Literature DB >> 35756964

Novel switchable ECF sigma factor transcription system for improving thaxtomin A production in Streptomyces.

Xuejin Zhao1,2, Weijia Wei1,3, Yeqing Zong1,3, Chaoxian Bai1, Xian Guo1,3, Hua Zhu4, Chunbo Lou4,3.   

Abstract

The application of the valuable natural product thaxtomin A, a potent bioherbicide from the potato scab pathogenic Streptomyces strains, has been greatly hindered by the low yields from its native producers. Here, we developed an orthogonal transcription system, leveraging extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma (σ) factor 17 (ECF17) and its cognate promoter Pecf17, to express the thaxtomin gene cluster and improve the production of thaxtomin A. The minimal Pecf17 promoter was determined, and a Pecf17 promoter library with a wide range of strengths was constructed. Furthermore, a cumate inducible system was developed for precise temporal control of the ECF17 transcription system in S. venezuelae ISP5230. Theoretically, the switchable ECF17 transcription system could reduce the unwanted influences from host and alleviate the burdens introduced by overexpression of heterologous genes. The yield of thaxtomin A was significantly improved to 202.1 ± 15.3  μ g/mL using the switchable ECF17 transcription system for heterologous expression of the thaxtomin gene cluster in S. venezuelae ISP5230. Besides, the applicability of this transcription system was also tested in Streptomyces albus J1074, and the titer of thaxtomin A was raised to as high as 239.3 ± 30.6 μg/mL. Therefore, the inducible ECF17 transcription system could serve as a complement of the generally used transcription systems based on strong native constitutive promoters and housekeeping σ factors for the heterologous expression of valuable products in diverse Streptomyces hosts.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECF17 sigma factor; Heterologous expression; Streptomyces; Thaxtomin A; Transcription system

Year:  2022        PMID: 35756964      PMCID: PMC9194655          DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol        ISSN: 2405-805X


Introduction

Thaxtomin A is a nitrated diketopiperazine bio-herbicide produced by the potato scab pathogens Streptomyces acidiscabies, Streptomyces scabies, and Streptomyces turgidiscabies [[1], [2], [3]]. Considering its attractive environmental compatibility and rapid degradation in natural environment, the US Environmental Protection Agency has approved thaxtomin A as key active constituent of bio-herbicides for sale for pre-and post-emergence weed control in 2012 [4]. Unfortunately, the low yields in the native producers of thaxtomins have greatly limited their applications in agriculture. Over the past years, efforts have been investigated on heterologous expression of thaxtomin gene cluster in different hosts to achieve overproduction of thaxtomin A and the highest reported yield has climbed to 168 mg/L [5], but still lag far behind the demand of industrialization. The most substantial issue is therefore design and construction of pathways lead to the optimal production of target metabolites.Synthetic biology tools enable the reconstruction of biosynthetic gene culsters in a predictable manner. As the first dedicated phase of gene expression, transcription frequently serves as the target for gene regulation. As such, promoter engineering has been widely used for strain improvement and metabolites elicitation. Various constitutive promoters, including ermEp [6], SF14p [7], kasOp* [8], and their derivatives, have already been used in the successful production of different natural products [9]. These constitutive promoters are generally controlled by housekeeping σ factors, e.g., the transcription initiations of SF14p and kasOp* are dependent on HrdB, a σ 70 regulates a large number of housekeeping genes involved in the primary metabolism of Streptomyces [10]. Competition with the essential endogenous genes for available σ factors would affect the maximum activities of those promoters [11], which is unfavorable for the high production of valuable products in most cases. Besides housekeeping σ factors, cells encode a number of alternative σ factors responsible for sensing intercellular and intracellular signals to maintain their homeostasis [12,13]. These σ factors are usually under tight control by corresponding anti-σ factor [14]. Group 4 alternative σ factors, also known as ECF σ factors, have the simplest structure with only σ4 and σ2 two domains. Upon activation, the two domains bind to the promoter's −35 and −10 regions separately and recruit RNA polymerase core enzyme to initiate transcription [15]. In general, ECF σ factors only regulate their cognate promoters because of the different promoter recognition and unwinding mechanisms [16]and the inefficient promoter melting ability [17]. It was believed that there is little cross-talk between the ECF σ factors and the endogenous housekeeping σ factor [[18], [19], [20], [21]], which makes ECF σ factors and their cognate promoters appropriate orthogonal candidates for engineering genetic switches to reduce the unwanted influences from Streptomyces hosts. In addition, constitutive high expression of heterologous genes might cause a growth burden to the host cells [22]. To achieve dynamic control of gene expression in Streptomyces, inducible promoters were usually employed. Besides the naturally occurring promoters like tipAp induced by thiostrepton [23], gylP induced by glycerol [24], nitAp induced by caprolactam [25], Potr* induced by oxytetracycline [26], and xylAp induced by d-xylose [27], there are several artificial inducible promoters constructed by combining constitutive promoters with repressors such as TetR [28], CymR [29] and RolR [29] that respond to anhydrotetracycline, cumate, and resorcinol, respectively. Generally, the artificial inducible promoters like the CymR-based promoters exhibited much better dynamic ranges and stringencies than the naturally occurring ones [30,31]. In this work, we first developed a heterologous transcription system based on the ECF17 σ factor and its cognate promoter Pecf17 in Streptomyces venezuelae ISP5230. A Pecf17 promoter library with a wide range of strengths was then constructed by minimizing the Pecf17 promoter and performing saturation mutations of the −35 region to −10 region sequence. The transcriptional activity of the strongest Pecf17 promoter mutant is approximately 12-fold higher than that of the constitutive strong kasOp* promoter. Further, we employed a cumate inducible system to switch off/on the expression of the ECF17 σ factor to realize temporal control of the ECF17 transcription system. Using the switchable ECF17 transcription system to refactor the thaxtomin gene cluster, the thaxtomin A yield was improved to 202.1 15.3 in S. venezuelae ISP5230 (Fig. 1). We also demonstrated the applicability of this system in another Streptomyces host, S. albus J1074, and gained a thaxtomin A yield as high as 239.3 ± 30.6 μg/mL.
Fig. 1

Overall scheme of the novel switchable ECF17 transcription system for improving thaxtomin A production.

