Literature DB >> 35756709

The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory.

Chantal Chevroulet1, Helen M Paterson1, Angus Yu2, Emily Chew2, Richard I Kemp2.   

Abstract

Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI©) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI© on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI© or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month.
© 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delay; eyewitness memory; eyewitness testimony; guided recall; self-administered interview

Year:  2021        PMID: 35756709      PMCID: PMC9225701          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  8 in total

1.  Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.

Authors:  Amina Memon; Maria Zaragoza; Brian R Clifford; Lynsey Kidd
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2009-03-20

2.  Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview and Drawing Pictures for Eliciting Eyewitness Memories.

Authors:  Kayo Matsuo; Hiroshi Miura
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2016-12-12

3.  Protecting eyewitness evidence: examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool.

Authors:  Fiona Gabbert; Lorraine Hope; Ronald P Fisher
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

4.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.

Authors:  Kenneth A Deffenbacher; Brian H Bornstein; Steven D Penrod; E Kiernan McGorty
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2004-12

6.  How does immediate recall of a stressful event affect psychological response to it?

Authors:  Catherine B Gittins; Helen M Paterson; Louise Sharpe
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-14

7.  Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.

Authors:  Pedro M Paz-Alonso; Gail S Goodman
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-01

8.  Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve.

Authors:  Jaap M J Murre; Joeri Dros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.