skin, bone and articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Wenqian Zhang; Jungen Hu; Yizhou Huang; Chenyu Wu; Huiqi Xie
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 5.  Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Enzhe Zhao; Guan Li; Hongsen Bi; Zhenmin Zhao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  [Application and research status of bioactive glass in bone repair].

Authors:  Yonghua Huang; Li Li; Zhanying Shi; Xu Cui; Haobo Pan; Bing Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

7.  Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Facilitate Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation Within Sagittal Suture During Expansion in Rats.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Pengbing Ding; Guan Li; Enhang Lu; Zhenmin Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Silver-doped bioactive glass particles for in vivo bone tissue regeneration and enhanced methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inhibition.

Authors:  Natalia Pajares-Chamorro; Yadav Wagley; Chima V Maduka; Daniel W Youngstrom; Alyssa Yeger; Stephen F Badylak; Neal D Hammer; Kurt Hankenson; Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Sol-Gel Synthesis, in vitro Behavior, and Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Proliferation of Bioactive Glass 58S.

Authors:  Majid Rastegar Ramsheh; Aliasghar Behnamghader; Ali Khanlarkhani
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 10.  Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential?

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Sara Ciavattini; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.