Overall scheme of the novel switchable ECF17 transcription system for improving thaxtomin A production.

Materials and methods

Strains, media, and reagents

Strains and plasmids used in this study were listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli DH10B was used for molecular cloning and plasmid propagation. E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 [32] was used for E. coli-Streptomyces conjugation. E. coli strains were cultured in LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (50 mg/L apramycin, 50 mg/L hygromycin, 25 mg/L nalidixic acid). Streptomyces acidiscabies ATCC 49003 and S. albus J1074 [33] were grown on MS plates (20 g/L soybean flour, 20 g/L mannitol, and 20 g/L agar) for spore preparation. S. venezuelae ISP5230 was grown on MYM plates (4.2 g/L D-(+)-maltose monohydrate, 4 g/L yeast extract, 4 g/L malt extract, and 20 g/L agar) for spore preparation. For seed cultivation, S. venezuelae was grown in liquid MYM medium, while S. acidiscabies and S. albus were grown in TSB medium (30 g/L tryptic soy broth (BD)). For fermentation cultivation, S. venezuelae and S. acidiscabies were grown in oat bran broth (OBB) medium (20 g/L Oat, pH 7.2), and S. albus was grown in 0BB or B medium (5 g/L soluble starch, 2 g/L tryptone, 2 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L soybeans, 4 g/L NaCl, 0.5 g/L K2HPO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, and 2 g/L CaCO3). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer (8 g/L NaCl, 0.2 g/L KCl, 1.44 g/L Na2HPO4, and 0.24 g/L KH2PO4) and P10 buffer (sucrose 10.3%, K2SO4 1.43 mM, MgCl2 9.9 mM, KH2PO4 0.367 mM, CaCl2 25 mM, 2-(N-Morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, MES 10 mM) were used for protoplast preparation.
Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Strain or PlasmidRelevant genotypeReference or source
E.coli DH10BHost for molecular cloning and measurement of Pecf promoter activityThermo Scientific
E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002Donor strain for conjugation between E.coli and Streptomyces[32]
S. acidiscabies ATCC 49003Native thaxtomin A producerCGMCC 4.1789
S. venezuelae ISP5230Wild type, Streptomyces host strain for heterologous expressionATCC 10712
S.v/thaxpPAS-thax integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/thax-PEApPAS-thax-PEA integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/ECF17pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17 integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/ECF17::thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 and pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17 integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/ECF17-SwitchpTHS-CymR*-Switch integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S.v/ECF17-Switch::thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 and pTHS-CymR*-Switch integrated S. venezuelae ISP5230This study
S. albus J1074Wild type, Streptomyces host strain for heterologous expression[33]
S.a/thaxpPAS-thax integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/thax-PEApPAS-thax-PEA integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/ECF17pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17 integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/ECF17::thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 and pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17 integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/ECF17-SwitchpTHS-CymR*-Switch integrated S. albus J1074This study
S.a/ECF17-Switch::thax-Pecf17pPAS-thax-Pecf17 and pTHS-CymR*-Switch integrated S. albus J1074This study



pPAPshuttle vector, containg E.coli origin of replication, P15A, apramycin resistance, φ C31 integration systemThis study
pPAP-PTpPAP harboring sfgfp reporter geneThis study
pPAP-PecfxpPAP-PT harboring Pecfx promoter controlling the transcription initiation of sfgfp reporter gene (Pecfx: Pecf11_3726, Pecf11_987, Pecf16_3622, Pecf16_973, Pecf34_1384, Pecf27_4265, Pecf38_1322, Pecf17_1458)This study
pPAP-Pecf17pPAP-PT harboring Pecf17 promoter controlling the transcription initiation of sfgfp reporter geneThis study
pPAP-Pecf-No.pPAP-Pecf with truncated Pecf17 promoter (Pecf-No.: 130 bp, 105 bp, 85 bp, 65 bp, 55 bp, 45 bp, 35 bp, 25 bp, 20 bp, 15 bp, 10 bp, 5 bp, 0 bp)This study
pPAP-Pecf17-MpPAP-Pecf17 minimal promoter, and the mutated promoter sequence to construct promoter libraryThis study
pPAP-kasOp*pPAP-PT harboring kasOp* promoter for the transcription of sfgfp reporter gene, positive controlThis study
pTHSshuttle vector, containg E.coli origin of replication, pSC101, hygromycin resistance, TG1 integration systemThis study
pTHS-kasOp*-ECFxpTHS harboring ECF sigma factor (ECF11_3726, ECF11_987, ECF16_3622, ECF16_973, ECF34_1384, ECF27_4265, ECF38_1322, ECF17_1458)This study
pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17pTHS harboring ECF17 σ factorThis study
pTHS-CymRpTHS harboring CymR repressor, and a cumate-inducible hybrid PCymR* promoter controlling sfgfp expressionThis study
pTHS-CymR*pTHS harboring CymR* (CymR-CI434) repressor, and a cumate-inducible hybrid PCymR* promoter controlling sfgfp expressionThis study
pTHS-CymR*-SwitchxpTHS-CymR* with sfGFP reporter replaced by ECF17 σ factor with different RBSs (SR3:pTHS-CymR*-Switch 1; SR15: pTHS-CymR*-Switch 2; SR33:pTHS-CymR*-Switch 3, SR41: pTHS-CymR*-Switch 4)This study
pTHS-CymR*-SwitchpTHS-CymR* with SR33-ECF17 σ factor under the control of cumate-inducible PCymR* promoterThis study
pPASshuttle vector, containg E.coli origin of replication, pSC101, apramycin resistance, φ C31 integration systemThis study
pPAS-thaxpPAS harboring thaxtomin gene clusterThis study
pPAS-thax-PEApPAS harboring bidirectional PEA promoter refactored thaxtomin gene clusterThis study
pPAS-thax-Pecf17pPAS harboring bidirectional Pecf17 promoter refactored thaxtomin gene clusterThis study
Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Construction of the basic clone vectors

