Literature DB >> 35755899

Encorafenib and Binimetinib Combination Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma.

Jessica Davis1, Megan Wayman2.   

Abstract

The treatment landscape for metastatic melanoma has changed dramatically over the past few years as new medications have been developed. Encorafenib, a B-Raf protein kinase inhibitor, and binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma which harbor a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation. These approvals were based on findings from the COLUMBUS trial, which demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with the combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib compared with vemurafenib alone. Encorafenib plus binimetinib is the third BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combination to be approved, and there are clinical and practical differences between the combination regimens that should be considered when selecting an appropriate treatment regimen for patients.
© 2022 Harborside™.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35755899      PMCID: PMC9214962          DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.4.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol        ISSN: 2150-0878


Incidence rates of cutaneous melanoma have increased over the past few decades, currently accounting for 1% of all skin cancers. In 2022, an estimated 108,480 new cases will be diagnosed, and 11,990 people are expected to die of melanoma. Metastatic melanoma is associated with high mortality, with 5-year survival rates decreasing from 99% in localized disease to 30% in distant disease (Siegel et al., 2022). Traditional chemotherapy was previously considered the sole option for patients with metastatic melanoma, although this was limited by poor response rates of approximately 10% to 20%. Over the past decade, the treatment landscape has evolved to include immunotherapies and small-molecule targeted regimens, which have demonstrated improved survival rates (Michielin et al., 2020; Schvartsman et al., 2019; Sood et al., 2021). Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma have a protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) point mutation. Mutations at codon 600 of the BRAF gene lead to tumor proliferation through increased signal transduction of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. BRAF V600E is the most common V600 point mutation, occurring in 84.6% of BRAF-mutated melanomas (Cheng et al., 2018). Advances in the detection of BRAF mutations led to the development of targeted agents. Available BRAF inhibitors include dabrafenib (Tafinlar), vemurafenib (Zelboraf), and encorafenib (Braftovi; National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN], 2021). Patients treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy often developed resistant disease as well as secondary malignancies, such as squamous cell carcinoma, through reactivation of the MAPK pathway. The use of combination therapy with an additional inhibitor, targeting the regulator kinases MEK1 and MEK2, may mitigate this resistance pathway. MEK inhibitors include trametinib (Mekinist), cobimetinib (Cotellic), and binimetinib (Mektovi). A MEK inhibitor given in combination with a BRAF inhibitor demonstrated a delay in resistance development and reduction in secondary malignancies (Long et al., 2014; Michielin et al., 2020). Combination regimens targeting BRAF and MEK (e.g., dabrafenib plus trametinib, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, or encorafenib plus binimetinib) are currently recommended as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600-activating mutation. No head-to-head studies comparing combination therapies currently exist; however, it is important to evaluate the differences in adverse event profiles, dosing schedules, administration considerations, storage, and need for additional patient monitoring (NCCN, 2021). This article will focus on the most recently approved BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination regimen, encorafenib plus binimetinib.

PHARMACOLOGY AND MECHANISM OF ACTION

Encorafenib and binimetinib are inhibitors of protein kinases in the MAPK pathway (Figure 1). Encorafenib targets BRAF V600E, V600D, and V600K mutant kinases. Binimetinib is a reversible inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2. The inhibition of BRAF and MEK kinases results in inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation, which ultimately leads to decreased cell proliferation. The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition increases antitumor activity, decreases resistance, and attenuates toxicities compared with the activity of either agent alone (Cheng et al., 2018; Sood et al., 2021). Encorafenib and binimetinib are small-molecule, oral agents. Preclinical data demonstrated a dissociation half-life > 30 hours for encorafenib, compared with 2 hours with dabrafenib and 0.5 hours with vemurafenib; thus, encorafenib is dosed once daily. Steady state was achieved by day 15 (Delord et al., 2017). Binimetinib has a mean terminal half-life of 3.5 hours; therefore, it is approved as twice-daily dosing. Encorafenib is primarily metabolized through CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, and binimetinib is metabolized through glucuronidation (Array Biopharma Inc., 2018a, 2018b).
Figure 1

MAPK pathway and targets of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Adapted from Sood et al. (2021).

