| Literature DB >> 35755899 |
Jessica Davis1, Megan Wayman2.
Abstract
The treatment landscape for metastatic melanoma has changed dramatically over the past few years as new medications have been developed. Encorafenib, a B-Raf protein kinase inhibitor, and binimetinib, a MEK inhibitor, were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma which harbor a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation. These approvals were based on findings from the COLUMBUS trial, which demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with the combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib compared with vemurafenib alone. Encorafenib plus binimetinib is the third BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combination to be approved, and there are clinical and practical differences between the combination regimens that should be considered when selecting an appropriate treatment regimen for patients.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755899 PMCID: PMC9214962 DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.4.7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Pract Oncol ISSN: 2150-0878
Figure 1MAPK pathway and targets of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Adapted from Sood et al. (2021).
Efficacy and Safety of BRAF Plus MEK Inhibitor Combination Regimens
| Vemurafenib plus cobimetinib | Dabrafenib plus trametinib | Encorafenib plus binimetinib | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | coBRIM | COMBI-d, COMBI-v (pooled analysis) | COLUMBUS |
| Median PFS, mo | 12.6 | 11.1 | 14.9 |
| PFS, % | |||
| 3 yr | 23 | 23 | 29 |
| 5 yr | 14 | 19 | N/A |
| Median OS, mo | 22.5 | 25.9 | 33.6 |
| OS, % | |||
| 3 yr | 38 | 44 | 47 |
| 5 yr | 31 | 34 | N/A |
| Select AEs, any grade, % | |||
| Fatigue | 38 | 35 | 43 |
| Nausea | 44 | 37 | 44 |
| Diarrhea | 61 | 36 | 38 |
| Vomiting | 28 | 31 | 32 |
| Pyrexia | 32 | 58 | 20 |
| Photosensitivity reaction | 35 | NR | 4 |
| Rash | 42 | 28 | 16 |
| Arthralgia | 39 | 29 | 28 |
| Increased ALT | 27 | 48 | 11 |
| Increased AST | 27 | 59 | 9 |
Note. Information from Ascierto et al. (2021); Dummer et al. (2018b); Robert et al. (2019); Schadendorf et al. (2017).
Comparison of BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Combinations
|
|
|
|
|
| Dose | 960 mg (240 mg tab × 4) | 150 mg (75 mg cap × 2) | 450 mg (75 mg cap × 6) |
| Frequency | q12h | q12h | Daily |
| Administration | With or without food | On an empty stomach | With or without food |
| Other considerations | Higher incidence photosensitivity QTc monitoring | Higher incidence pyrexia | High pill burden QTc monitoring |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dose | 60 mg (20 mg tab × 3) | 2 mg (2 mg tab × 1) | 45 mg tab (15 mg tab × 3) |
| Frequency | Daily on days 1–21 of 28-day cycle | Daily | q12h |
| Administration | With or without food | On an empty stomach | With or without food |
| Other considerations | Dosing schedule (week off) Echocardiogram monitoring | Requires refrigeration Echocardiogram monitoring | Echocardiogram monitoring |
| Total pill burden (daily) | 11 | 5 | 12 |
Note. Information from Array Biopharma Inc. (2018a, 2018b); Genentech Inc. (2018, 2020); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (2021a, 2021b).