We built three shuttle vectors for the conjugation from E. coli into the S. venezulae and S. albus containing the cognate attB site for the convenience of molecular cloning. Each shuttle vector contains four separate modules, including E. coli origin of replication, a selectable antibiotic resistance cassette, the integrase and its corresponding attP site, RP4 origin of transfer (oriT) [34]. Further, each shuttle vector was designed to contain the BsaI restriction site for Golden gate assembly [35]. Specifically, the pTHS vector contains pSC101 origin of replication, hygromycin resistance, and TG1 integration system (TG1 integrase-) [36]; the pPAP-PT vector contains P15A origin of replication, apramycin resistance, and integration system ( −) [37], a ribozyme RiboJ [36], a RBS (BBa_B0034 (RBS, http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0034)) and the sfgfp reporter gene (Fig. S1A).

Functional analysis of ECF factor/Pecf pairs in Streptomyces

We used the pTHS plasmid to construct the ECFx plasmid. Specifically, the kasOp* promoter, rbs-100 ribosome binding site (RBS), codon-optimized ECF BsaI restriction sites were synthesized by the GenScript company, and assembled on the pTHS plasmid via Golden gate method to generate eight pTHS -ECFx plasmids (Fig. S1B). Pecf promoters (Table S1) synthesized by GenScript company were assembled on the pPAP-PT plasmid via Golden gate assembly to generate 8 pPAP-Pecfx plasmids. The kasOp* promoter was inserted directly in front of the RiboJ-BBa_B0034-sfgfp cassette of pPAP-PT to generate the pPAP-kasOp* plasmid as a positive control.

Construction of the Pecf17 promoter library

To identify the minimal Pecf17 promoter, the truncated versions of Pecf17 promoter were ordered from GenScript company, and inserted to the pPAP-PT plasmid via Golden gate assembly to generate varied pPAP-Pecf17-No. plasmids (Fig. S1C), here the No.130 bp, 105 bp, 85 bp, 65 bp, 55 bp, 45 bp, 35 bp, 25 bp, 20 bp, 15 bp, 10 bp, 5 bp, and 0 bp denote the DNA lengths upstream of the −35 region (TGAAC) (Table S1). After the minimal Pecf17 promoter was determined, a Pecf17 promoter library was constructered by saturation mutagenesis. Specifically, the −35 box was divided into two parts (5' -TGA and 5′-ACA); the −10 box was also divided into two parts (5′-CGT and 5′-AC); and the 15 bp spacer sequence between −35 box and −10 box was divided into five parts (5′-CG, 5′-CC, 5′-GCAC, 5′-TTCG, and 5′-GT) (Fig. S1D). A Pecf17 promoter library was then constructered by synthesizing degenerate primers (S1–F/R, S2–F/R, S3–F/R, S4–F/R, S5–F/R, S6–F/R, S7–F/R, S8–F/R, S9–F/R, respectively) (Table S2) containing 5′-NN(N)(N) to replace any of the regions mentioned above, and using overlap extension PCR to obtain the complete promoter sequences, which were then assembled on the pPAP-PT plasmid via Golden gate to generate a series of pPAP-Pecf17-M plasmids with different Pecf17 promoters (Fig. S1D).

Construction of the switchable ECF17 transcription system

The cumate inducible system containing a hybrid PCymR* promoter and a CymR* repressor was first constructed to realize temporal control in Streptomyces. The hybrid cumate-inducible PCymR* promoter was obtained by inserting two CymR operator binding sites (CuO) into the up- and down-stream of the SP43 constitutive promoter (Table S1, Fig. S2). The CymR* repressor was generated by fusing the CI434 oligomerization domain to the C-terminus of the CymR repressor as described [38], which was controlled by the SP08 promoter [39](Table S1). The PCymR* promoter, and the CymR* expression cassette together with RiboJ-BBa_B0034-sfgfp were inserted into the pTHS plasmid via Gibson assembly to generate pTHS-CymR*. As a control, we replaced the CymR* repressor with CymR to generate the pTHS-CymR plasmid. The cumate-inducible system was then used to control the expression of the ECF17 σ factor. We tested 4 different RBSs (SR3, SR15, SR33, and SR41) [39] (Table S1) to fine-tune the translation initiation rate [40] and the expression level of ECF17 σ factor, and the RigoJ-BBa_B0034-sfgfp sequence was replaced with the RBS-ECF17 sequence via Gibson assembly to generate pTHS-CymR*-switch-x. (SR3:pTHS-CymR*-Switch 1; SR15:pTHS-CymR*-Switch 2; SR33:pTHS-CymR*-Switch 3, SR41: pTHS-CymR*-Switch 4).