MAPK pathway and targets of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Adapted from Sood et al. (2021).

CLINICAL TRIALS

Encorafenib plus binimetinib was approved in 2018 for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. This approval was based on a two-part, randomized, phase III, open-label study. Patients were treatment naive or had progressed on or after previous first-line immunotherapy. Part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial compared encorafenib 450 mg daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily vs. encorafenib 300 mg daily vs. vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the combination arm was 14.9 months compared with 7.3 months in the vemurafenib monotherapy arm (p < .001). Median overall survival (OS) was also longer in the combination arm compared with the vemurafenib arm (33.6 months vs. 16.9 months; p < .001). The five-year PFS and OS rates for the combination arm were 22.9% and 34.7%, respectively, compared with 10.2% and 21.4% in the vemurafenib monotherapy arm (Dummer et al., 2018a, 2018b, 2021). Part 2 of the COLUMBUS trial was conducted to elucidate the true effect of binimetinib in combination with encorafenib. This study confirmed the benefit of combination therapy by demonstrating a significant improvement in PFS with encorafenib plus binimetinib vs. encorafenib monotherapy (Dummer et al., 2018c).

ADVERSE EVENTS

The most frequently reported adverse events in the encorafenib plus binimetanib combination arm of the COLUMBUS trial were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting (Table 1). Skin toxicities, increased aminotransferase concentrations, serous retinopathy, left ventricular dysfunction, and pyrexia are commonly associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy. In the phase III trial, skin toxicities were less common in the combination arm compared with the two monotherapy arms. Increased aminotransferase concentrations, serous retinopathy (20% vs. 2% vs. 2% in the combination, encorafenib, and vemurafenib arms, respectively), and left ventricular dysfunction (8% vs. 2% vs. 1% in the combination, encorafenib, and vemurafenib arms, respectively) were more common in the combination arm. Adverse events leading to dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy occurred in 53% of patients in the combination group, 71% of patients in the encorafenib monotherapy group, and 62% of patients in the vemurafenib monotherapy group. The most common adverse event leading to dose reduction or therapy interruption in the combination arm was nausea. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the combination arm were increased γ-glutamyltransferase (11%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 6%), hypertension (6%), and increased creatinine phosphokinase (5%). Safety and tolerability of part 2 was consistent with part 1 results (Dummer et al., 2018a, b, c).
Table 1

Efficacy and Safety of BRAF Plus MEK Inhibitor Combination Regimens

Vemurafenib plus cobimetinibDabrafenib plus trametinibEncorafenib plus binimetinib
TrialcoBRIMCOMBI-d, COMBI-v (pooled analysis)COLUMBUS
Median PFS, mo12.611.114.9
PFS, %
 3 yr232329
 5 yr1419N/A
Median OS, mo22.525.933.6
OS, %
 3 yr384447
 5 yr3134N/A
Select AEs, any grade, %
 Fatigue383543
 Nausea443744
 Diarrhea613638
 Vomiting283132
 Pyrexia325820
 Photosensitivity reaction35NR4
 Rash422816
 Arthralgia392928
 Increased ALT274811
 Increased AST27599

Note. Information from Ascierto et al. (2021); Dummer et al. (2018b); Robert et al. (2019); Schadendorf et al. (2017).

Note. Information from Ascierto et al. (2021); Dummer et al. (2018b); Robert et al. (2019); Schadendorf et al. (2017).