Reconstruction of the thaxtomin gene cluster with PEA or Pecf17 promoter

Two CRISPR/Cas9 target protospacer sequences were selected from txtE and txtA promoter regions in the thaxtomin A cluster. The DNA templates of sgRNA-txtE-F and sgRNA-txtA-R were generated via overlap extension of sgRNA-txtE/sgRNA-txtA, guide RNA-F plus guide RNA-R (Table S2), and sgRNA-txtE-F and sgRNA-txtA-R were transcribed in vitro with HiScribe™ T7 Quick High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit(NEB). Then, sgRNAs were purified using the RNApure Rapid RNA Kit (BioMed). The Cas9 expression and purification were performed following established protocols [41]. The exchanged bidirectional SP42-SP43 promoter PEA or the bidirectional Pecf17 promoter (combination of wild type Pecf17 with the minimal Pecf17 promoter) containing two ∼30 bp overlaps with the corresponding ends of the thaxtomin gene cluster were ordered from GenScript company (Table S1). The pPAS-thax plasmid [41] harboing the thaxtomin gene cluster from S. acidiscabies ATCC 49003 (∼10 μg) was digested with Cas9 guided by sgRNA-txtE-F and sgRNA-txtA-R at 37 °C for 2 h (Fig. S3). The digested DNA was then ethanol precipitated and resuspended in 20 μL DNase-free water. The exchanged bidirectional SP42-SP43 promoter PEA or the bidirectional Pecf17 promoter (combination of wild type Pecf17 with the minimal Pecf17 promoter) (Table S1) containing two ∼30 bp overlaps with the corresponding ends of the thaxtomin gene cluster was ligated separately with the recovered pPAS-thax fragments by Gibson assembly to generate the pPAS-thax-PEA and pPAS-thax-Pecf17 (Fig. S3). The correct clones were verified by colony PCR with p-PF and p-PR primers (Table S1).

Construction of the thaxtomin gene cluster expressing strains

The pPAS-thax plasmid was transferred into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002, and then conjugated into S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. albus J1074 to generate S.v/thax and S.a/thax, repsectively. The pPAS-thax-PEA plasmid was introduced into S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. albus J1074 by the same way to generate S.v/thax-PEA and S.a/thax-PEA, repsectively. S.v/ECF17 and S.a/ECF17 were constructed using the pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17 plasmid smilarly. The pPAS-thax-Pecf17 plasmid was conjugated into S.v/ECF and S.a/ECF to generate S.v/ECF17:thax-Pecf17 and S.a/ECF17:thax-Pecf17, repsectively. S.v/ECF17-Switch and S.a/ECF17-Switch were constructed by introducing the pTHS-CymR*-Switch plasmid into S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. albus J1074, repsectively. The pPAS-thax-Pecf17 plasmid was then conjugated into S.v/ECF17-Switch and S.a/ECF17-Switch to generate S.v/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 and S.a/ECF17:thax-Pecf17, repsectively.

Determination of cell growth and sfGFP expression using the multimode Varioskan LUX microplate reader

Spore suspensions of S. venezuelae strains were inoculated into 15 mL liquid MYM and incubated for 48 h as a seed culture, and 200 μL of seed cultures were transferred into 2 mL of MYM medium in 24 deep plate. Samples were taken and detected at different time points. The biomass was measured by OD600, and promoter activitie was monitored by Tecan Infinite 200 Pro plate reader (Thermo Scientific) with excitation at 485/9 nm and emission at 515/20 nm. The experiments were performed with three biological replicates.

Thaxtomin A production and HPLC analysis

S. venezuelae were cultured in MYM and S. albus strains were cultured in TSB medium at 30 °C for 48 h, and 2 mL of the resultant seed cultures were used to inoculate 50 mL of OBB or B medium in 250 mL flasks. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C, 250 rpm for 5 days. For thaxtomin A detection, 1 mL of fermentation broth was extracted with 10 mL of methanol, and the mycelium was removed by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm pore-size nylon membrane (JIN TENG) and subjected to an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (C18 column: 5 μm × 250 mm × 4.6 mm (Agilent); Mobile phase: acetonitrile: water (40:60), 1 mL/min; Detected at 380 nm). We purchased thaxtomin A standard from Sigma (catalog: SML1456) and established a calibration curve, the concentration of thaxtomin A was calculated based on their corresponding peak area under HPLC trace.

Confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy analysis of Streptomyces

Streptomyces strains were grown in 24 deep-well plates filled with 2 mL of appropriate liquid medium at 30 °C for 24–48 h. Mycelia from 1 mL liquid cultures were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. The pellets were washed twice with PBS buffer, and resuspended in the same buffer. Samples were examined under a leicaSP8 laser-scanning microscope (Leica) at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelengths of 500–550 nm.

Quantitation of sfGFP expression by flow cytometry

Quantitation of sfGFP expression in E. coli DH10B was performed as described [38]. A total of 50,000 events were recorded. Quantitation of sfGFP expression in Streptomyces was performed using a flow-cytometry-based method [39]. Broth culture (1 mL) containing the mycelia was collected by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min, washed by 10% (wt/vol) sucrose once, resuspended in 1 mL of the P10 buffer supplemented with 5 mg/mL of lysozyme, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to release protoplasts. The protoplasts were analyzed using a FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer (BD Company, USA) with a 488 nm excitation laser and an FL1 (530/30 nm bandpass filter) detector. A total of 50,000 events were recorded. The data were processed using BD FACSuite software and analyzed with FlowJo 9.3.2 software (TreeStar, Inc.). The fluorescence of each sample was recorded as the geometric mean of all of the measured cells and was normalized to the corresponding FSC value, to warrant that only cell size particles were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

To measure the Pecfx promoter activities and to identify the minimal Pecf17 promoter, we used ImageJ to process the fluorescence picture as follows: (i) select the whole fluorescent area and measure the “Integrated intensity”; (ii) select a region that has no fluorescence as background intensity. Relative promoter activity [integrated intensity (selected area mean fluorescence of background)] selected area. To identify the sensitivities of Pecf17 promoter to sequence variations, we used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each mutated region. CV, coefficient of variation; FV, relative (-fold) variation determined by the ration of maximal promoter activity to the minimal promoter activity.Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 and presented as mean standard deviation.