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADVANCED PRACTITIONER

Encorafenib plus binimetinib is FDA approved for patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF-activating mutations. Encorafenib is dosed at 450 mg orally once daily and may be taken with or without food. It is available as 75 mg capsules, so patients must take 6 capsules daily. Notably, the initial dose of encorafenib should be reduced to 300 mg once daily when used as monotherapy or if binimetinib is held for toxicity. The recommended dose for binimetinib is 45 mg orally twice daily, which is 3 of the 15-mg tablets twice daily. Binimetinib may also be taken with or without food. The dose of encorafenib should be reduced with concomitant use of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors due to increase in encorafenib plasma concentrations and risk of increased adverse reactions. Use of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided due to the risk of decreased encorafenib plasma concentrations and thus decreased efficacy. No significant drug interactions have been observed with binimetinib; however, a dose reduction is recommended in moderate or severe hepatic impairment. No dose reductions are required in mild or moderate renal impairment for either agent, and the optimal dose has not been established in severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min). Adverse events necessitating a dose reduction of encorafenib include uveitis, QTc prolongation, hepatotoxicity, severe dermatologic reactions, and other grade 2 to 4 reactions. The recommended dose is 300 mg for the first dose reduction and 225 mg for the second dose reduction. If the patient is unable to tolerate the 225 mg dose, then encorafenib should be permanently discontinued. Adverse events necessitating a dose reduction of binimetinib include cardiomyopathies, venous thromboembolism, life-threatening pulmonary embolism, renal vein occlusion, uveitis, interstitial lung disease, rhabdomyolysis, severe dermatologic reactions, and other grade 2 to 4 adverse events. The recommended dose reduction is 30 mg twice daily. Binimetinib should be permanently discontinued if 30 mg twice daily is not tolerated (Array Biopharma Inc., 2018a, 2018b). The three currently FDA-approved BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combinations have not been studied head-to-head, and all three regimens are Category 1 recommendations for the first-line treatment of BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. However, there are clinical and practical considerations for each treatment regimen that can help guide treatment selection (Table 2). Vemurafenib plus cobimetinib has a higher incidence of skin toxicities, particularly photosensitivity, compared with the other combinations, and cobimetinib is taken on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle as opposed to a continuous schedule, which requires patients be able to manage this dosing schedule (Genentech Inc., 2018, 2020). Dabrafenib plus trametinib should be taken on an empty stomach 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal, and trametinib should be stored in the refrigerator, both of which can be inconvenient and difficult to remember for patients. Dabrafenib plus trametinib has a higher incidence of pyrexia compared with the other combination regimens (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2021a, 2021b). Encorafenib plus binimetinib can be taken with or without food but have a higher pill burden than the other combinations. All three combination regimens require cardiac monitoring with routine echocardiograms per the package inserts; encorafenib plus binimetinib and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib also require routine electrocardiograms (Array Biopharma Inc., 2018a, 2018b; Genentech Inc., 2018, 2020). Patient characteristics and preferences should be considered when determining the most appropriate treatment regimen.
Table 2

Comparison of BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Combinations

BRAF inhibitor Vemurafenib Dabrafenib Encorafenib
Dose960 mg (240 mg tab × 4)150 mg (75 mg cap × 2)450 mg (75 mg cap × 6)
Frequencyq12hq12hDaily
AdministrationWith or without foodOn an empty stomachWith or without food
Other considerationsHigher incidence photosensitivity QTc monitoringHigher incidence pyrexiaHigh pill burden QTc monitoring
MEK inhibitor Cobimetinib Trametinib Binimetinib
Dose60 mg (20 mg tab × 3)2 mg (2 mg tab × 1)45 mg tab (15 mg tab × 3)
FrequencyDaily on days 1–21 of 28-day cycleDailyq12h
AdministrationWith or without foodOn an empty stomachWith or without food
Other considerationsDosing schedule (week off) Echocardiogram monitoringRequires refrigeration Echocardiogram monitoringEchocardiogram monitoring
Total pill burden (daily)11512

Note. Information from Array Biopharma Inc. (2018a, 2018b); Genentech Inc. (2018, 2020); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (2021a, 2021b).

Note. Information from Array Biopharma Inc. (2018a, 2018b); Genentech Inc. (2018, 2020); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (2021a, 2021b).

SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

The treatment landscape for melanoma has evolved extensively over the past decade. The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has led to improved outcomes in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib has been shown to improve PFS and OS and is relatively well-tolerated in patients. No head-to-head studies comparing BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combination regimens exist, and there is no current preferred combination regimen. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors in patients who previously received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in the setting of disease progression with an alternative BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combination regimen, and in regards to sequencing with immunotherapy (NCCN, 2021).
  12 in total

1.  Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Reinhard Dummer; Paolo A Ascierto; Helen J Gogas; Ana Arance; Mario Mandala; Gabriella Liszkay; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf; Ivana Krajsova; Ralf Gutzmer; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Caroline Dutriaux; Jan Willem B de Groot; Naoya Yamazaki; Carmen Loquai; Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Michael D Pickard; Victor Sandor; Caroline Robert; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma.

Authors:  Georgina V Long; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Helen Gogas; Evgeny Levchenko; Filippo de Braud; James Larkin; Claus Garbe; Thomas Jouary; Axel Hauschild; Jean Jacques Grob; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Celeste Lebbe; Mario Mandalà; Michael Millward; Ana Arance; Igor Bondarenko; John B A G Haanen; Johan Hansson; Jochen Utikal; Virginia Ferraresi; Nadezhda Kovalenko; Peter Mohr; Volodymyr Probachai; Dirk Schadendorf; Paul Nathan; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas; Douglas J DeMarini; Jhangir G Irani; Michelle Casey; Daniele Ouellet; Anne-Marie Martin; Ngocdiep Le; Kiran Patel; Keith Flaherty
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials.

Authors:  Dirk Schadendorf; Georgina V Long; Daniil Stroiakovski; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Axel Hauschild; Evgeny Levchenko; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Jacob Schachter; Claus Garbe; Caroline Dutriaux; Helen Gogas; Mario Mandalà; John B A G Haanen; Céleste Lebbé; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski; Jean-Jacques Grob; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Michael A Davies; Ying Zhang; Mathilde Kaper; Bijoyesh Mookerjee; Jeffrey J Legos; Keith T Flaherty; Caroline Robert
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Reinhard Dummer; Paolo A Ascierto; Helen J Gogas; Ana Arance; Mario Mandala; Gabriella Liszkay; Claus Garbe; Dirk Schadendorf; Ivana Krajsova; Ralf Gutzmer; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Caroline Dutriaux; Jan Willem B de Groot; Naoya Yamazaki; Carmen Loquai; Laure A Moutouh-de Parseval; Michael D Pickard; Victor Sandor; Caroline Robert; Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Five-Year Outcomes with Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Jean J Grob; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Axel Hauschild; Evgeny Levchenko; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Jacob Schachter; Claus Garbe; Igor Bondarenko; Helen Gogas; Mario Mandalá; John B A G Haanen; Celeste Lebbé; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski; Paul D Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Michael A Davies; Keith T Flaherty; Paul Burgess; Monique Tan; Eduard Gasal; Maurizio Voi; Dirk Schadendorf; Georgina V Long
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cancer statistics, 2022.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Molecular testing for BRAF mutations to inform melanoma treatment decisions: a move toward precision medicine.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Francesco Massari; Gregory T MacLennan; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  Management of metastatic cutaneous melanoma: updates in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gustavo Schvartsman; Patricia Taranto; Isabella C Glitza; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Michael B Atkins; Antonio C Buzaid
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  5-Year Outcomes with Cobimetinib plus Vemurafenib in BRAFV600 Mutation-Positive Advanced Melanoma: Extended Follow-up of the coBRIM Study.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Brigitte Dréno; James Larkin; Antoni Ribas; Gabriella Liszkay; Michele Maio; Mario Mandalà; Lev Demidov; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Luc Thomas; Luis de la Cruz-Merino; Victoria Atkinson; Caroline Dutriaux; Claus Garbe; Jessie Hsu; Surai Jones; Haocheng Li; Edward McKenna; Athina Voulgari; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Current Advancements and Novel Strategies in the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Siddhartha Sood; Rahul Jayachandiran; Siyaram Pandey
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.