Results

Development of a heterologous ECF transcription system for S. venezuelae

From the 20 well-characterized ECF σ factor/promoter pairs [18], we selected four pairs with high transcriptional activities (ECF11_987 from Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633, ECF11_3276 from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000, ECF16_973 from Pseudomonas putida KT2440, and ECF16_3622 from Pseudomonas entomophila L48). In addition, we chose four σ factors (ECF17_1458, ECF27_4256, ECF34_1384, and ECF38_1322) from S. coelicolor A3(2), which is taxonomically closer to the host strain S. venezuelae ISP5230. The σ factors and their corresponding promoters were cloned into two plasmid backbones, pTHS and pPAP-PT (with an sfGFP encoding gene downstream the promoter), respectively,via one-step Golden gate assembly to generate pTHS-kasOp*-ECFx and pPAP-Pecfx (Table 1, Fig. S1B). Each pTHS-kasOp*-ECFx and its cognate pPAP-Pecfx plasmid pair was introduced into S. venezuelae ISP5230, and the expression levels of sfGFP were quantified using confocal fluorescent microscopy. To exclude potential interfere of the ECF promoters by the host transcription machinery, we introduced the pPAP-Pecfx plasmid to S. venezuelae ISP5230 solely as a negative control. The sfgfp gene cloned downstream of the kasOp* promoter was employed as a positive control (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2

The functionality of the heterologous ECF transcriptional system in S. venezuelae ISP5230. A, Genetic layout of the ECF transcription system. (ECFX: ECF11_3726, ECF11_987, ECF16_3622, ECF16_973, ECF34_1384, ECF27_4265, ECF38_1322 (named as ECF38), ECF17_1458 (named as ECF17); the corresponding Pecfx: Pecf11_3726, Pecf11_987, Pecf16_3622, Pecf16_973, Pecf34_1384, Pecf27_4265, Pecf38_1322 (named as Pecf38), Pecf17_1458 (named as Pecf17). The kasOp* promoter was used as a positive control. The pPAP-Pecfx plasmid in S. venezuelae ISP5230 solely was used as a negative control to exclude potential interference from the host transcription machinery. B, The activities of ECF σ factors in S. venezuelae ISP5230 were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy and processed by ImageJ software. C, Precise quantification of Pecf17 promoter activity using flow cytometry. Data represent the mean SD of at least three replicate experiments, a.u. means arbitrary unit, ** indicates significant difference.

The functionality of the heterologous ECF transcriptional system in S. venezuelae ISP5230. A, Genetic layout of the ECF transcription system. (ECFX: ECF11_3726, ECF11_987, ECF16_3622, ECF16_973, ECF34_1384, ECF27_4265, ECF38_1322 (named as ECF38), ECF17_1458 (named as ECF17); the corresponding Pecfx: Pecf11_3726, Pecf11_987, Pecf16_3622, Pecf16_973, Pecf34_1384, Pecf27_4265, Pecf38_1322 (named as Pecf38), Pecf17_1458 (named as Pecf17). The kasOp* promoter was used as a positive control. The pPAP-Pecfx plasmid in S. venezuelae ISP5230 solely was used as a negative control to exclude potential interference from the host transcription machinery. B, The activities of ECF σ factors in S. venezuelae ISP5230 were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy and processed by ImageJ software. C, Precise quantification of Pecf17 promoter activity using flow cytometry. Data represent the mean SD of at least three replicate experiments, a.u. means arbitrary unit, ** indicates significant difference. As shown in Figs. 2B and S4A, among the eight tested ECF σ factor/promoter pairs, only two of them from S. coelicolor A3(2) were active in S. venezuelae ISP5230. The ECF σ factor/promoter pair ECF17/Pecf17 exhibited a strong activity, and the ECF38/Pecf38 pair showed relatively weak activity. While, in the negative control strain without the plasmid expressing ECF17 σ factor, the cognate promoter Pecf17 was silent, indicating that this promoter could not be activated by the σ factors from S. venezuelae ISP5230 in these conditions (Fig. S4A). Flow cytometry was then used to quantify the activity of ECF17/Pecf17 precisely in S. venezuelae, which showed that the expression level of sfGFP reporter under the control fo ECF17/Pecf17 was approximately 5-fold higher than that of kasOp*, a frequently used strong promoter in Streptomyces (Fig. 2C). To facilitate the subsequent modifications of Pecf17 promoter, we delineated the minimal promoter sequence, which usually contains the up −35 element, −35 box, −10 box, and a possible transcription starting site. It could also eliminate the unnecessary DNA regions that might affect the promoter activity [42] and alleviate the homologous recombination problem caused by using this promoter sequence repetitively [43,44]. By a serial truncation experiment upstream of the proposed −35 region (TGAAC), we found that when the truncation process reached 20 bp upstream of the −35 region, the fluorescence intensity decreased significantly. Thus, the minimal Pecf17 promoter was narrowed to a DNA sequence with a total length of 80 bp (from 25 bp upstream of the −35 region to 28 bp downstream of the −10 region) (Fig. 3A, Fig. S4B).
Fig. 3

Identifying and Engineering the minimal Pecf17 promoter. A, Identification of the minimal Pecf17 promoter by serial truncation. Shown here are the relative activities of promoters truncated upstream of the −35 region compared to the wild-type Pecf17 promoter, which were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy and processed by ImageJ software. B, Effects of random mutagenesis on the activity of Pecf17. Each dot represents a randomly selected mutant containing mutations in the corresponding region. FV means fold variation, CV means coefficient of variation, the results indicated that S1, S2, S7, S8 corresponding to −35 and −10 regions are essential for maintaining promoter activity (FV > 5.9, CV > 0.5); S9 is located between the −10 region and transcriptional start site, it is crucial for promoter activity. Pecf17 activity is insensitive to the mutation of S3, S4, S5, and S6 regions (FV < 3.9, CV < 0.3). C, A Pecf17 promoter library generated by random mutation of the −10 and −35 box sequences and their relative activities in E. coli and S. venezuelae were monitored by Tecan Infinite 200 Pro plate reader with excitation at 485/9 nm and emission at 515/20 nm.

a.u. means arbitrary unit.

Identifying and Engineering the minimal Pecf17 promoter. A, Identification of the minimal Pecf17 promoter by serial truncation. Shown here are the relative activities of promoters truncated upstream of the −35 region compared to the wild-type Pecf17 promoter, which were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy and processed by ImageJ software. B, Effects of random mutagenesis on the activity of Pecf17. Each dot represents a randomly selected mutant containing mutations in the corresponding region. FV means fold variation, CV means coefficient of variation, the results indicated that S1, S2, S7, S8 corresponding to −35 and −10 regions are essential for maintaining promoter activity (FV > 5.9, CV > 0.5); S9 is located between the −10 region and transcriptional start site, it is crucial for promoter activity. Pecf17 activity is insensitive to the mutation of S3, S4, S5, and S6 regions (FV < 3.9, CV < 0.3). C, A Pecf17 promoter library generated by random mutation of the −10 and −35 box sequences and their relative activities in E. coli and S. venezuelae were monitored by Tecan Infinite 200 Pro plate reader with excitation at 485/9 nm and emission at 515/20 nm. a.u. means arbitrary unit. A Pecf17 promoter library was then constructed based on the 80 bp minimal promoter sequence to meet the demand of fine-tune gene expression [45]. We split the sequence from −35 region to −10 region into nine sections and performed saturation mutation for each section to obtain a series of candidates with different strengths. Since the 2 bp sequence upstream of the −10 region is sensitive to mutation, we incorporated them into the −10 region. The critical functional parts of the Pecf17 promoter were determined to be TGAACA (N)14TCCGTAC (Fig. 3B). Ten different promoters from the mutation libraries were chosen for precise quantification in E. coli DH10B and S. venezuelae ISP5230 using flow cytometry.These promoter mutants displayed a wide range of strength and had rank-order consistency in both hosts (Fig. 3C, Table S3), indicating that they have good modularity and portability. In S. venezuelae ISP5230, the lowest promoter activity of the minimal Pecf17 mutant (M10) was approximately 1% that of wild-type Pecf17; while the highest one (M1) was raised to about 2.5 fold of that of wild-type Pecf17, which was 12 fold higher than that of kasOp*.

Production of thaxtomin A in S. venezuelae ISP5230

The ECF17 transcription system was then applied to reconstruct the thaxtomin gene cluster in S. venezuelae ISP5230 (Fig. 4A). The native promoters of txtA and txtE were replaced with Pecf17 bidirectional promoter cassette or the strong constitutive promoter cassette SP43-SP42 as a positive control, and the pathway-specific transcriptional activator gene txtR was excluded from the gene cluster, yielding the pPAS-thax-Pecf17 and pPAS-thax-Pecf17 (Fig. 4A, Fig. S3). Introduction of pPAS-thax-PEA into S. venezuelae ISP5230 obtained S.v/thax-PEA, which gained the capacity to synthesize thaxtomin A (48 ± 9.3 μg/mL) (Fig. 4B), excluding the possibility that the cloned thaxtomin gene cluster was malfunctional. pPAS-thax-Pecf17 was introduced into S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. venezuelae/ECF17 harboring the plasmid for ECF17 σ factor expression to generate S.v/thax-Pecf17 and S.v/ECF17:thax-Pecf17, respectively. As anticipated, S.v/thax-Pecf17 without ECF17 σ factor could not produce thaxtomin A; S.v/ECF17:thax-Pecf17 could synthesize thaxtomin efficiently with the thaxtomin A titer reaching 71.5 ± 5.0 μg/mL, about 50% higher than that in S.v/thax-PEA (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4

Reconstruction and heterologous expression of the thaxtomin gene cluster. A, Genetic organizations of the thaxtomin gene cluster from S. acidsabies ATCC 49003 and the refactored thax-PEA and thax-Pecf17 thaxtomin gene clusters (the Pecf17 promoter activity depends on the presence of ECF17 σ factor). B, Comparison of the thaxtomin A yields in different S. venezuelae heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. ND, not detected. Three different exconjugants from each strain were used in the experiment, and the reported values represent the means ± SD from three biological replicates.

Reconstruction and heterologous expression of the thaxtomin gene cluster. A, Genetic organizations of the thaxtomin gene cluster from S. acidsabies ATCC 49003 and the refactored thax-PEA and thax-Pecf17 thaxtomin gene clusters (the Pecf17 promoter activity depends on the presence of ECF17 σ factor). B, Comparison of the thaxtomin A yields in different S. venezuelae heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. ND, not detected. Three different exconjugants from each strain were used in the experiment, and the reported values represent the means ± SD from three biological replicates.

Improving the production of thaxtomin A using the cumate-inducible ECF17 transcription system

High biosynthesis of heterologous genes in the primary growth impose heavy burdens to the hosets. Besides, constitutive expression of ECF17 factor is probably toxic to the hosts because of its competition with the housekeeping factors for core RNA polymerase along with the growth. So, introduction of an inducible system could alleviate the problems and realize temporal control of gene expression. It has been demonstrated that the engineered CymR* (fusing the oligomerization domain of CI434 to CymR) [38] is able to work cooperatively to generate a sigmoidal response curve in E. coli and is appropriate for use as a rigorous genetic switch. A genetic switch based on CymR* was therefore constructed to control the ECF transcription system in S. venezuelae ISP5230. The CI434 oligomerization domain was fused to the C terminus of CymR to generate CymR*. A hybrid cumate inducible promoter (PCymR*) was obtained by inserting two cumate operators (CuO) into the up- and down-stream of SP43 promoter (Fig. 5A, Fig. S2). The CymR*-PCymR* induction system was then tested in S. venezuelae ISP5230 together with the wild-type CymR system as a control. As shown in Fig. 5B, the CymR* inducible system displayed a much wider dynamic range (>200 fold) than that of the wild-type CymR system (∼85 fold), indicating it could be used as a rigorous genetic switch. Subsequently, the ECF17 factor encoding gene was put under the control of the CymR*-PCymR* induction system to construct a switchable ECF factor transcription system in S. venezuelae ISP5230 (Fig. 5C). Four different RBSs (SR3, SR15, SR33, SR41) with varied strengths [39]were tested for fine-tuning ECF17 gene expression. The time-course experiment revealed that it was appropriate to add the cumate inducer at 4 h (Fig. S5). After the design-build-test cycle, the version named CymR*-Switch 3 (containing RBS SR33) outperformed the other combinations (Fig. S4C). Thus, CymR*-Switch 3 was used to control the expression of ECF17. The expression levels of sfGFP were quantified with flow cytometry, of which the Pecf17 activity had a 60 fold on/off ratio. The Pecf17 promoter activity observed with ECF17 factor controlled by the CymR*-Switch 3 was much higher than that of the constitutively expressed ECF17 factor (Fig. 5D). Meantime, the growth rates of the S.v/ECF17+Pecf17 and S.v/Switch-on + Pecf17 were determined. As shown in Fig. S6A, both strains exhibited lower biomass than wild-type strain. But the S.v/Switch-on + Pecf17 showed higher biomass than S.v/ECF17+Pecf17. These results demonstrate that the cumate-inducible ECF transcription system can indeed decrease the toxicity to the host caused by constitutive expression of ECF17 factor. The switchable ECF17 transcription system was then used for thaxtomin A production by introducing CymR*-Switch 3 into S.v/thax-Pecf17 to generate S.v/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 (Fig. 6A). As anticipated, the thaxtomin A yield was as high as 202.1 15.3 μg/mL (Fig. 6B), representing an almost 4 fold improvement compared to the constitutively expressed ECF17 system. The transcriptional levels of the thax genes were investigated by real-time PCR and the result confirmed that all the genes in the refactored cluster were turned on at high levels by the addition of cumate. It confirmed that the cumate inducible ECF17 system indeed can strongly improve the expression of target gene cluster at transcriptional level (Fig. S7). On the other hand, due to the burden of ECF17, the biomass of S.v/ECF17:thax-Pecf17 was less than the control strain S.v/thax-PEA, while the S.v/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 strain has close biomass to the control strain (Fig. S6B). It emphasized the benefit of alleviation the burden to improving the production of thaxtomin A. Taken together, the data demonstrate that this new cumate-inducible transcription system is effective for activating and improving the expression of target gene clusters in Streptomyces.
Fig. 5

Design and evaluation of the CymR*-PCymR* switch. A, Schematic representation of the cumate-inducible CymR*-PCymR* system. The blue rectangles mean CymR (CymR*) binding site CuO (the same below). Addition of cumate inducer would derepress the PCymR* promoter and lead to the expression of sfGFP reporter. B, The corresponding response curves of de-repression of CymR or CymR* by adding cumate inducer, which were monitored by flow cytometry. C, Fine-tuning the ECF17 expression level with RBSs of different strengths. All the CymR*-Switches were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy. D, Characterization of the CymR*-Switch 3 (containing SR33) with flow cytometry. The constitutively expressed ECF17 was used for comparison. a.u. means arbitrary unit. The data represent the means ± SD from at least three biological replicates.

Fig. 6

Improvement of thaxtomin A production using the inducible ECF17 transcription system. A, Genetic layout of the engineered gene cluster using the ECF17-Switch system. B, Thaxtomin A productions in S. venezuelae heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. C, Thaxtomin A productions in S.albus heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. In addition, we also fermented S.a/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 in B medium. The data represent the means ± SD from three biological replicates.

Design and evaluation of the CymR*-PCymR* switch. A, Schematic representation of the cumate-inducible CymR*-PCymR* system. The blue rectangles mean CymR (CymR*) binding site CuO (the same below). Addition of cumate inducer would derepress the PCymR* promoter and lead to the expression of sfGFP reporter. B, The corresponding response curves of de-repression of CymR or CymR* by adding cumate inducer, which were monitored by flow cytometry. C, Fine-tuning the ECF17 expression level with RBSs of different strengths. All the CymR*-Switches were monitored by confocal fluorescence microscopy. D, Characterization of the CymR*-Switch 3 (containing SR33) with flow cytometry. The constitutively expressed ECF17 was used for comparison. a.u. means arbitrary unit. The data represent the means ± SD from at least three biological replicates. Improvement of thaxtomin A production using the inducible ECF17 transcription system. A, Genetic layout of the engineered gene cluster using the ECF17-Switch system. B, Thaxtomin A productions in S. venezuelae heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. C, Thaxtomin A productions in S.albus heterologous expression strains in OBB medium. In addition, we also fermented S.a/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 in B medium. The data represent the means ± SD from three biological replicates.

Production of thaxtomin A using the inducible ECF17 transcription system in S. albus J1074

To test the applicability of the ECF17 transcription system in other Streptomyces strains, pTHS-ECF17 and its cognate pPAP-Pecf17 plasmid were introduced into another frequently used Streptomyces host S. albus J1074. The confocal fluorescent microscopy results revealed that this system worked well in S. albus J1074 and the Pecf17 promoter activity depended on the presence of the ECF17 factor (Fig. S4D). The ECF17 transcription system was then used to produce thaxtomin A in S. albus J1074. The pPAS-thax-Pecf17 plasmid harboring the engineered thaxtomin gene cluster controlled by Pecf17 was introduced into S. albus J1074, S. albus/ECF17 with pTHS-kasOp*-ECF17, and S. albus/ECF17-Switch with the switchable ECF17 to generate S.a/thax-Pecf17, S.a/ECF17:thax-Pecf17 and S.a/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17, respectively. In addition, plasmid pPAS-thax-PEA that harbors the engineered thaxtomin gene cluster controlled by the constitutive promoter pair SP43-SP42 was introduced into S. albus J1074 to construct a positive control strain S.a/thax-PEA. After 5 days of fermentation in OBB medium, the yield of thaxtomin A in S.a/ECF17:thax-Pecf17 is 136.5  μg/mL, which was approximately 37% higher than that in S.a/thax-PEA (99.3 12.3 μg/mL). For S.a/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17, addition of 50 μM cumate switched on the expression of the ECF17 factor and led to 148.4 μg/mL (Fig. 6C). In our early work, we found that B medium is the optimal fermentation medium for thaxtomin A production in S.albus host (data not shown). So, we also fermentated S.a/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 in B medium, and the thaxtomin A researched 239.3 . It was even higher than that in S.v/ECF17-Switch:thax-Pecf17 (Fig. 6C). Overall, these results demonstrate that the ECF17 transcription system developed for S. venezuelae ISP5230 has a great potential to be applied in the other Streptomyces strains.

Discussion

The fundamental difficulty in manipulating the biosynthesis of target metabolites arises from the inherent complex metabolic regulation of living cells [[46], [47], [48]]. Moverover, the behavior of synthetic elements strongly depends on the cellular context, which significantly limits their engineering applications. Therefore, many engineered gene circuits may work in unexpected ways or even completely lose their function when placed in different genetic backgrounds [[49], [50], [51]]. To overcome these shortcomings, a wide range of orthogonal and well-characterized elements that have minimal undesired cross-talk with the host cells were developed in E.coli [20,51,52]. However, very few of these orthogonal systems were used to Streptomyces, a genus that contains some of the most important sources of natural products applied in human medicine, animal health and plant crop protection. In this study, we constructed an orthogonal ECF17 σ factor based transcription system and tested it in two common heteregous hosts S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. albus J1074. In both strains, the cognate promoter of ECF17 σ factor, Pecf17, was inactive unless ECF17 σ factor was expressed, indicating that Pecf17 could not be recognized by the endogenous σ factors. So such a transcription system will significantly reduce the unwanted influences from the hosts during heterologous expression processes. Furthermore, we designed a novel genetic switch with tight regulation and high activity based on ECF17 transcription activator and cumate-inducible system, which allows fine-tuning of gene expression to desired levels. More importantly, it could be used for driving the expression of large geng cluster. In the case of thaxtomin A, refactoring the thaxtomin gene cluster using the transcription system lead to a dramatic increase in heteregous hosts S. venezuelae ISP5230 and S. albus J1074. In conclusion, our work suggests a new excellent regulatory system for engineering secondary metabolites gene clusters, and contributes a step forward toward the industrialization of thaxtomin A bio-herbicide.We expect that the novel cumate-inducible transcription system established in this study will facilitate the production of important natural drugs in Streptomyces.

Declaration of competing interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

Availability of data and material

Data that supports the finding of this study are available in the main text and the supplementary materials. Ethical approval This article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

All listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xuejin Zhao: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Weijia Wei: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Yeqing Zong: Data curation, Methodology, Software. Chaoxian Bai: Data curation. Xian Guo: Data curation. Hua Zhu: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Chunbo Lou: Supervision, Project administration.
  52 in total

1.  Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks.

Authors:  Călin C Guet; Michael B Elowitz; Weihong Hsing; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Engineering the Ultrasensitive Transcription Factors by Fusing a Modular Oligomerization Domain.

Authors:  Junran Hou; Weiqian Zeng; Yeqing Zong; Zehua Chen; Chensi Miao; Baojun Wang; Chunbo Lou
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 3.  Principles of genetic circuit design.

Authors:  Jennifer A N Brophy; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Thiostrepton-induced gene expression in Streptomyces lividans.

Authors:  T Murakami; T G Holt; C J Thompson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Molecular regulation of antibiotic biosynthesis in streptomyces.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Keith F Chater; Govind Chandra; Guoqing Niu; Huarong Tan
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Novel and tightly regulated resorcinol and cumate-inducible expression systems for Streptomyces and other actinobacteria.

Authors:  Liliya Horbal; Victor Fedorenko; Andriy Luzhetskyy
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Expression of the chaplin and rodlin hydrophobic sheath proteins in Streptomyces venezuelae is controlled by σ(BldN) and a cognate anti-sigma factor, RsbN.

Authors:  Maureen J Bibb; Agota Domonkos; Govind Chandra; Mark J Buttner
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 8.  Themes and variations in gene regulation by extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors.

Authors:  Elena Sineva; Maria Savkina; Sarah E Ades
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression.

Authors:  Howard M Salis; Ethan A Mirsky; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Insulated transcriptional elements enable precise design of genetic circuits.

Authors:  Yeqing Zong; Haoqian M Zhang; Cheng Lyu; Xiangyu Ji; Junran Hou; Xian Guo; Qi Ouyang; Chunbo Lou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.